⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gregory Baker”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021-04-26 · Published · cited 11× · 994 F.3d 1154
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GREGORY BOLIN, No. 15-99004 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:07-cv-00481- MMD-VPC RENEE BAKER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, OPINION Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from t
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012-09-20 · Published · cited 0× · 97 So. 3d 338; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 15801; 2012 WL 4127269
PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. Mathews v. Risk Management, 16 So.3d 230 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009). PADOVANO, THOMAS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015-07-28 · Published · cited 1× · 118 F. Supp. 3d 985; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97927; 2015 WL 4545182
ORDER PHILIP G. REINHARD, District Judge. For the reasons stated below, the defendants’ motion to strike [106] is denied and defendants’ motion for summary judgment [86] is granted as to Dr. Dominguez and *988Dr. Funk and granted in part and denied in part with regard to Wexford. The parties are directed to contact Magistrate Judge Ia
Baker v. Verretpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008-11-19 · Published · cited 0× · 998 So. 2d 320; 2008 WL 4925776
EZELL, Judge. For the reasons expressed in the consolidated case of 08-355, Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker, et al., (11/19/08), 998 So.2d 308, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, costs of this appeal are split half to the Copeland parties and half to BCM and Nawlins. AFFIRMED.
Baker v. Verretpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008-11-19 · Published · cited 0× · 998 So. 2d 320; 8 La.App. 3 Cir. 357; 2008 La. App. LEXIS 1924
EZELL, Judge. For the reasons expressed in the consolidated case of 08-355, Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker, et al., (11/19/08), 998 So.2d 308, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, costs of this appeal are split half to the Copeland parties and half to BCM and Nawlins. AFFIRMED.
Gregory v. Bakerpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001-02-27 · Published · cited 1× · 38 S.W.3d 473; 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 315; 2001 WL 204835
AHRENS, Presiding Judge. Kevin Todd Baker (“defendant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court awarding Tina Gregory and Larry E. Booth (“plaintiffs”) damages resulting from an automobile accident that occurred December 13, 1993. Defendant claims that the trial court lacked jurisdiction because the case had previously been dismissed. We affirm. Plaintiffs filed their petition on July 30, 1996 alleging pe
In re Gregorypublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017-06-14 · Published · cited 0× · 572 B.R. 220; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 1631
MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING WELLS FARGO’S MOTION TO ORDER DEBTOR TO DISMISS STATE COURT ACTION AND TO ENFORCE SWORN PROMISE TO SURRENDER PROPERTY TO WELLS FARGO OR OTHERWISE REAFFIRM OR REDEEM COLLATERAL Cynthia A. Norton, United States Chief Bankruptcy Judge The court is asked to consider the meaning of the word “surrender” in § 521(a)(2)(A)1 in an unusual context: where a sec
Glod v. Bakerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2009-02-20 · Published · cited 0× · 1 So. 3d 497; 2009 La. LEXIS 1373
In re Copeland’s of New Orleans, Inc.;— Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certio-rari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. G, Nos. 97-5864, 98-0483, 98-0482, 98-0481; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Nos. CA 08-355, CA 08-356, CA 08-357, CA 08-358. Denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant. VICTORY, J., would grant.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-09-13 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered September 13, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00954-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered July 26, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00954-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered July 2, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00954-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-08-26 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered August 26, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00954-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-06-06 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered June 6, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00954-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-03-29 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered March 29, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00954-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-07-19 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered July 19, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00954-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas Co
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2019-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered March 25, 2019 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00954-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Baker v. Gibbonspublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017-01-17 · Published · cited 0× · 795 S.E.2d 157; 2017 WL 164465; 2017 N.C. App. LEXIS 6
ELMORE, Judge. Lachey Baker (plaintiff) appeals from an order of summary judgment in favor of Jeffrey Gibbons, M.D., Garon R. Strong, PA-C, and Sandhills Emergency Physicians, P.A. (collectively, defendants), on plaintiff's negligence claim. We affirm. I. Background On 14 January 2011 at approximately 10:30 p.m., plaintiff brought her eleven-year-old son, David,1
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2018-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
Order entered December 19, 2018 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00954-CV IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF LORIE RUTH BAKER AND GREGORY JOSEPH FINSTER On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Lowder v. Gregorypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014-12-10 · Published · cited 7× · 2014 Ark. App. 704; 451 S.W.3d 220; 2014 Ark. App. LEXIS 1035
LARRY D. VAUGHT, Judge | Appellants Christa Gregory Lowder and Robert Edward Lowder appeal from an order awarding custody of their biological children to Christa’s former husband, appellee David Gregory. Appellants raise numerous assignments of error, none of which warrant reversal. We therefore affirm the custody order.
Glod v. Bakerpublic domain
Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2005-03-18 · Published · cited 0× · 896 So. 2d 1001; 2005 La. LEXIS 751; 2005 WL 844940
In re Verret, Chris A.; — -Defendant; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Div. G, Nos. 97-5864-G, 98-0481-B, 98-0782-E, 98-0483-1; to the *1002Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No(s). CW 04-00855, CW 04-00774. Denied.