⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Grass v. Kettle”

North Dakota Supreme Court · 2023-03-03 · Published · cited 4× · 987 N.W.2d 350; 2023 ND 35
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 3, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT
State v. Moultriepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015-10-23 · Published · cited 1× · 182 So. 3d 1017; 2014 La.App. 1 Cir. 1535; 2015 La. App. LEXIS 2084; 2015 WL 6447684
MeDONALD, j., dissents. |,I respectfully disseht from-the majority’s opinion that thé ‘Seizure of the drugs was illegal, and I would affirm the'decision of the trial court in dénying the motion to suppress. I agree with the majority that the agents had a reasonable suspicion to . stop and question the defendant. Having done so, they were also justified in conducting a protective search for
Glass v. Gatespublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011-09-01 · Published · cited 28× · 716 S.E.2d 611; 311 Ga. App. 563; 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2791; 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 789
716 S.E.2d 611 (2011) 311 Ga. App. 563 GLASS et al. v. GATES et al. No. A11A1169. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 1, 2011. *613 Michael Lawson Neff, Atlanta, George Brian Spears, for appellants. Willis, McKenzie, DeGennaro & Alford, Mark Lawrence DeGennaro, La Grange, Freeman, Mathis &
Maier v. GISKEpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010-01-04 · Published · cited 29× · 223 P.3d 1265
223 P.3d 1265 (2010) James MAIER and Elizabeth Hendrix-Maier, husband and wife, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, v. Nancy GISKE, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. No. 62737-6-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. January 4, 2010. *1268 David F. Cooper, Vashon, WA, Thomas F. Peterson, Adam R. Asher, Socius Law Group, PLLC, Seattle
Mulle v. McCauleypublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007-07-31 · Published · cited 19× · 927 A.2d 921; 102 Conn. App. 803; 2007 Conn. App. LEXIS 318
927 A.2d 921 (2007) 102 Conn.App. 803 Theodore B. MULLE, Jr., et al. v. Brian McCAULEY et al. No. 27604. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued April 16, 2007. Decided July 31, 2007. *923 Gerald L. Garlick, Hartford, with whom, on the brief, was Katherine E. Abel, for the appellants (defen
District Court, District of Columbia · 2007-04-30 · Published · cited 0× · 242 F.R.D. 125; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 31168; 2007 WL 1241868
MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting In Part and Denying In Part the Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration1; Directing the Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint URBINA, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves the defendant’s alleged support of Hizbollah, a terrorist group that *1
Maier v. Giskepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010-01-04 · Published · cited 28× · 154 Wash. App. 6
Lau, J. ¶1 This appeal involves a series of real property disputes between two Vashon Island neighbors. James Maier and Elizabeth Hendrix-Maier filed suit against Nancy Giske, alleging that she constructed a fence and planted shrubbery to block their easement access. Giske disputed the easement’s validity and claimed the Maiers injured her plants and caused her bluff to collapse. She also sought to acquire parts of the Maiers’ prop
District Court, E.D. California · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 4× · 115 F. Supp. 3d 1171; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91536; 2015 WL 4369901
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiff National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry brought this action for trademark infringement against defendant California State Grange. Presently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
People v. Pedrozapublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2007-02-13 · Published · cited 6× · 54 Cal. Rptr. 3d 636; 147 Cal. App. 4th 784
54 Cal.Rptr.3d 636 (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 784 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Steve Christopher PEDROZA, Defendant and Appellant. In re Steve Christopher Pedroza, on Habeas Corpus. Nos. B189682, B194249. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Four. February 13, 2007. *637 Lyn
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2002-05-14 · Published · cited 23× · 563 S.E.2d 374; 38 Va. App. 253; 2002 Va. App. LEXIS 291
ELDER, Judge. Lee County School Board and Virginia Municipal Group Self-Insurance Association (hereinafter collectively “employer”) appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding benefits to employee Kitty Sue Miller (claimant) under the Workers’ Compensation Act. On appeal, employer contends claimant failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996-11-19 · Published · cited 1× · 933 S.W.2d 400; 1996 Mo. LEXIS 76; 1996 WL 668461
ROBERTSON, Judge, concurring in result in part and dissenting in part. The principal opinion concludes that the Old Warson Country Club (the Club) owes no sales tax on capital improvement assessments paid by members who maintain an equity interest in the Club. For emeritus *405members who no longer maintain an equity in
District Court, D. Nevada · 2009-02-06 · Published · cited 2× · 598 F. Supp. 2d 1118; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17330; 2009 WL 413520
Order EDWARD C. REED, JR., District Judge. This case arises from a dispute between an individual plaintiff, Steven Kroll, and defendants who include the Incline Village General Improvement District (“IVGID”), as well as the individual trustees of IVGID, sued in both their official and individual capacities. Before 1995, Plaintiff lived within the Crystal Bay General Improvement District (“CB
District Court, D. Nevada · 2009-02-06 · Published · cited 0× · 598 F. Supp. 2d 1118; 2009 WL 413520
598 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2009) Steven E. KROLL, Plaintiff, v. INCLINE VILLAGE GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, a/k/a IVGID, a governmental subdivision of the State of Nevada; John A. Bohn, Gene Brockman, Bea Epstein, Chuck Weinberger, and Robert C. Wolf, individually and as Trustees of IVGID; Does 1 through 25 inclusive, each in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. No. 3:08-CV-166-ECR-VPC. Uni
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-07-17 · Published · cited 17× · 439 F. Supp. 2d 53; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47977; 2006 WL 1975631
439 F.Supp.2d 53 (2006) Tarek REED, Plaintiff, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-2657 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 17, 2006. *54 *55 *56 *57 Emil Hirsc
District Court, N.D. California · 2012-01-24 · Published · cited 1× · 848 F. Supp. 2d 1036; 2012 WL 214927; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7664
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case challenges administrative actions and land management practices which allegedly impact the level of stock use in the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (“SEKI”). Plaintiff High Sierra Hikers Association (“HSHA”) asserts that defendants violated b
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00242-CV 6919167 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR PATRICK BLANKS, et al., ) No. ED97810 ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis vs. )
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014-09-16 · Published · cited 76× · 450 S.W.3d 308; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1013; 2014 WL 4589815
LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge. “Our Tigger.” That is what Austin Manning’s parents called him when he was a little boy, because he bounced around like Tigger from the classic tale, Winnie the Pooh. He never sat still for more than a second. At the time, the family thought it was cute. Little did they know of the problems to come.
District Court, E.D. Washington · 2002-03-29 · Published · cited 17× · 198 F. Supp. 2d 1211; 54 ERC (BNA) 2120; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12834; 2002 WL 726631
198 F.Supp.2d 1211 (2002) The LANDS COUNCIL, Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc., the Ecology Center, and the Kootenai Environmental Alliance, Plaintiffs, v. Robert VAUGHT and/or Rolando Ortegon, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Colville National Forest; David Wright, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Idaho Panhandle National Forests; and Mike Dombeck, Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, and agency of the U.S. Dept.
District Court, D. Oregon · 2001-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 163 F. Supp. 2d 1222; 31 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20692; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15602; 2001 WL 1141254
163 F.Supp.2d 1222 (2001) LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Kettle Range Conservation Group, a Washington nonprofit corporation; The Lands Council, a Washington nonprofit corporation; Hells Canyon Preservation Council, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; *1223 Oregon Natural Resources Council, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; American Lands, an Oregon non