Cases

73 F.3d 373 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Clo

19 F.3d 1443 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Cl

397 N.W.2d 438 (1986) TIME-SHARE SYSTEMS, INC., Respondent, v. Gary W. SCHMIDT, d.b.a. The Wooden Bird, et al., Appellants. No. C4-86-905. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. December 16, 1986. *439 Philip T. Colton, Gregory J. Holly, Maun, Green Law Firm, Bloomington, for respondent. William B. Simonet, Jr., Louis B. Oberhause

PER CURIAM. This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of Orange County. All parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court, concluding that there were no genuine issues of material fact, partially granted appellees’ motion and mandatorily enjoined the City of Orlando to develop and implement plans to bring the Bennett Road Sewage Treatment Plant into compliance with state standards by June 1,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-2036, 23-2049, 23-2050, 23-2052, 23-2053, 23-2054, 23-2057 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, A/K/A COFINA; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 20-1356 GIORGIO ZAMPIEROLLO-RHEINFELDT, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. INGERSOLL-RAND DE PUERTO RICO, INC.; TRANE PUERTO RICO, INC.; TRANE PUERTO RICO, LLC, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [H

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 23-2036, 23-2049, 23-2050, 23-2052, 23-2053, 23-2054, 23-2057 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO

*547OPINION CONCURRENTE DEL JUEZ DE APELACIONES SR. MARTINEZ TORRES — 96 DTA 146 San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 13 de agosto de 1996 El dictamen que este Tribunal emite hoy, confirma la sentencia de divorcio por adulterio a favor de la demandante-apelada y contra el demandado-apelado, a pesar que este último había presentado una reconvención para que se decretara

OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. The twenty-seven named plaintiff families in the case at bar, all residents of three public housing complexes located in Barceloneta, Puerto Rico (collectively “Plaintiffs”), bring a civil rights suit under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1986 against Defendants asserting violations of their rights under the United States Constitution. Specifically, Plaintiffs a

188 F.Supp.2d 684 (2002) Mark NEWBY, Plaintiff, v. ENRON CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Amalgamated Bank, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. Nos. CIV.A. H-01-3624, CIV.A. H-01-4198. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 9, 2002.

365 So.2d 1090 (1979) SILVER SAND COMPANY OF LEESBURG, INC., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. No. GG-33. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. January 10, 1979. Rehearing Denied January 30, 1979. *1092 Stephen P. Kanar of Fishback, Davis, Dominick & Simonet, Orlando, for petiti

332 So.2d 687 (1976) FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation, Appellant, v. Charles F. TAYLOR et al., Appellees. No. 75-1161. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 28, 1976. *689 Jeffrey S. O'Brien and Sam H. Mann, Jr., of Harrison, Greene, Mann, Rowe & Stanton, St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Appeal from an order and judgment of the district court (1) vacating a partial dismissal of condemnation proceedings by appellant-condemnor, Independent School District No. 273 in so far as the dismissal affected certain property owned by respondents Alfred A. Gross, William J. Olsen, and Deborah S. Olsen; (2) denying the condemnor's motion to allocate the commissioners' award as to part of such property; and (3) adjudging that respondents were entitled to the amounts awarded by the c

Murphy, Justice. We held in In re Trusteeship under Agreement with Mayo, 259 Minn. 91, 105 N. W. (2d) 900, which dealt with the administration of two inter vivos trusts, that changed economic conditions might permit deviation from investment provisions which forbade investment in corporate common stock. In the case before us we are asked to go a step further and hold that unforeseen economic conditions may authorize courts t

295 F.Supp. 87 (1969) EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO, a national banking association, Plaintiff, v. Sidney P. ABRAMSON, Defendant, and Homer A. Bonhiver, as Receiver of American Allied Insurance Company, Intervenor. No. 3-68 Civ. 24. D. Minnesota, United States District Court Third Division. January 24, 1969. *88 Best,

242 Minn. 549 (1954) JOHN E. CREW AND ANOTHER v. B.H. FLANAGAN AND ANOTHER, COPARTNERS d.b.a. STEARNS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, AND ANOTHER.[1] No. 36,181. Supreme Court of Minnesota. July 30, 1954. *550 Best, Flanagan, Rogers, Lewis & Simonet, for appellants. R.J. Quinlivan, Atwood & Quinlivan,</

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV

128 Cal.App.2d 582 (1954) RALPH BUCHANAN et al., Appellants, v. ENID NYE et al., Respondents. Civ. No. 20174. California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. One. Nov. 8, 1954. Hirson & Horn, Parker, Stanbury, Reese & McGee and Raymond G. Stanbury for Appellants. Joseph W. Jarrett for Respondents. MOSK, J. pro tem. [fn. *]

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

Mr. Justice Santana Becerra delivered the opinion of the Court. Appellant’s physical condition and health were set forth by the Industrial Commission in its resolution of September 13, 1963, which is now on review, in the following manner: “The injured party testified that she is a specialist in cooperatives and works for the Cooperative Development Admin