Cases

ROBERT W. PRATT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Petitioner Rosendo Enriquez, now represented by counsel, was an inmate of the Iowa Department of Corrections serving a sentence on convictions for drug and firearm offenses in Muscatine County, Iowa. State v. Enriquez , No. 09-1460, 2011 WL 1584114, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Apr. 27

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY STAY OF § 2254 PETITION MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................848 A. State Proceedings.....................................................848

The appellants, V. C. Ludwick and Mrs. Nora Kelly, nephew and niece respectively of Mrs. Nancy C. Bailey, deceased, brought this action in the County Court to set aside the probate of Mrs. Bailey's will. The instrument was probated on October 3, 1944, purports to have been executed December 11, 1942, signed by Mrs. Bailey making her mark, and witnessed by Mrs. Maudie Flatt and Albert S. Jackson, who signed in two places, once under the heading "Witnesses", and the other the

James 0< Shackeleoed, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an action brought against the defendant, for- failing to deliver goods received by him as a common carrier. It appears from the record, the defendant was the owner of the Steamboat “Prince of Wales,” running between the port of New Orleans and the City of - Cairo, in the State of Illinois. On the 15th of May,

James 0< Shackeleoed, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an action brought against the defendant, for- failing to deliver goods received by him as a common carrier. It appears from the record, the defendant was the owner of the Steamboat “Prince of Wales,” running between the port of New Orleans and the City of - Cairo, in the State of Illinois. On the 15th of May,

882 F.2d 976 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2481, 1990 A.M.C. 57,58 USLW 2186,58 USLW 2227, 113 Lab.Cas. P 11,554 Mercedel W. MILES, Individually and as Administratrix of theSuccession of Ludwick Adam Torregano,Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,v.Clifford A. MELROSE, et al., Defendants,Apex Marine Corp., Westchester Marine Shipping Co., Inc.,and Archon Marine Co., Defendants-Third PartyPlainti

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00098-CV ___________________________ HOWARD ROSENSTEIN, Appellant V. PATRICIA CONDRON, Appellee On Appeal from the 271st District Court Wise County, Texas Trial Court No. CV21-07-515 Before Bassel, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

KARON OWEN BOWDRE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE As defendants frequently point out, and as courts regularly affirm, even the most deeply wounding conduct rarely gives rise to civil liability for the tort of outrage. Suffering offense from truly insulting conduct is sometimes an unfortunate fact of life, so the law understandably hesitates to impose money damages for causing emotional distress in the minds of others. But, in ve

272 F.Supp.2d 621 (2003) Joseph Edmund PUERTAS, Petitioner, v. William OVERTON, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, Nick Ludwick, Warden, Egeler Reception and Guidance Center, Michael Bouchard, Sheriff, Oakland County, Respondents. No. CIV.A.03-40157. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 17, 2003.

Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part, and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 22, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00284-CV PAUL G. PARSONS, Appellant V. TRICHTER & LEGRAND, P.C. AND GARY TRICHTER, Appellees On Appeal from the 164th District Court Harris County

MARTIN, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which KEITH, J., joined. BOGGS, J. (pp. 890-91), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. OPINION BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge. Kevin Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Following a jur

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA THE STATE OF NEVADA, No. 77955 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellant, vs. FILE TAHAM CRISTILLI, JUL 2 4 2020 Res • on

[Cite as State v. Sims, 2023-Ohio-1179.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ATHENS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case No. 21CA15 v. : GRANT ADRIAN MYQ

342 F.Supp.2d 649 (2004) Joseph Edmund PUERTAS, Petitioner, v. William OVERTON, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections, Nick Ludwick, Warden, Egeler Reception and Guidance Center, and Michael Bouchard, Sheriff, Oakland County, Respondents. No. CIV.03-40157. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. October 19, 2004.

OPINION AND ORDER BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge. In this civil action, plaintiffs Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel, Inc., contend that defendants Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC have infringed the following eight patents related to a telephone relay system between deaf and hearing users: United States Patents Nos. 5,909,-482, 6,233,314, 6,594,346, 6,603,835, 7,319,-

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.

251 Ga. 104 (1983) 303 S.E.2d 456 AYCOCK v. AYCOCK. 39329. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided June 7, 1983. *109 Robert G. Wellon, for appellant. Jones, Ludwick & Malone, Taylor W. Jones, Steven W. Ludwick, Timothy R. Brennan, for appellee. CLARKE, Justice. This is an

230 S.W.2d 850 (1950) STATE ex rel. KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO. v. GAULD et al. No. 41772. Supreme Court of Missouri, en Banc. June 13, 1950. *851 Ludwick Graves, Keith P. Bondurant, Kansas City, Alan Wherritt, Robert F. Sevier, Liberty, for appellant. Robert E. Coleberd, Francis G. Hale, Liberty, Lawson, Hale &

455 F.Supp.2d 483 (2006) Hattie Mae GREENE, Plaintiff, v. QUEST DIAGNOSTICS CLINICAL LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. No. 2:05-CV-00811-DCN. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. September 29, 2006. *484 *485 A. Christopher Potts, Hitchcock and Potts, Charleston,

609 F.Supp.2d 540 (2009) David EADY, Plaintiff, v. VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:06-3413-CWH. United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division. March 31, 2009. *544 Robert A. Kerr, Jr., Wendy L. Wilkie, Hagood and Kerr, Mt. Pleasant, SC, for Plaintiff. Brian C. Hey,