⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

3 opinions for “Green v. Manpower-Ann Arbor (231)”

District Court, N.D. New York · 2015-03-24 · Published · cited 2× · 94 F. Supp. 3d 302; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36299; 2015 WL 1311064
MEMORANDUMÍ-DECISION and ORDER LAWRENCE E. KAHN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION.308 II. LEGAL STANDARD . CO o co A. Voting Rights Act. CO o CO B. Gingles Framework. CO l — O III. FINDINGS OF FACT. T — ( A. Background. 1 — | 1. Parties. T — I 2. County Redist
Michigan Supreme Court · 1985-01-22 · Published · cited 716× · 363 N.W.2d 641; 420 Mich. 567
420 Mich. 567 (1984) 363 N.W.2d 641 ROSS v. CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY WILLIS v. NIENOW WILLIS v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES SIENER v. DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH ROCCO v. DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH REGULSKI v. MURPHY TREZZI v. DETROIT DISAPPEARING LAKES ASSOCIATION v. DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ZAVALA v. ZINSER
Bell v. Marylandpublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 1964-06-22 · Published · cited 326× · 12 L. Ed. 2d 822; 84 S. Ct. 1814; 378 U.S. 226; 1964 U.S. LEXIS 824
Mr. Justice Douglas, with whom Mr. Justice Goldberg concurs as respects Parts II-V, for reversing and directing dismissal of the indictment. I. I reach the merits of this controversy. The issue is ripe for decision and petitioners, who have been convicted of asking for service in Hooper’s restaurant, are entitled to an answer to their complaint here and now.