Cases

733 F.Supp.2d 724 (2010) Kenneth O. GRAHAM, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 7:09-CV-132-BO. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division. August 22, 2010. *725 Barbara von Euler, Kathleen Shannon Glancy, PA, Wilmington, NC, for Plaintiff. Eskunder R.T

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DICKINSON, Presiding Justice, for the Court: ¶ 1. In this medical malpractice case, the defendant alleged the plaintiffs discovery response concerning his expert was insufficient. The trial judge ordered the plaintiff to produce the expert for a deposition but, due to illness, the expert was unable to attend the scheduled deposition. Without addressing whether the plaintif

This cause having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby

LEE, C.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Curtis L. Boyd sued Dr. Gregory Nunez, M.D., Vineyard Court Nursing Center (Vineyard), and several other de*125fendants for medical malpractice. Boyd settled with Vineyard, leaving Dr. Nunez as the only defendant. The trial court excluded the testimony of Boyd’s designated expert, Dr. John Payne, because it failed to satisfy the requirem

52 So.3d 455 (2011) Jeff BOYD and Nancy Boyd, Individually, and as Guardians and Next Friends of Samantha Boyd, Minor, Appellants v. MAGIC GOLF, INC. d/b/a Slippery Sam's, Appellee. No. 2009-CA-00691-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. January 25, 2011. *457 Catherine H. Jacobs, Ocean Springs, attorney for appellants. Mi

*342 MEMORANDUM & ORDER MAUSKOPF, District Judge. On February 5, 2009, United States Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 156) (the “Report and Recommendation”) recommending denial of plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 to certify a class of similarly situated individu

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.

Sweeney, J. — State courts have criminal jurisdiction over Indian tribal members, except for crimes committed on tribal trust land or allotted land.1 The trial court here concluded as a matter of law, based upon well-supported findings of fact, that the crimes committed by Michael James Boyd and Sheldon Lee Pakootas were neither on tribal trust land nor allotted land. We accordingly affirm the court’

¶ 1. Appellant Felix Graham was indicted by a Bolivar County grand jury for aggravated assault and possession of a deadly weapon by a convicted felon. Following a trial, the jury found Graham guilty of the crimes charged. At the sentencing, the trial court held a hearing pursuant to section 99-19-83 of the Mississippi Code and determined that Graham was a habitual, violent offender and sentenced him to life imprisonment on bot

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA 24-36 Filed 5 February 2025 Pasquotank County, Nos. 20 CRS 1372-73, 20 CRS 51101 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. BRANDON KASON BOYD Appeal by Defendant from judgments entered 15 March 2023 by Judge Jerry R. Tillett in Pasquotank County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 5 November 2024. Attorney General Jeff Jackson, by S

254 B.R. 399 (2000) In re Sheronda BOYD, Debtor. Sheronda Boyd, Plaintiff, v. U.S. Dept. of Education, et al., Defendants. No. 99-3088. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio. April 10, 2000. *400 *401 John N. Graham, Toledo, OH, Interim Trustee. Matthew Thompson, Columbus, OH, f

Case: 20-50945 Document: 00516831344 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/24/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED July 24, 2

People v Graham (2023 NY Slip Op 01819) People v Graham 2023 NY Slip Op 01819 Decided on April 6, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

[Cite as State v. Graham, 2022-Ohio-4752.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MAHONING COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ISRAEL GRAHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ZAGEL, District Judge. I have before me several post-trial motions, some filed past the time I allowed for them, some filed in disregard of any time limits. The Government says all the motions are too late. According to United States v. Hocking, 841 F.2d 735 (7th Cir.1988) and the plain language of the applicable Rules these motions “sha

I dissent from the majority opinion as it is my opinion that judgments passed on by this court should not be guided by sentimental or emotional feelings on the subject of the appeal. This court should pass its judgment even when doing so would be unpopular and painful. Appellant argues that the trial court erred by failing to advise him of his right to request conditional probation and by failing to grant a hearing on his motion for conditional probation. Any reason in the recor

[Cite as State v. Boyd, 2020-Ohio-3450.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 108552 v. : CHANTEL BOYD,

59 F.3d 166NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Ronald GRAHAM, Plaintiff--Appellant,and Michael A. RIDDICK; Mike J. Martin; Thomas L. McLamb, Plaintiffs,v.Edward MURRAY, Director; E.C. Morris, Deputy Director;