Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gregory Eisenman”
Williams v. Commissionerpublic domain
The petitioner Gregory Williams’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 837 (AC 23178), is denied.
Williams v. Commissioner of Correctionpublic domain
Opinion PER CURIAM. The petitioner, Gregory Williams, appeals from the habeas court’s judgment denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly dismissed his petition after concluding that he did not establish that he was prejudiced by his trial counsel’s decision not to request a jury instruction on the defense of intoxication. We
Jennifer Keeton v. Mary Jane Anderson-Wileypublic domain
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-13925 DECEMBER 16, 2011 _____
State v. Erhardtpublic domain
Spallone, J. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3), and attempt to commit larceny *360in the first degree by extortion, General Statutes §§ 53a-122 (a) (1) and 53a-49. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in denying his request to c
In re L.M.public domain
2019 UT App 174 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF L.M., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. A.M., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Per Curiam Opinion No. 20190657-CA Filed October 31, 2019
Gerdes v. G & H Towing Co.public domain
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENT, District Judge. This case arises out of a collision between a tugboat and a tanker in the Houston Ship Channel, which killed several crewmembers of the tugboat, injured others, and damaged the tugboat and the tanker. Now before the Court is Defendant Hough Marine and Machine, Inc.’s Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Claims for N
Synakorn v. Commissioner of Correctionpublic domain
6 A.3d 819 (2010) 124 Conn.App. 768 Boone SYNAKORN v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. No. 30941. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 8, 2010. Decided November 2, 2010. *822 Deren Manasevit, special public defender, for the appellant (petitioner). Linda Currie-Zeffiro, assis
O'Gara Coach Co. v. Rapublic domain
PERLUSS, P. J. *242*1119Darren Richie, the former president and chief operating officer of O'Gara Coach Company, LLC, is a principal of Richie Litigation, P.C. O'Gara Coach moved to disqualify Richie Litigation from representing its former senior execut
Carew v. Statepublic domain
817 N.E.2d 281 (2004) Darald W. CAREW, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A02-0403-PC-231. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 9, 2004. *282 Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana, Brian Eisenman, Deputy Public *283 Defender, Indianapolis, IN, Attorne
In re I.C.public domain
2025 UT App 20 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF I.C., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. A.M.C. AND M.C., Appellants, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion Nos. 20231136-CA and 20231141-CA Filed February 21,
In re I.C.public domain
2025 UT App 20 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF I.C., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. A.M.C. AND M.C., Appellants, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion Nos. 20231136-CA and 20231141-CA Filed February 21,
State v. Duncanpublic domain
González, J. ¶1 This case presents two questions: (1) whether Chad Duncan can challenge the legal financial obligations (LFOs) imposed by the trial court for the first time on appeal and (2) whether the police properly searched his car for a gun after a drive-by shooting. We answer yes to both questions, affirm Duncan’s conviction, and remand for *434resentencing with pro
O'Gara Coach Co., LLC v. Rapublic domain
Filed1/7/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN O’GARA COACH COMPANY, B286730 LLC, (Los Angeles County Cross-complainant and Super. Ct. No. SC125609) Appellant, v. JOSEPH RA, Cross-defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Ange
Bernie v. Catholic Diocese of Sioux Fallspublic domain
ZINTER, Justice. [¶ 1.] A number of former students who attended a boarding school alleged that they had been sexually abused while attending the school. They sued some of the alleged perpetrators and four entity defendants, including the Catholic Diocese of Sioux Falls. 1 The circuit court granted summary judgment in f
Jensen Ex Rel. Jensen v. Cunninghampublic domain
250 P.3d 465 (2011) 2011 UT 17 Parker JENSEN, a minor, by and through his parents and natural guardians, Barbara and Daren JENSEN; Barbara Jensen, individually, and Daren Jensen, individually, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Kari CUNNINGHAM; Richard Anderson; Lars M. Wagner; Karen H. Albritton; Susan Eisenman; and Jane and John Doe, Defendants and Appellees. No. 20090277. Supreme
Justin Sanchez v. Ladotpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUSTIN SANCHEZ, No. 21-55285 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-05044- DMG-AFM LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ORDER AND
Justin Sanchez v. Ladotpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUSTIN SANCHEZ, No. 21-55285 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-05044- DMG-AFM LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; CITY OF LOS ANGELES, OPINION
Fredrickson v. Starbucks Corp.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER MARSH, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Hubei filed his Findings and Recommendation on August 28, 2013. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Ma
Jihad Adbul-Mumit v. Alexandria Hyundai, LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
Balboa Insurance v. Floydpublic domain
BARKDULL, Chief Judge. The appellant issued a homeowners insurance policy to the appellee, Joseph Sawyer. The policy contained the following provisions covering accidental injury to another : * * * * * * “1. Coverage E — Personal Liability “(a) Liability: To pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall be