Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gray v. Ameris Bank”
Linda A. Gibson, Formerly Known of the Paul William Gibson Family Trust, & Heritage Seven, LLC v. Ameris Bankpublic domain
LOCKEMY, C.J.: **538A master-in-equity entered judgment in the amount of $2,913,866.00 against Ameris Bank (Ameris) for breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty claims asserted by Linda Gibson, individually and as trustee of the Paul William Gibson Family Trust (the Trust), and He
MEMORANDUM DECISION Andrew B. Altenburg, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge INTRODUCTION Before the court is an adversary proceeding of Andrew Sklar, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Global Protection USA, Inc. (the “Trustee”)1 against Susquehanna Bank (the “Bank”), seeking avoidance of certain transfers. After four days of trial, including te
Deutsche Bank AG v. Sebastian Holdings, Inc.public domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Amerypublic domain
Gose, J. The plaintiff, as a trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Syphers Machinery Company, a corporation, brought this action for the purpose of recovering from the defendant $5,500, paid to him by the bankrupt corporation for 5,500 shares of its capital stock, alleging that he sold the stock to it prior to the time it was adjudged a bankrupt, *649and that it thereb
Brandt v. Davispublic domain
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 19-P-1189 Appeals Court BROOKE A. BRANDT
Gibson v. Eptingpublic domain
HILL, J.: **348Linda Gibson and several of her companies-Heritage Seven, LLC, Seven Oaks Apartments, LLC, and 3205 Palm Boulevard, LLC (collectively, Gibson)-appeal the circuit court order granting summary judgment to Andrew Epting, Jr., George J. Kefalos, Gedney M. Howe, III, John S. West, and their respective law firms (collectively, Responde
Great Plains Lending, LLC v. Department of Bankingpublic domain
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Raymond Loubier Irrevocable Trust v. Noella Loubierpublic domain
REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge: The parties in this action are involved in an inheritance dispute pertaining to the assets of the now deceased Raymond Lou-bier, as conveyed to various revocable and irrevocable trusts in his name and that of his wife Noella Loubier. Two of the Loubiers’- irrevocable trusts, as well as a contingent trust b
United States v. Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE Let’s see if I’ve got this straight.1 Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Iric. (“Aeger-ion”) developed an effective medicine, called Juxtapid, to treat high cholesterol in people with a rare genetic disease. The treatment did not come cheap. “At market launch in January
MILAZZO, District Judge: Appellant McLane Foodservice, Inc. (“McLane”) filed suit to recover certain debts owed by Table Rock Restaurants, LLC (“Table Rock”) for goods and services provided by McLane in 2010. McLane also sought to recover the debts from Appellee Scot Wederquist (“Weder-quist”) by virtue of a guaranty agreement. Following a one-day bench trial, the district court
NRC v. Texaspublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 2 Pages 665–713 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 18, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Idlibi v. Hartford Courant Co.public domain
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Jones v. Amerihealth Caritaspublic domain
MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, District Judge. In this employment race and sex discrimination, harassment and retaliation case, the employer and supervisor defendants raise a wide variety of exhaustion and merits arguments seeking to dismiss some or all of the claims in the employee’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Several issues on informal complaints as the basis for a retaliation claim and the availa
Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPApublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 1 Pages 100–145 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Friedman v. Wheat First Securities Inc.public domain
64 F.Supp.2d 338 (1999) Philip FRIEDMAN and Carl Defreitas, Plaintiffs, v. WHEAT FIRST SECURITIES INC., Defendant. No. 98 Civ. 8709 (RJW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 14, 1999. *339 *340 Joel M. Leifer & Associates, New York City, Joel M. Leifer, of counsel, for
MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 2017) [Dkts. ## 53, 54, 55, 56, 57] RICHARD. J. LEON, United States District Judge. For over a decade, D.C. Chartered Health Plan, Inc. (“Chartered”), contracted with the District of Columbia to'provide healthcare services to low-income residents of the District. Then,' in 2012, the District. became concer
Moore v. United Statespublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Margaret Stilwell v. American General Life Insuranpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 07-2613 & 07-2684 M ARGARET J. S TILWELL, H ALEY S TILWELL, H EIDI S TILWELL, JAMIE S TILWELL, and M EGAN S TILWELL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A MERICAN G ENERAL L IFE INSURANCE C OMPANY, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellee, Cross-Ap
Moore v. United Statespublic domain
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 572–652 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
United States v. Jordan Leahypublic domain
USCA11 Case: 22-13822 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2025 Page: 1 of 92 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13822 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,