Cases

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Andrea Boxill brought this suit against four Ohio judges and a court administrator at Ohio's Franklin County Municipal Court (FCMC). 1 She makes several claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

546 F.3d 423 (2008) Frederick MOORE and Tommie Grady as Co-Administrators and Personal Representatives of the ESTATE OF Frederick GRADY, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Donald TULEJA, Demetrius Williamson, Joseph Palmsone, and Dennis Boyle, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-3137. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued May 29, 2008. Decided October 6, 2008

* * * * * * * * * * * Upon review of the competent evidence of record, with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence, or to rehear the parties or their *Page 2 representatives, the Full Commission, upon reconsideration of the evidence, affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, and enters the following Opinion and Award.

{¶ 1} This matter is before the court on the notice of appeal of Jeffrey A. Moore, filed April 13, 2005. Mr. Moore and his ex-wife, Sherrie Moore, obtained a final judgment and decree of divorce on June 23, 2003. Mr. Moore received custody of the parties' four children, one of whom is emancipated. The court ordered Mr. Moore to pay spousal support in the amount of $2,000 a month for 60 months, beginning on March 1, 2003. The court retained jurisdiction to modify support,

44 Cal.Rptr.3d 72 (2006) 139 Cal.App.4th 1423 Jason O'GRADY et al., Petitioners, v. The SUPERIOR COURT of Santa Clara County, Respondent; Apple Computer, Inc., Real Party in Interest. No. H028579. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. May 26, 2006. *76 Law Offices of Richard R. Wiebe, Richard R. Wiebe, Berm

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Fulton, Causey and Raphael PUBLISHED Argued at Lexington, Virginia ZACHARY GRADY, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ERIN JO BAKER, DECEASED OPINION BY v. Record No. 1520-23-3 JUDGE STUART A. RAPHAEL

07/26/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 5, 2018 DONALD K. MOORE, JR. v. GRADY PERRY, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardeman County No. CC-17-CR-165 Joe H. Walker, III, Judge ___________________________

381 S.C. 179 (2009) 672 S.E.2d 571 Carlyle McGILL, Appellant, v. Tracy MOORE, Rufus Alton Moore, Pearline Hutto, Estate of Bennie Moore, believed to be the above/below named persons, known or unknown, claiming thereunder, being named herein Jane Doe and Richard Roe, Estate of Vernice Alexander, believed to be William Alexander, Grady Alexander, and any and all persons, known or unknown, claiming under both Alexander estate

BRYANT, Judge. An association has representational standing to bring a lawsuit provided at least one of its members has suffered imminent harm. Where a defendant fails to join necessary parties to his action, a dismissal of his claim pursuant to N.C. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(7) is appropriate. Where a restrictive covenant must be enforced, a permanent injunction is the proper remedy. A

JORDAN, Circuit Judge: Dr. Ronald E. Moore, Jr. appeals the district court’s dismissal of his claims for race discrimination and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Exercising plenary review, see Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc. v. Beech Street Corp., 208 F.3d 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 2000), and with the benefit of oral argument, we affir

EARLS, Justice. *546**510The Fourth Amendment protects "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures" by the government. U.S. Const. amend. IV. The United States Supreme Co

96 F.Supp.2d 1154 (2000) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Ira L. MOORE, Defendant. No. Crim. 98-CR-193-WM. United States District Court, D. Colorado. May 18, 2000. *1155 Linda A. McMahan, James Allison, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Denver, CO, for plaintiff. Virgina Grady, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Denv

OPINION LIVELY, Circuit Judge. This long-running dispute involves the validity and alleged infringing use of a collective membership trademark registered by the plaintiff, Sovereign Order of Saint John of Jerusalem, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation). The defendant, John L. Grady, contests the validity of the mark on the ground that he, no

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of April 2004 by Board of General Contractors and N.C. Board of Pharmacy for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of April 2004."

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 18a0136p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TERESA BARRY, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │

OPINION {¶ 1} This case involves the attempted annexation of about 618.4 acres from Union Township to the City of Union, Ohio. In October, 2001, Joseph Moore, agent for several property owners, filed a petition with the Miami County Board of Commissioners (Board), asking that the owners' property be annexed to the City of Union. All property owners in the proposed annexation area had agreed to the annexation, except the M

OPINION NORRIS, Judge. ¶ 1 The issue in this special action is whether the superior court has discretion to deny a stay to a defendant in possession of property who is appealing a judgment in a forcible entry and detainer action when the plaintiff never had a landlord-tenant relationship with the defendant and, instead, purchased the property at a non-judicial trustee’s sale. As we explain, the answer is

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

01/12/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs September 1, 2020 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ROBERT EARL GRADY, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 18-839 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiffs in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is "Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004." Upon consi