Cases

Matter of Williams v Grau (2024 NY Slip Op 04659) Matter of Williams v Grau 2024 NY Slip Op 04659 Decided on September 27, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MARYANN GRAU and STEVEN A. GRAU, Appellants, v. US BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE OF THE TIKI SERIES III TRUST Appellee. No. 4D21-2430 [September 1, 2022] Appeal from the Circuit Court f

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Connour v. Grau, 2015 IL App (4th) 130746 Appellate Court SCOTT CONNOUR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HIRAM GRAU, Director Caption of State Police; and MICHAEL W. VORREYER, FOID Enforcement Manager of The Department of State Police, Defendants-Appellants, and THE McLEAN COUNTY STATE’S ATTORNEY, Defendant. District & No. Fo

People v Grau-Arango (2019 NY Slip Op 08487) People v Grau-Arango 2019 NY Slip Op 08487 Decided on November 21, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi

Aff. Cir. Ct. (Citrus)

Aff. Cir. Ct. (Citrus)

PER CURIAM. We affirm Charles Grau’s conviction and sentence for aggravated battery with great bodily harm, but remand for correction of two scriveners’ errors in the second amended probation .order. First, the order incorrectly reflects that Grau entered a guilty plea to the aggravated battery charge, rather than noting that Grau was found guilty following a jury trial. Second, the order conflicts with the trial court’s sente

PER CURIAM. Charles Grau appeals the judgment and sentence adjudging Grau guilty and sentencing him to consecutive sentences of fifteen years for Count I (aggravated battery) and twenty years for Count II (kidnapping), followed by five years of probation. Grau argues that: (1) the lower court fundamentally erred when it instructed the jury as to the uncharged alternative crime of aggravated battery; (2) the State failed to p

per curiam: Nos corresponde determinar si el Ledo. Ra-món B. Rivera Grau incurrió en conducta contraria al Có-digo de Etica Profesional, infra, al preparar varios contratos de opción de compraventa sobre unos predios sin segregar y autenticar las firmas de los comparecientes, a la vez que fungía como representante legal de la parte vendedora en un pleito sobre ejecución de una hipoteca garantizada por la finca matriz. <

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL Certiorari BANCO POPULAR DE Procedente del PUERTO RICO Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Recurrido Sala

PER curiam: f — I El Ledo. Juan Carlos Grau Díaz fue admitido al ejercicio de la profesión el 14 de enero de 1987. El 23 de agosto de 2004 la Directora de la Oficina de Inspección de Notarías nos sometió un informe en el que detalló una serie de deficiencias serias que existían en la obra notarial de Grau Díaz. El 3 de diciembre de 2004 emi-timos una resolución y le concedimos un término a Grau Díaz p

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § ISIDRO GRAU, No. 08-10-00326-CV § Appellant, Appeal from § v.

MEMORANDUM ** Richard S. Berry, Jean D. Berry, and Rose Quintero appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants and its denial of Richard Berry’s motion for partial summary judgment.1 We have jurisdiction to consider the issues raised on appeal, see 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280,

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III FRANCES ELIZABETH GRAU Certiorari CESANÍ procedente del Tribunal de Recurrida Primera Instancia, Sala v. KLCE

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ISIDRO GRAU, Appellant, v. GECU, Appellee. § § §

per curiam: Según surge del expediente personal del Ledo. José Orlando Grau Collazo (licenciado Grau), éste ha incumplido tanto con los requisitos dispuestos en el Regla-mento del Programa de Educación Jurídica Continua, se-gún enmendado, 4 L.P.R.A. Ap. XVII-E(1) como con el de-ber de mantener a este Tribunal informado de su dirección conforme la Regla 9(j) de nuestro Reglamento, según en-mendado, 4

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ISIDRO GRAU AND GRISELDA B. ' GRAU, No. 08-12-00168-CV ' Appellants, Appeal from the ' v.

per curiam: En el ejercicio de sus funciones, tanto los jueces como los abogados tienen la delicada encomienda de preservar el respeto y la confianza del pueblo en nuestro sistema de justicia. Dicha encomienda requiere de los miembros de la Judicatura una conducta intachable que se caracterice por el más alto grado de imparcialidad e inte-gridad y que responda a las normas que salvaguardan la independencia de su ministerio. Por o

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ August 06, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A19A2429. LA FIESTA MEXICAN RESTAURANT #6, INC. et al. v. NATHAN GRAU. Plaintiff Nathan Grau filed this civil action against defendants RLH Atlanta, LLC; Carlos Hernandez, Sr.; Maria Munoz; and several John Doe defendants.1 Hernandez and Munoz filed a motio

POLEN, C.J. Dr. Gerard Grau, the defendant in a medical malpractice case, timely appeals a nonfinal order that granted plaintiffs James and Brenda Wells’ motion to strike his pleadings and that entered a default on liability against him. We affirm. The Wellses mailed their notice of intent to sue Grau and his practice in 1997. They alleged that Grau committed medical malpractice in connection with Mr.