Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION SETTING FORTH FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW TANYA S. CHUTEAN, District Judge Plaintiff Kevin Connor sued the United States, pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671, et seq. (the “FTCA”), for damages that he allegedly, sustained when a United States Postal Service

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s judgment filed March 21, 2003, be affirmed. The district court correctly concluded that under th

256 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2001) CLETE E. COURSEN, PETITIONERv.UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, RESPONDENT 00-3322 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit July 16, 2001 Appealed from: Merit Systems Protection BoardKevin A. Graham, Flook & Graham, P.C., of Liberty, Missouri, argued for petitioner.

204 F.3d 523 (4th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 99-1562 (CA-98-1355-A). UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Argued: November 30, 1999.Decided: February 25, 2000. Appeal from the United States Di

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DBW PARTNERS, LLC : d/b/a THE CAPITOL FORUM : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-3127 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 11

853 F.Supp. 800 (1994) UPS WORLDWIDE FORWARDING, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 93-340-JLL. United States District Court, D. Delaware. May 16, 1994. *801 *802 Arthur G. Connolly, Jr., Connolly, Bove, Lodge & Hutz, Wilmington, DE, and Robert L. Kend

671 F.Supp. 497 (1987) AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants. No. C-2-83-0195. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, E.D. October 7, 1987. *498 Leonard S. Sigall, Reynoldsburg, Ohio, for plaintiffs. Arnold S. White, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff G

643 F.Supp.2d 749 (2009) Gary T. SADOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. RDB 08-2940. United States District Court, D. Maryland. August 17, 2009. *750 Dilip B. Paliath, Preller and Preller, Towson, MD, for Plaintiff. Ariana Wright Arnold, Rodney M. Walls, Rod J. Rosenstein

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Over the course of fifty years, conservative political activist Phyllis M. Schlafly created numerous "educational, advocacy, and policy groups," each of which she branded with an "Eagle"-themed name. (Am. Compl., ECF No. 20, ¶¶ 30, 31.) Among those entities are plaintiffs Eagle Trust Fund ("ETF") and Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund ("EFE-LDF"), as well as non-party E

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE, Plaintiff, No. 20-cv-2295(EGS) v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiff, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (“NAACP”) filed this la

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DAVID BENNETT, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 24 - 3668 (LLA) UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff David Bennett, proceeding pro se, filed this suit pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5

PER CURIAM. In this Title VII action, the appellant, Lawrence Slade, contends that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint for failure to sue the proper party within the thirty-day statute of limitations. 1 Based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Schiavone v. Fortune, 477 U.S. 21, 106 S

BRORBY, Circuit Judge. After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. FACTS In 1971

Affirmed by published opinion. Senior Judge DAVIS wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge THACKER joined. Judge THACKER wrote a separate concurring opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote an opinion dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment. DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge: Appellants Aaron Graham and Erie Jordan appeal their convictions for several offenses arising from a series of armed robberies. Specifically,

231 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2000) WALTER BATEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; WILLIAM J. HENDERSON,1 Postmaster General, Defendants-Appellees,andAARON JOHNSON; BEN FUKUMITSU; DAVID BURNS; JOSE MALLARI, Defendants. No. 99-15394 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge, with whom COLLOTON, Circuit Judge, joins, dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc. I would grant rehearing en banc because I conclude that 18 U.S.C. § 2 does not require an indictment to allege that an aider and abettor shares the status element necessary to convict the principal of the particular offense at issue. The indictment here alleges that Looking Cloud is an Indian, there

CLAY, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which STAFFORD, D.J., joined. COOK, J. (pp. 424-27), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, B & B Trucking, Inc., et al., appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, entered on January 30, 2002, granting the motion of Defendant, United States Postal Service (“USPS”), to

363 F.3d 404 B & B TRUCKING, INC.; Causley Trucking, Inc.; Cliff Blackburn; Fedrizzi, Inc.; Foreman Bros., Inc.; George E. Campbell and Sons, Inc.; L.R. Vincent Truck and Service, Inc.; M.C. Eipperle, Inc.; Massman Trucking, Inc.; P-D Trucking, Inc.; Robert M. Neff, Inc.; Roth Trucking, Inc.; Royster Enterprises, Inc.; Sodrel Truck Lines, Inc.; Taylor Postal Contracting, Inc.; National Star Route Mail Contractors Association; B & B Industri

MEMORANDUM OPINION CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States. District Judge The United States Postal Service (“USPS”) permits the use of personalized postage stamps. Believing that a bespoke stamp would help publicize an upcoming gallery exhibition, local artist Anatol Zuk-erman submitted a proposed design— aimed at critiquing the Supreme Court’s Citizens Unite

OPINION SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant Vicki Steiner appeals from the district court’s dismissal of her Title VII claim for failure to exhaust her administrative remedies. The district court dismissed Steiner’s claim under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) because Steiner had failed to file her gender discrimination claim with an Equal Employment