Cases

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correct

678 F.Supp. 1336 (1988) SCHWINN BICYCLE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. ROSS BICYCLES, INC., a New York corporation, Defendant. No. 87 C 0914. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. January 25, 1988. *1337 *1338 Richard L. Reinish, Donald G. Mulack, Malcolm McCaleb,

Case: 23-1552 Document: 57 Page: 1 Filed: 01/17/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NEENA BISWAS, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent ______________________ 2023-1552 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ TROY W. MILLER, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondent ______________________ 2015-3149 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA-1221-11-0401-W-3. ________________

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. An intensive-care nurse at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in the Leeds section of Northampton, Massachusetts (the Leeds VAMC) was convicted of murdering four patients and attempting to murder three others between August 1995 and February 1996 by injecting them with epinephrine, a stimulant that in large doses can trigger heart attacks. See Sk

BY JUDGE JOHN J. MCGRATH, JR. This case is currently before this court on Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to prohibit the Defendant from eliciting any testimony from G. Edward Chappell, M.D., regarding his opinions of Ms. McCoy’s case, treatment, or condition. The dispositive facts of this case follow. On June 6,1997, Plaintiff and Defendant were involved in an automobile accident wherein Defendant allegedly

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CHERYL P. FRANCIS,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOOZ, ALLEN & HAMILTON, INCORPORATED,  No. 05-1523 Defendant-Appellee. RESERVE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, Amicus Supporting Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court fo

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CALVIN BOTLEY, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion for Permission to Take Discovery of Class Members (# 1010), which after considering the pleadings and the applicable law, finds that the motion is meritorious and should be granted in part. The class members in this litigation are companies who use specialty steel in designing

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. The Arkansas State Highway Commission (Commission) initiated this maritime action to recover the expenses it incurred in repairing the bridge that spans the Mississippi River at Helena, Arkansas. The bridge was damaged when the Arkansas River Co.’s pushboat, the M/V James R. Hines {Hines), rammed a dragline barge into the underside of t

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION; CHARLENE COZART, Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 96-1080 v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-95-1114-A) Argued: December 5, 1996 Decided: January 28, 1997 Before HALL and NIEMEY

*1301 PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This bankruptcy appeal involves a transfer of liens by subsidiaries of TOUSA, Inc., to secure the payment of a debt owed only by their parent, TOUSA. On July 31, 2007, TOUSA paid a settlement of $421 million to the Senior Transeastern Lenders with loan proceeds from the New Le

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge, dissenting in part and concurring in part, joined by Judges SCHROEDER and GRABER: Our antitrust law reflects Congress’s judgment that, with rare and specific exceptions, free competition for customers among firms protects and benefits the public by increasing efficiency and output, lowering prices, and improving the quality

NUMBER 13-02-659-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DIS

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 02-1515 LINDA SIMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States District Cou

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Federal Reporter or U.S.App.D.C. Reports. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of any formal errors in order that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 13, 2004 Decided November 26, 2004 No. 03-7079 UNITED STATES OF

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. SENTELLE, Circuit Judge: Petitioners challenge an FAA Interim Final Rule imposing annual fees totaling nearly $100 million on flights that neither take off from nor land in the United States. We reject their claims that the FAA acted unlawfully in employing an expedited procedure which precluded a roun

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

660 F.Supp.2d 1163 (2009) UNITED GUARANTY MORTGAGE INDEMNITY CO., Plaintiff, v. COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL CORP., et al., Defendants. Case No. CV-09-1888-MRP (JWJx). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 5, 2009. *1168 Neil G. Cave, Peter N. Tsapatsaris, Philippe Z. Selendy, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges

ERVIN, Chief Judge: Appellant Julia Lucas challenges the district court’s decision against her in a Title VII 1 employment discrimination action she brought against her employer, the Federal Aviation Administration. Ms. Lucas, who is white, alleges that her employer engaged