Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Grass v. Kettle”
Boutrous v. Transform Operating Storespublic domain
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT MARCH 3, 2023 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT
State v. Moultriepublic domain
MeDONALD, j., dissents. |,I respectfully disseht from-the majority’s opinion that thé ‘Seizure of the drugs was illegal, and I would affirm the'decision of the trial court in dénying the motion to suppress. I agree with the majority that the agents had a reasonable suspicion to . stop and question the defendant. Having done so, they were also justified in conducting a protective search for
Glass v. Gatespublic domain
716 S.E.2d 611 (2011) 311 Ga. App. 563 GLASS et al. v. GATES et al. No. A11A1169. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 1, 2011. *613 Michael Lawson Neff, Atlanta, George Brian Spears, for appellants. Willis, McKenzie, DeGennaro & Alford, Mark Lawrence DeGennaro, La Grange, Freeman, Mathis &
Maier v. GISKEpublic domain
223 P.3d 1265 (2010) James MAIER and Elizabeth Hendrix-Maier, husband and wife, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, v. Nancy GISKE, Respondent/Cross-Appellant. No. 62737-6-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. January 4, 2010. *1268 David F. Cooper, Vashon, WA, Thomas F. Peterson, Adam R. Asher, Socius Law Group, PLLC, Seattle
Mulle v. McCauleypublic domain
927 A.2d 921 (2007) 102 Conn.App. 803 Theodore B. MULLE, Jr., et al. v. Brian McCAULEY et al. No. 27604. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued April 16, 2007. Decided July 31, 2007. *923 Gerald L. Garlick, Hartford, with whom, on the brief, was Katherine E. Abel, for the appellants (defen
Reed v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting In Part and Denying In Part the Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration1; Directing the Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint URBINA, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves the defendant’s alleged support of Hizbollah, a terrorist group that *1
Maier v. Giskepublic domain
Lau, J. ¶1 This appeal involves a series of real property disputes between two Vashon Island neighbors. James Maier and Elizabeth Hendrix-Maier filed suit against Nancy Giske, alleging that she constructed a fence and planted shrubbery to block their easement access. Giske disputed the easement’s validity and claimed the Maiers injured her plants and caused her bluff to collapse. She also sought to acquire parts of the Maiers’ prop
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Plaintiff National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry brought this action for trademark infringement against defendant California State Grange. Presently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
People v. Pedrozapublic domain
54 Cal.Rptr.3d 636 (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 784 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Steve Christopher PEDROZA, Defendant and Appellant. In re Steve Christopher Pedroza, on Habeas Corpus. Nos. B189682, B194249. Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Four. February 13, 2007. *637 Lyn
Lee County School Board v. Millerpublic domain
ELDER, Judge. Lee County School Board and Virginia Municipal Group Self-Insurance Association (hereinafter collectively “employer”) appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding benefits to employee Kitty Sue Miller (claimant) under the Workers’ Compensation Act. On appeal, employer contends claimant failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that
Old Warson Country Club v. Director of Revenuepublic domain
ROBERTSON, Judge, concurring in result in part and dissenting in part. The principal opinion concludes that the Old Warson Country Club (the Club) owes no sales tax on capital improvement assessments paid by members who maintain an equity interest in the Club. For emeritus *405members who no longer maintain an equity in
Order EDWARD C. REED, JR., District Judge. This case arises from a dispute between an individual plaintiff, Steven Kroll, and defendants who include the Incline Village General Improvement District (“IVGID”), as well as the individual trustees of IVGID, sued in both their official and individual capacities. Before 1995, Plaintiff lived within the Crystal Bay General Improvement District (“CB
Kroll v. INCLINE VILLAGE GENERAL IMP. DIST.public domain
598 F.Supp.2d 1118 (2009) Steven E. KROLL, Plaintiff, v. INCLINE VILLAGE GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT, a/k/a IVGID, a governmental subdivision of the State of Nevada; John A. Bohn, Gene Brockman, Bea Epstein, Chuck Weinberger, and Robert C. Wolf, individually and as Trustees of IVGID; Does 1 through 25 inclusive, each in their individual and official capacities, Defendants. No. 3:08-CV-166-ECR-VPC. Uni
Reed v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
439 F.Supp.2d 53 (2006) Tarek REED, Plaintiff, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-2657 (RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. July 17, 2006. *54 *55 *56 *57 Emil Hirsc
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case challenges administrative actions and land management practices which allegedly impact the level of stock use in the Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (“SEKI”). Plaintiff High Sierra Hikers Association (“HSHA”) asserts that defendants violated b
Guillermo Ochoa-Cronfel v. Patrick C. Murraypublic domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00242-CV 6919167 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Patrick Blanks v. Fluor Corporationpublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR PATRICK BLANKS, et al., ) No. ED97810 ) Respondents, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of the City of St. Louis vs. )
Patrick Blanks v. Fluor Corporationpublic domain
LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Presiding Judge. “Our Tigger.” That is what Austin Manning’s parents called him when he was a little boy, because he bounced around like Tigger from the classic tale, Winnie the Pooh. He never sat still for more than a second. At the time, the family thought it was cute. Little did they know of the problems to come.
Lands Council v. Vaughtpublic domain
198 F.Supp.2d 1211 (2002) The LANDS COUNCIL, Idaho Sporting Congress, Inc., the Ecology Center, and the Kootenai Environmental Alliance, Plaintiffs, v. Robert VAUGHT and/or Rolando Ortegon, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Colville National Forest; David Wright, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor of the Idaho Panhandle National Forests; and Mike Dombeck, Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, and agency of the U.S. Dept.
163 F.Supp.2d 1222 (2001) LEAGUE OF WILDERNESS DEFENDERS/BLUE MOUNTAINS BIODIVERSITY PROJECT, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; Kettle Range Conservation Group, a Washington nonprofit corporation; The Lands Council, a Washington nonprofit corporation; Hells Canyon Preservation Council, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; *1223 Oregon Natural Resources Council, an Oregon nonprofit corporation; American Lands, an Oregon non