⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gregory Eisenman”

Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003-12-16 · Published · cited 0× · 267 Conn. 905; 838 A.2d 213; 2003 Conn. LEXIS 522
The petitioner Gregory Williams’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 837 (AC 23178), is denied.
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003-10-14 · Published · cited 1× · 79 Conn. App. 837; 832 A.2d 88; 2003 Conn. App. LEXIS 438
Opinion PER CURIAM. The petitioner, Gregory Williams, appeals from the habeas court’s judgment denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly dismissed his petition after concluding that he did not establish that he was prejudiced by his trial counsel’s decision not to request a jury instruction on the defense of intoxication. We
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011-12-16 · Published · cited 53× · 664 F.3d 865; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 25077; 2011 WL 6275932
[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 10-13925 DECEMBER 16, 2011 _____
State v. Erhardtpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989-01-24 · Published · cited 16× · 17 Conn. App. 359; 553 A.2d 188; 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 21
Spallone, J. The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3), and attempt to commit larceny *360in the first degree by extortion, General Statutes §§ 53a-122 (a) (1) and 53a-49. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in denying his request to c
In re L.M.public domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2019-10-31 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 UT App 174
2019 UT App 174 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF L.M., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. A.M., Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Per Curiam Opinion No. 20190657-CA Filed October 31, 2019
District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 967 F. Supp. 943; 1997 A.M.C. 2990; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9402; 1997 WL 369432
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT KENT, District Judge. This case arises out of a collision between a tugboat and a tanker in the Houston Ship Channel, which killed several crewmembers of the tugboat, injured others, and damaged the tugboat and the tanker. Now before the Court is Defendant Hough Marine and Machine, Inc.’s Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Claims for N
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010-11-02 · Published · cited 9× · 6 A.3d 819; 124 Conn. App. 768
6 A.3d 819 (2010) 124 Conn.App. 768 Boone SYNAKORN v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION. No. 30941. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued September 8, 2010. Decided November 2, 2010. *822 Deren Manasevit, special public defender, for the appellant (petitioner). Linda Currie-Zeffiro, assis
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2019-01-07 · Published · cited 31× · 242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 239; 30 Cal. App. 5th 1115
PERLUSS, P. J. *242*1119Darren Richie, the former president and chief operating officer of O'Gara Coach Company, LLC, is a principal of Richie Litigation, P.C. O'Gara Coach moved to disqualify Richie Litigation from representing its former senior execut
Carew v. Statepublic domain
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004-11-09 · Published · cited 8× · 817 N.E.2d 281; 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 2199; 2004 WL 2521671
817 N.E.2d 281 (2004) Darald W. CAREW, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee-Plaintiff. No. 49A02-0403-PC-231. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 9, 2004. *282 Susan K. Carpenter, Public Defender of Indiana, Brian Eisenman, Deputy Public *283 Defender, Indianapolis, IN, Attorne
In re I.C.public domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2025-02-21 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 UT App 20
2025 UT App 20 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF I.C., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. A.M.C. AND M.C., Appellants, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion Nos. 20231136-CA and 20231141-CA Filed February 21,
In re I.C.public domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2025-02-21 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 UT App 20
2025 UT App 20 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, IN THE INTEREST OF I.C., A PERSON UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE. A.M.C. AND M.C., Appellants, v. STATE OF UTAH, Appellee. Opinion Nos. 20231136-CA and 20231141-CA Filed February 21,
State v. Duncanpublic domain
Washington Supreme Court · 2016-04-28 · Published · cited 40× · 185 Wash. 2d 430; 374 P.3d 83
González, J. ¶1 This case presents two questions: (1) whether Chad Duncan can challenge the legal financial obligations (LFOs) imposed by the trial court for the first time on appeal and (2) whether the police properly searched his car for a gun after a drive-by shooting. We answer yes to both questions, affirm Duncan’s conviction, and remand for *434resentencing with pro
California Court of Appeal · 2019-01-07 · Published · cited 0×
Filed1/7/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN O’GARA COACH COMPANY, B286730 LLC, (Los Angeles County Cross-complainant and Super. Ct. No. SC125609) Appellant, v. JOSEPH RA, Cross-defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Ange
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2012-09-05 · Published · cited 24× · 2012 S.D. 63; 821 N.W.2d 232; 2012 WL 3966361
ZINTER, Justice. [¶ 1.] A number of former students who attended a boarding school alleged that they had been sexually abused while attending the school. They sued some of the alleged perpetrators and four entity defendants, including the Catholic Diocese of Sioux Falls. 1 The circuit court granted summary judgment in f
Utah Supreme Court · 2011-03-29 · Published · cited 48× · 2011 UT 17; 250 P.3d 465; 679 Utah Adv. Rep. 18; 2011 Utah LEXIS 32; 2011 WL 1129730
250 P.3d 465 (2011) 2011 UT 17 Parker JENSEN, a minor, by and through his parents and natural guardians, Barbara and Daren JENSEN; Barbara Jensen, individually, and Daren Jensen, individually, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Kari CUNNINGHAM; Richard Anderson; Lars M. Wagner; Karen H. Albritton; Susan Eisenman; and Jane and John Doe, Defendants and Appellees. No. 20090277. Supreme
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUSTIN SANCHEZ, No. 21-55285 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-05044- DMG-AFM LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ORDER AND
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-05-23 · Published · cited 20× · 39 F.4th 548
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JUSTIN SANCHEZ, No. 21-55285 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-05044- DMG-AFM LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; CITY OF LOS ANGELES, OPINION
District Court, D. Oregon · 2013-10-29 · Published · cited 0× · 980 F. Supp. 2d 1227; 2013 WL 5819104; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154863
OPINION AND ORDER MARSH, District Judge. Magistrate Judge Hubei filed his Findings and Recommendation on August 28, 2013. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b). When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Ma
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-07-13 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972-05-16 · Published · cited 0× · 262 So. 2d 202; 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6700
BARKDULL, Chief Judge. The appellant issued a homeowners insurance policy to the appellee, Joseph Sawyer. The policy contained the following provisions covering accidental injury to another : * * * * * * “1. Coverage E — Personal Liability “(a) Liability: To pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall be