⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gray v. Ameris Bank”

Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017-05-24 · Published · cited 1× · 804 S.E.2d 276; 420 S.C. 536; 2017 WL 2264822; 2017 S.C. App. LEXIS 45
LOCKEMY, C.J.: **538A master-in-equity entered judgment in the amount of $2,913,866.00 against Ameris Bank (Ameris) for breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, and aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty claims asserted by Linda Gibson, individually and as trustee of the Paul William Gibson Family Trust (the Trust), and He
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2016-02-26 · Published · cited 3× · 546 B.R. 586; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 609
MEMORANDUM DECISION Andrew B. Altenburg, Jr., United States Bankruptcy Judge INTRODUCTION Before the court is an adversary proceeding of Andrew Sklar, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Global Protection USA, Inc. (the “Trustee”)1 against Susquehanna Bank (the “Bank”), seeking avoidance of certain transfers. After four days of trial, including te
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025-11-11 · Published · cited 1× · 236 Conn. App. 330
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Washington Supreme Court · 1913-04-08 · Published · cited 0× · 72 Wash. 648; 131 P. 199; 1913 Wash. LEXIS 2136
Gose, J. The plaintiff, as a trustee in bankruptcy for the estate of Syphers Machinery Company, a corporation, brought this action for the purpose of recovering from the defendant $5,500, paid to him by the bankrupt corporation for 5,500 shares of its capital stock, alleging that he sold the stock to it prior to the time it was adjudged a bankrupt, *649and that it thereb
Brandt v. Davispublic domain
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2020-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us 19-P-1189 Appeals Court BROOKE A. BRANDT
Gibson v. Eptingpublic domain
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019-01-09 · Published · cited 27× · 827 S.E.2d 178; 426 S.C. 346
HILL, J.: **348Linda Gibson and several of her companies-Heritage Seven, LLC, Seven Oaks Apartments, LLC, and 3205 Palm Boulevard, LLC (collectively, Gibson)-appeal the circuit court order granting summary judgment to Andrew Epting, Jr., George J. Kefalos, Gedney M. Howe, III, John S. West, and their respective law firms (collectively, Responde
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2021-05-20 · Published · cited 3× · 339 Conn. 112
*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017-06-01 · Published · cited 98× · 858 F.3d 719; 2017 WL 2366498; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 9643
REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judge: The parties in this action are involved in an inheritance dispute pertaining to the assets of the now deceased Raymond Lou-bier, as conveyed to various revocable and irrevocable trusts in his name and that of his wife Noella Loubier. Two of the Loubiers’- irrevocable trusts, as well as a contingent trust b
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017-11-20 · Published · cited 0× · 280 F. Supp. 3d 217
MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE Let’s see if I’ve got this straight.1 Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Iric. (“Aeger-ion”) developed an effective medicine, called Juxtapid, to treat high cholesterol in people with a rare genetic disease. The treatment did not come cheap. “At market launch in January
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013-11-15 · Published · cited 48× · 736 F.3d 375; 2013 WL 6050127; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 23116
MILAZZO, District Judge: Appellant McLane Foodservice, Inc. (“McLane”) filed suit to recover certain debts owed by Table Rock Restaurants, LLC (“Table Rock”) for goods and services provided by McLane in 2010. McLane also sought to recover the debts from Appellee Scot Wederquist (“Weder-quist”) by virtue of a guaranty agreement. Following a one-day bench trial, the district court
NRC v. Texaspublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-18 · Published · cited 0× · 605 U.S. 665
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 605 U. S. Part 2 Pages 665–713 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 18, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024-08-27 · Published · cited 1× · 350 Conn. 557
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015-03-06 · Published · cited 26× · 95 F. Supp. 3d 807; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28218; 2015 WL 1033824
MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, District Judge. In this employment race and sex discrimination, harassment and retaliation case, the employer and supervisor defendants raise a wide variety of exhaustion and merits arguments seeking to dismiss some or all of the claims in the employee’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Several issues on informal complaints as the basis for a retaliation claim and the availa
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-20 · Published · cited 0× · 606 U.S. 100
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 1 Pages 100–145 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
District Court, S.D. New York · 1999-09-14 · Published · cited 8× · 64 F. Supp. 2d 338; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13981; 1999 WL 713866
64 F.Supp.2d 338 (1999) Philip FRIEDMAN and Carl Defreitas, Plaintiffs, v. WHEAT FIRST SECURITIES INC., Defendant. No. 98 Civ. 8709 (RJW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 14, 1999. *339 *340 Joel M. Leifer & Associates, New York City, Joel M. Leifer, of counsel, for
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-09-07 · Published · cited 0× · 270 F. Supp. 3d 72
MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 2017) [Dkts. ## 53, 54, 55, 56, 57] RICHARD. J. LEON, United States District Judge. For over a decade, D.C. Chartered Health Plan, Inc. (“Chartered”), contracted with the District of Columbia to'provide healthcare services to low-income residents of the District. Then,' in 2012, the District. became concer
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-20 · Published · cited 8× · 602 U.S. 572
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 07-2613 & 07-2684 M ARGARET J. S TILWELL, H ALEY S TILWELL, H EIDI S TILWELL, JAMIE S TILWELL, and M EGAN S TILWELL, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A MERICAN G ENERAL L IFE INSURANCE C OMPANY, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff, Appellee, Cross-Ap
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-20 · Published · cited 12× · 602 U.S. 572
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 602 U. S. Part 1 Pages 572–652 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 20, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 22-13822 Document: 58-1 Date Filed: 09/25/2025 Page: 1 of 92 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-13822 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,