⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Green v. Camarillo”

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008-02-08 · Published · cited 218× · 518 F.3d 153; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 2814; 2008 WL 341544
518 F.3d 153 (2008) Alice CAMARILLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CARROLS CORPORATION, Magliocca Stores, Inc., Reeher Majik, Inc., El Rancho Foods, Inc. and Wendonie, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 06-4909-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: January 10, 2008. Decided: February 8, 2008. *154
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2017-07-27 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 27, 2017 NO. 03-16-00515-CR Daniel Camarillo Garcia, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee APPEAL FROM 340TH DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND GOODWIN
California Court of Appeal · 2025-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 8/5/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CAMARILLO SANITARY DISTRICT et al., F087362 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 22CECG02195) v. STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2017-07-27 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-16-00515-CR Daniel Camarillo Garcia, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 340TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C-15-0944-SA, THE HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008-02-08 · Published · cited 0×
06-4909-cv Camarillo v. Carrols Corp. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 _______________ 4 5 August Term, 2007 6 7 (Argued: January 10, 2008 Decided: February 8, 2008 ) 8 9 Docket No. 06-4909-cv 1
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 1998-11-19 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-97-00641-CR Daniel Camarillo Garcia, Appellant v. The Sta
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2008-02-15 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00314-CV Joann Duran Camarillo, Appellant v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2008-02-15 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-07-00314-CV Joann Duran Camarillo, Appellant v. Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 340TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. C-05-0081-CPS, HONORABLE JAY K. WEATHERBY, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDU
in Re Kenneth Greenpublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2009-01-15 · Published · cited 0×
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 15, 2009 Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 15, 2009. In The </
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
F^LEyD' l DIVISION II 10 114 JUN 24 Ati 9: 01
California Supreme Court · 2010-02-11 · Published · cited 204× · 48 Cal. 4th 32
48 Cal.4th 32 (2010) COMMITTEE FOR GREEN FOOTHILLS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS et al., Defendants and Respondents; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. No. S163680. Supreme Court of California. February 11, 2010. *38
California Supreme Court · 2010-02-11 · Published · cited 164× · 48 Cal. 4th 32; 224 P.3d 920; 105 Cal. Rptr. 3d 181; 40 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20045; 2010 Cal. LEXIS 874
48 Cal.4th 32 (2010) COMMITTEE FOR GREEN FOOTHILLS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SANTA CLARA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS et al., Defendants and Respondents; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY et al., Real Parties in Interest and Respondents. No. S163680. Supreme Court of California. February 11, 2010. *38
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2009-09-01 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Opinion filed September 1, 2009. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2008-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
Appellees= Motion for Rehearing En Banc Granted; Opinion of March 27, 2007 Withdrawn; Affirmed and Majority, Concurring, and Dissenting Opinions on En Banc Rehearing filed July 15, 2008 Appellees= Motion for Rehearing En Banc Granted; Opinion of March 27, 2007 Withdrawn; Affirmed and Majority, Concurring, and Dissenting
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2009-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 18, 2009 Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 18, 2009. In The
In Re Labruzzopublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2005-08-10 · Published · cited 1× · 224 S.W.3d 277; 2005 WL 1593753
224 S.W.3d 277 (2005) In re Donald V. LABRUZZO, Carlos Camarillo and Plasticos Promex, USA, Inc. No. 08-05-00204-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. July 7, 2005. Rehearing Overruled August 10, 2005. Corey W. Haugland, James, Goldman & Haugland, P.C., El Paso, for relators. Steven L. Hughes, Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi & Galatzan, El Paso,
In Re Labbruzzopublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2006-08-10 · Published · cited 0× · 225 S.W.3d 634; 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 7090; 2006 WL 2328558
225 S.W.3d 634 (2006) In re Donald V. LABBRUZZO, Carlos Camarillo, and Plasticos Promex U.S.A., Inc. No. 08-06-00210-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. August 10, 2006. Corey W. Haugland, James, Goldman & Haugland, P.C., Thomas E. Stanton, El Paso, for relators. Steven L. Hughes, Mounce, Green, Myers, Safi & Galatzan, El Paso, for real party in interest.
Hernandez v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-09-21 · Published · cited 7× · 531 S.W.3d 359
OPINION MIKE WILLSON, JUSTICE The jury convicted Appellant of three counts of the offense of endangering a child and assessed her punishment at confinement for two years for each conviction. However, the jury recommended that the trial court suspend the imposition of Appellant’s sentence. The trial court followed the jury’s recommendation, suspended the imposition of the sentence and placed Appellant on c
State v. N.B.public domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019-03-07 · Published · cited 12× · 436 P.3d 358
Korsmo, J. *832¶1 N.B. appeals from a juvenile court adjudication for first degree child molestation, arguing that *833the trial judge's comments concerning the victim amounted to improper evidence against him that he could not confront. The court's reason