Cases

CONCURRING OPINION No. 04-07-00091-CV Gregory KINNEY and Marsha Kinney, Appellants v. Floyd Ross PALMER, Individually and d/b/a Renaissance Homes, Appellee From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

i i i i i i MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-07-00091-CV Gregory Kinney and Marsha KINNEY, Appellants v. Floyd Ross PALMER, Individually and d/b/a Renaissance Homes,

RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge, joined by EDITH H. JONES, JERRY E. SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, concurring in part and dissenting in part: The privilege of absurdity; to which no living creature is subject but man only. *375 Thomas Hobbes, Le

170 F.Supp.2d 173 (2001) George KINNEY, Alles Corporation, Thomas Gallagher, Ben Hasten, and Mark Jaffe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. METRO GLOBAL MEDIA, INC., Dan H. Eberly, Kenneth F. Guarino, A. Daniel Geribo, T. James Blair, Janet M. Hoey, and Trien Rosenberg Rosenberg Weinberg Ciullo & Fazzari, LLP. No. 99-579 ML. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.<

MEMORANDUM ** Charles G. Kinney appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his action seeking a declaratory judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003) (dismissal based on the Rooker-Feldman doctrine); Vasquez v. Los Angeles County, 487 F.3d 1246, 1249 (9th Cir. 2007) (dismissal for failu

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge RUSSELL and Judge MICHAEL joined. OPINION DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: The district court concluded that an employer did not violate the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (1994), when it discharged a shoe salesman who suffered fr

KANNE, Circuit Judge. This is a civil rights action brought by Gregory Neal Kinney, an eighteen-year old inmate who was shot while trying to escape from an Indiana correctional facility where he was confined for a six-year term on charges of escape and car theft. Kinney claimed excessive force was used in thwarting his escape and sued the officer who shot him as well as seven supervisory officials. The district court conclud

950 F.2d 462 Gregory N. KINNEY, Petitioner-Appellant,v.INDIANA YOUTH CENTER, By and Through its duly appointedAgents, Employees and Representatives, Sally A. Park, ThomasD. Richards, Paul W. O'Hauer, Indiana Department ofCorrection, and its Agents, Employees, Board Members andformer Commissioner, John T. Shettle, Wesley A. Kissel,Barbara J. Cope, Daniel F. Evans, Jr., Dr. Robert A. Keller,John M. Nally, Robert W. Pri

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Today we review a denial of a law officer's motion for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity on a claim of excessive force in a tasing. We reverse the denial of summary judgment to the law officer and render judgment to him. I. On January 29, 2014, Deputy Frederick McGr

635 N.W.2d 449 (2001) 262 Neb. 812 STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Douglas A. KINNEY, Appellant. No. S-00-750. Supreme Court of Nebraska. November 9, 2001. *450 Gregory C. Scaglione, Omaha, of Koley Jessen, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Don Stenberg, Attorney General, and Marilyn B. Hutchinson, Linco

AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court are Defendants John Roach, Sr. and Christopher *658Milner's ("CCDAO Defendants") Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #17), Defendant Collin County, Texas' ("the County") Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (Dkt. #18), and Defendants

KING, Chief Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellees Dean Kinney and David Hall brought suit against seven law enforcement officials, the seven cities or counties that employ these officials, and the East Texas Police Chiefs’ Association,1 asserting four claims: (1) a 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2) claim alleging conspiracy against Kinney and Hall because of their testimony in judicial proceedings, (2) a 42 U.S.C. § 198

301 F.3d 253 Dean KINNEY; David Hall, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Bobby WEAVER, Etc.; et al., Defendants,J.B. Smith, Smith County Sheriff; Smith County, Texas; W.A. "Bill" Young, Tyler Police Chief; City of Tyler, Texas; East Texas Police Chief's Association; Bobby Weaver, Gregg County Sheriff; Bob Green, Harrison County Sheriff; Gregg County, Texas; Harrison County, Texas; Ronnie Moore, Kilgore Director of Public Safety; Charles "Chuck" Wil

367 F.3d 337 Dean KINNEY; David Hall, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.Bobby WEAVER, Etc.; et al., Defendants,J.B. Smith, Smith County Sheriff; Smith County, Texas; W.A. "Bill" Young, Tyler Police Chief; City of Tyler, Texas; East Texas Police Chief's Association; Bobby Weaver, Gregg County Sheriff; Bob Green, Harrison County Sheriff; Gregg County, Texas; Harrison County, Texas; Ronnie Moore, Kilgore Director of Public Safety; Charles "Chuck" Wil

920 So.2d 497 (2006) HARRISON COUNTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Appellant v. Henry W. KINNEY, Appellee. No. 2004-CA-00901-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. January 17, 2006. *498 Walter James White, Gulfport, Henry Allen, attorneys for appellant. Reilly Morse, Gulfport, attorney for appellee. Before KING, C.J., CHA

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 14, 2004 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALLEN KEN KINNEY, III Appeal from the Circuit Court for Obion County Nos. 3-314 & 3-315 William B. Acree, Jr., Judge No. W2004-00215-CCA-R3-CD - Filed November 24, 2004 The defendant, Allen Ken Kinney, III, entered

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alex Abou-Hussein appeals the district court’s- order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Abou-Hussein v. Science Applications Int’l C

954 N.E.2d 1098 (2011) Jeffrey D. LACHER, et al., Appellant-Claimant, v. REVIEW BOARD OF the INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT, and Bemis Company, Incorporated, Appellees-Employer. No. 93A02-1102-EX-163. Court of Appeals of Indiana. October 13, 2011. *1100 Eric A. Frey, Frey Law Firm, Terre Haute, IN, Attorney for Appel

OPINION WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice. In cause number 14-12-00963-CV, Michael E. Fitzmaurice appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss Harvella Jones’s suit against him. In cause number 14-12-01121-CV, William Fitzmaurice, Dorothy Fitzmaurice, Gregory Brumbaugh, and Karen McClure appeal from the trial court’s order denying th

BARBARA MILANO KEENAN, Circuit Judge: In 2007, Northrop Grumman entered into a contract with DynCorp, which served as a subcontract for DynCorp to supply personnel in support of Northrop Grumman’s performance of a prime contract with the United States Department of Defense. A dispute arose regarding DynCorp’s billing practices and, in March 2015, Northrop Grumman filed suit agai