Cases

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Gregory P. Dean, a St. Tammany Parish Deputy Sheriff, appeals from a jury conviction of violating 18 U.S.C. § 242 1 by using *93 excessive force under col

The issue presented by this petition for the writ of mandamus is whether the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct may be admitted into evidence in a legal malpractice action to show a breach of the standard of care. The plaintiffs in an action pending in the Baldwin Circuit Court seek a writ directing the trial judge to allow the plaintiffs to introduce the Rules of Professional Conduct and to allow an expert witness to rely on those Rules in stating an opinion as to the applicable s

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Heidi Dragomir appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and dismissing without prejudice for lack of standing claims Dragomir asserted on behalf of her minor child and dismissing claims Dragomir asserted on her own

34 F.3d 44 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Dean THOMAS, also known as "Dino," Defendant,Jaime A. Davidson, also known as "Stringer," also known as"Andrew Brown," also known as "Jaime Davidson," Juan A.Morales, also known as "Pedro," also known as "Antonio,"Robert Lawrence, also known as "Robert Julian," also knownas "Bam-Bam," Lenworth Parke, also known as "LenwoodParker," also known as "Glen," also known as "Pa

May 20 2014 DA 13-0052 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2014 MT 132 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JULIAN JAMES HENDRICKSON, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Fourth Judicial District,

STRAS, Circuit Judge. An investor loaned $20 million to EngagePoint, Inc., which was the prime contractor on a major software project for the State of Missouri. When Missouri terminated the contract and EngagePoint was unable to repay its debts, the investor sued and claimed that Missouri had fraudulently induced the loan and illegally discriminated against EngagePoint. The district cou

69 Ill. App.3d 477 (1979) 387 N.E.2d 810 EDWARD MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 78-530. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (2nd Division). Opinion filed February 27, 1979. *478 Dean Timothy Jost and Julian N. Henriques, Jr., both of Chic

Cuéllar, J. The Legislature directed the Insurance Commissioner to "promulgate reasonable rules and regulations ... as are necessary to administer" the Unfair Insurance Practices Act. (Ins. Code, § 790.10.) The question before us is whether that statutory authority supports the Insurance Commissioner's 2011 regulation covering replacement cost estimates for homeowners insurance (Cal.

JUDGMENT Court of Appeals First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00027-CV JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Louie Albarado, Walter Albro, Haskell Andrews, Johnny Anazaldua, Jose Manuel Araujo, James D. Archer, Roberto Ovalle Armendariz, Matthew Auguste, David Bachus, Richard

661 F.Supp.2d 871 (2009) JOHN B., Carrie G., Joshua M., Megan A. and Erica A., by their next friend, L.A.; Dustin P., by his next friend, Linda C.; Bayli S. by her next friend, C.W.; James D. by his next friend, Susan H; Elsie H. by her next friend, Stacy Miller; Julian C. by his next friend, Shawn C; Troy D. by his next friend, T.W.; Ray M. by his next friend, P.D.; Roscoe W. by his next friend, K.B.; Jacob R. by his next friend, Kim B.; Justin S. by hi

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 20-2500 ___________________________ Philip Petrone; Stewart Fisher; Jasbir Singh; Brian Pankz, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Jason Dewayne Gunn; Ahmad Abdinasir; Adam F. Akhalu; Latoshia Denise Anderson; Derek C. Anglero; Alan Blane Arthur; Christopher A

21 P.3d 245 (2001) 2001 UT App 55 Julian Dean HATCH and Lynne Mitchell, Appellants, v. BOULDER TOWN COUNCIL; Town of Boulder Planning Commission and/or Board of Adjustment; Boulder Excavating Company; Sam Stout; and Rhea Thompson, Appellees. No. 20000189-CA. Court of Appeals of Utah. February 23, 2001. Rehearing Denied April 4, 2001.

ORDER: 1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; 2) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND 3) DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS’MOTION TO STRIKE DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. On July 24, 2013, the Court heard Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Remaining Claim of-Plai

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-1884 ___________________________ Philip Petrone; Stewart Fisher; Jasbir Singh; Brian Pankz, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Jason Dewayne Gunn; Ahmad Abdinasir; Adam F. Akhalu; Latoshia Denise Anderson; Derek C. Anglero; Alan Blane Arthur; Christopher A

Supreme Court of Florida No. SC21-284 IN RE: AMENDMENT TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 6-10.3. December 16, 2021 PER CURIAM. Earlier this year, the Court amended the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar to preclude continuing legal education credit for “any course submitted by a sponsor, including a section of The Florida Bar, that uses quotas based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation in the selection of course faculty or participants.” In re

Supreme Court of Florida No. SC21-284 IN RE: AMENDMENT TO RULE REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR 6-10.3. December 16, 2021 PER CURIAM. Earlier this year, the Court amended the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar to preclude continuing legal education credit for “any course submitted by a sponsor, including a section of The Florida Bar, that uses quotas based on race, ethnicity, gender, religion, national origin, disability, or sexual orientation in the selection of course faculty or participants.” In re

Opinion issued November 5, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00027-CV ——————————— JUAN ALANIZ, ET AL., Appellants 1 1 The appellants are: Bernardino Acevedo, Juan A. Alaniz, Rafael Alaniz, Lo

Opinion CHIN, J. This case presents questions regarding how the Board of Equalization (Board) may assess the value of an electric powerplant for purposes of property taxation. The issue is complicated by the circumstance that, with exceptions not relevant here, assessors may not include the value of intangible assets and rights in the value of taxable proper

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH AUG 23 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PAT

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 18-1574 ___________________________ Philip Petrone, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Stewart Fisher, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Jasbir Singh, on behalf of themselves and all those similarly situated; Brian Pankz, on behalf of