Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Greenbaum v. Islamic Republic”
Steven Greenbaum v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 1, 2022 Decided May 9, 2023 No. 22-5080 STEVEN M. GREENBAUM, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JUDITH (SHOSHANA) LILLIAN GREENBAUM, DECEASED, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ET AL., APPELLEES Cons
Greenbaum v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
782 F.Supp.2d 893 (2008) Steven M. GREENBAUM, Alan Hayman, and Shirlee Hayman, Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Case No. CV 08-0740 GAF (SSx). United States District Court, C.D. California. July 8, 2008. *894 Robert J. Perkiss, Cook Collection Attorneys, David J. Cook, Cook Collection Attorneys APLC, S
Greenbaum v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
451 F.Supp.2d 90 (2006) Steven M. GREENBAUM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 02-2148 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 10, 2006. *91 *92 *93
Stearns v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLEY STEARNS, et al., Plaintiffs, y Case No. 17-cv-131 (RCL) THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is the Special Master’s ninth report and recommendations regarding damages in this case. ECF No. 146. For the reasons stated below, the Court adopts each of the damages recommendations provided by the Special Master. I. . BACKGROUND This civil action arises from a series of attacks involving
Nahadi v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIWA NAHADI, et al. Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 23-cv-601 ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al. Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On March 6, 2023, Plaintiffs Shiwa Nahadi, Tara Mahmoudzadeh, and the Estate of Omer Mahmoudzadeh filed this s
Karcher v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TIMOTHY KARCHER, et al., Plaintiffs, y Civil Action No. 16-00232 (CKK) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (December 27, 2023) I. INTRODUCTION This Memorandum Opinion addresses the following categories of recommended damages awards, as set forth by the Special Master in his [146, 147, 148] [sealed] Reports!: (1) the assault, battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims for four Plaintiffs injure
Maxwell v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAXWELL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 22-173 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 20, 29, 35
Gunn v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MONA GUNN, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 21-1187 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 22, 23, 31 : I
Roth v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ZACHARY CARL ROTH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 1:19-cv-02179-TNM ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Soldiers injured in Iraq and Afghanistan and their families sued Iran for financing terrorists who a
Taitt v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SEAN TAITT, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 20-1557 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 19 :
Stearns v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHIRLEY STEARNS, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:17-cv-131-RCL V. *FILED UNDER SEAL* THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN unsealed October 3, 2022
Tratner v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM "JACK" BAXTER, et al., Plaintiffs, V. Case No. 1:18-cv-1078-RCL SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC, et al., Defendants. BARUCH TRATNER, et al., Plaintiffs, V. Case No. 1:18-cv-2971-RCL ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, eta/., Defen
Alinejad v. Iran, the Islamic Republic ofpublic domain
Case 1:19-cv-03599-GMH Document 34 *SEALED* Filed 07/06/23 Page 1 of 65 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MASIH ALINEJAD, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-cv-3599 (GMH) v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff M
Bova v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHEN P. BOVA, et al. Plaintiffs, Case No. 15-cv-1074 (RCL) v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION This action is brought pursuant to the state-sponsored exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA
Barry v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEVIN BARRY, et al. : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 16-1625 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 34, 49, 53, 54
Bennett v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BENSON. GRABER, Circuit Judge: ORDER The opinion filed August 26, 2015, and reported at 799 F.3d 1281, is withdrawn. Because the court’s opinion is withdrawn, Appellant Bank Melli’s petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc is moot. - A superseding opinion will be filed concurrently with thi
Shoham v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) BATSHEVA SHOHAM, ) Individually and as Administrator ) to the Estate of Y ehuda Shoham ) ) Plaintiff, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ESTATE OF CHRISTOPHER BROOK FISHBECK, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 18-cv-2248 (CRC) v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs in this case, numbering over 1400, se
Bennett v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
*954ORDER The opinion and partial dissent filed February 22, 2016, and reported at 817 F.3d 1131, are amended by the opinion and partial dissent filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, Judges Thomas and Graber have voted to deny Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Benson has voted to grant the pe
Roth v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge Plaintiffs have brought claims pursuant to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”) against the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security (“MOIS”). They seek damages for injuries suffered as a result of a terrorist attack committed in Jer