Cases

159 F.Supp.2d 1086 (2001) Kenneth GRAY, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants. No. 00 C 6950. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 29, 2001. *1087 Eric V. Puchala, Law Office of Eric V. Puchala, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Mara Stacy Georges, City of Chicago, Law Department Corpo

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBEN CASTILLO, District Judge. Oscar Walden, Jr. (“Plaintiff’ or “Walden”) sued several Chicago Police officers and the City of Chicago (“City” or “Defendant”), alleging multiple federal and state law claims of police misconduct relating to his arrest and prosecution for rape in 1952.1 (R. 1, Compl.) Once this delayed lawsuit was transf

755 F.Supp.2d 942 (2010) Oscar WALDEN, Jr., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendant. No. 04 C 0047. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 21, 2010. *945 John Ladell Stainthorp, Amber Miller, G. Fhnt Taylor, Jr., People's Law Offices, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff Andrew M. Hale, Avi

567 F.3d 976 (2009) Jacqueline GRAY; Windhover, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF VALLEY PARK, MISSOURI, Defendant-Appellee. Eagle Forum Education and Legal Defense Fund; Allied Educational Foundation; Brian Bilbray; Steve King; Lamar Smith; Washington Legal Foundation, Amici on behalf of Appellee. No. 08-1681. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted

872 N.E.2d 368 (2007) The CITY OF CHICAGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMCAST CABLE HOLDINGS, L.L.C., f/k/a AT & T Broadband, L.L.C.; Comcast of Chicago, Inc., f/k/a Communications & Cable of Chicago, Inc.; Comcast of Illinois Ill, Inc., f/k/a LaSalle Telecommunications, Inc.; Comcast of South Chicago, Inc., f/k/a South Chicago Cable Inc.; Comcast of Florida/Illinois/Michigan, Inc., f/k/a Prime Communications-Chicago, L.L.C.; RCN Cable TV of

JUSTICE CAMPBELL delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, the City of Chicago (City), appeals from an order of the circuit court of Cook County dismissing its action to recover certain cable franchise fees from defendants, multiple companies that provide Internet and cable service in Chicago, including Comcast,1 RCN Cable TV o

2025 IL App (1st) 231132 FIFTH DIVISION February 28, 2025 No. 1-23-1132 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT Appeal from the Circ

17 F.Supp.2d 753 (1998) Richard BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants, and Carole Bialczak, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Nos. 92 C 1683, 92 C 2104 and 92 C 2666. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. August 7, 1998. *754 Judson H. Miner, Miner Barnhill & Galland

2023 IL App (1st) 211317 SIXTH DIVISION December 1, 2023 No. 1-21-1317 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT MICHAEL W. UND

2024 IL App (1st) 221232 SIXTH DIVISION January 5, 2024 No. 1-22-1232 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT STEVEN TAYLOR, Independent Administrator on

Plaintiff, the City of Evanston, filed a complaint against the defendants, the City of Chicago and Joseph Boyle,1 commissioner of the Department of Transportation, seeking a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove a 2,000-foot guardrail median that the defendants installed in the center of Howard Street. The center of Howard Street marks the boundary between Evanston and Chicago; Evanston lies to the north and Chicago

952 F.Supp. 1265 (1997) Richard BARNETT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants, and Carole Bialczak, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Mary BONILLA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants, and Carole Bialczak, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. Nos. 92 C 1683, 92 C 2104 and 92 C 2666. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Divi

MEMORANDUM OPINION BRIAN BARNETT DUFF, District Judge. INTRODUCTION A. The Trial Proceedings 1. The trial of this case lasted for 48 trial days commencing on February 28, 1996 and concluding on August 1, 1996.1 There was a lengthy hiatus in the trial between April 4, 1996 and June 25, 1996 necessitated by a serious injury suffer

369 F.Supp.2d 989 (2005) T & B LIMITED, INC., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant. No. 04C2578. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. May 13, 2005. *990 *991 William Kevin Kane, Kane, Carbonara & Mendoza, Ltd., Allison Seger Noback, Kane, Carbonara & M

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2467 TABATHA WASHINGTON and DONTE HOWARD, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

2024 IL App (1st) 221794 No. 1-22-1794 Order filed March 28, 2024 Fourth Division NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and is not precedent except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). IN THE

601 N.E.2d 745 (1992) 151 Ill.2d 197 176 Ill.Dec. 47 Ronald B. GRAIS, Appellant, v. The CITY OF CHICAGO et al., Appellees. No. 72842. Supreme Court of Illinois. October 1, 1992. *747 Kevin M. O'Keefe, O'Keefe, Ashenden, Lyons & Ward, Chicago, for Ronald B. Grais. Kelly R.

472 F.Supp.2d 172 (2007) Albert L. GRAY, Administrator, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey DERDERIAN, et al., Defendants. Estate of Jude B. Henault, et al., Plaintiffs, v. American Foam Corporation, et al., Defendants. In re Motions to Dismiss of Defendants Polar Industries, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. C.A. Nos. 04-312L, 03-483L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island.</

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. The International College, of Surgeons and the United States Section of the International College of Surgeons (collectively the “College”) applied to the Commission on Chicago Historical and Architectural Landmarks (the “Landmarks Commission”) for the demolition permits required to redevelop certain landmarked property on Lake Shore Drive in Chicago. The Landmarks Commission denied this application a

464 F.Supp.2d 105 (2006) Albert L. GRAY, Administrator, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey DERDERIAN, et al., Defendants. Estate of Jude B. Henault, et al., Plaintiffs, v. American Foam Corporation; et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 04-312L, 03-483L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. December 12, 2006. *106 Patric