Cases

348 U.S. 222 (1955) UNITED STATES v. SHUBERT ET AL. No. 36. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 9-10, 1954. Decided January 31, 1955. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Philip Elman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Ass

Levy, J. It is contended that the complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action is one of libel based upon the following article published by defendant concerning plaintiffs: “ Shuberts Gouge $1,000 from Klein Brothers. “ Force Vaudeville Act to Buy Release — Klein and Imhoff Opening for Orpheum.

OPINION OF THE COURT Chief Judge Cooke. This case provides an interesting insight into the fierce competition in the television industry for popular performers and favorable ratings.- It requires legal resolution of a rather novel employment imbroglio. The issue is whether plaintiff American Broadcasting Companies, Incorporated (ABC), is entitled to equitable relief against defendant Warne

STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge. National Beauty Supply, Inc. (National) appeals from the dismissal by the district court1 of its third-party complaint against *1181La Maur Inc. (La Maur) for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.2 At this stage of the proceedings the issue is whether under a

481 F.Supp. 573 (1979) Eugene A. WAHL and Vibra Screw, Incorporated, Plaintiffs, v. REXNORD, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 76-791. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. January 25, 1979. On Motion for Reconsideration May 25, 1979. *574 *575 Freiden, Kirsten, Friedman &am;