Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gracie B Johnson”
In Re Gracie W.public domain
10/07/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs July 1, 2025 IN RE GRACIE W.1 ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Shelby County No. CT-0745-23 Cedrick D. Wooten, Judge
Johnson v. Greene Acres Nursing Home Ass'npublic domain
219 S.W.3d 138 (2005) Billy Dale JOHNSON, Executor of the Estate of Gracie Mears, Deceased, Appellant, v. GREENE ACRES NURSING HOME ASSOCIATION, Individually and d/b/a Greene Acres Nursing Home; Paragould Nursing and Rehabilitation Center; Dwight Williams, M.D.; and Mack Shotts, M.D., Appellees. No. 04-1333. Supreme Court of Arkansas. December 1, 2005. The Brad Hend
In re B.L.W.public domain
DISSENTING OPINION BY KLEIN, J.: ¶ 1 I agree with the analysis of the law of the majority. If the record and the findings of fact of the trial judge supported the conclusions made by the trial judge, I would agree with the majority. However, the trial judge misstates the record, that misstatement is adopted by the majority, and therefore I must dissent. ¶ 2 Typical of the critical misstatem
Ark Valley Credit Union v. Morris (In re Gracy)public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. THOMAS MARTEN, Judge This is the second appeal before the court involving Chapter 7 Trustee J. Michael Morris’s right to avoid Ark Valley Credit Union’s (AVCU) lien on a manufactured home that served as the debtor’s homestead. In the first appeal, the Trustee challenged the bankruptcy court’s determination that AVCU’s lien did not attach to the manufactured home because the mortgag
Johnson B. Hontanosas v. Moonyeen Hontanosaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-08-00274-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG JUSTIN HINOJOSA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from
In Re Ashton B.public domain
11/07/2017 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 20, 2017 Session IN RE ASHTON B. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-13-1503-3 Walter L. Evans, Judge ___________________________________
BARNES, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Zelma Johnson, appearing pro se, appeals the decision of the Circuit Court of Washington County, which affirmed the decision of the Board of Review (Board) of the Mississippi Department of Employment Security (MDES) denying her unemployment benefits. Finding there was not substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision, we reverse and remand to the MDES for a computation of
AMES GROWE, III * NO. 2020-CA-0143 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL RAYMOND JOHNSON AND * JOHNSON REALTY & FOURTH CIRCUIT INVESTMENT CO. * STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM FIRST CITY COUR
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ════════════ No. 09-0941 ════════════ Service Corporation International and SCI Texas Funeral Servi
Service Corp. International v. Guerrapublic domain
348 S.W.3d 221 (2011) SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL and SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc., d/b/a Mont Meta Memorial Park, Petitioners, v. Juanita G. GUERRA, Julie Ann Ramirez, Gracie Little and Mary Esther Martinez, Respondents. No. 09-0941. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued December 19, 2010. Decided June 17, 2011. *22
Commonwealth v. Johnsonpublic domain
556 Pa. 216 (1999) 727 A.2d 1089 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Roderick Andre JOHNSON, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued November 17, 1998. Decided March 26, 1999. Reargument Denied June 28, 1999. *217 *218
Commonwealth v. Johnsonpublic domain
542 Pa. 384 (1995) 668 A.2d 97 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. William JOHNSON, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 27, 1995. Decided November 22, 1995. *385 *386 *387 *388<
NATIONAL PRODUCTS, INC. v. Gamber-Johnson LLCpublic domain
734 F.Supp.2d 1160 (2010) NATIONAL PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. GAMBER-JOHNSON LLC, Defendant. Case No. C08-0049JLR. United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle. August 13, 2010. *1162 David K. Tellekson, Robert L. Jacobson, Ewa M. Davison, Fenwick & West, Mark P. Walters, Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP, Seatt
Commonwealth v. O'Kickipublic domain
408 Pa. Superior Ct. 518 (1991) 597 A.2d 152 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Joseph F. O'KICKI, Appellant. (Two Cases) Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Decided August 20, 1991. Argued April 23, 1991. Reargument Denied October 15, 1991. *523 James B. Yelovich, Somerset, for appell
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00238-CV PREMIEANT INCORPORATED d/b/a Premieant, Appellant v. Constance SNOWDEN, as next Friend and Legal Guardian of
Dowthitt v. Johnsonpublic domain
180 F.Supp.2d 832 (2000) Dennis Thurl DOWTHITT, Petitioner, v. Gary L. JOHNSON, Director, Respondent. No. H-98-3282. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. January 27, 2000. *833 *834 *835 *836
Dowthitt v. Johnsonpublic domain
Revised November 21, 2000 1 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 No. 00-20159 5 ____________________ 6 DENNIS THURL DOWTHITT 7 Petitioner - Appellant 8 v. 9 GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, 10 TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF
RANDALL, Circuit Judge: This appeal involves an action to rescind a loan agreement, for material nondisclo-sures, under the Truth-In-Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. (TILA), and for violations of the Mississippi Small Loan Regulatory Law, Miss.Code Ann. §§ 75-67-101, et seq. Petitioners
Rachlin v. Edmisonpublic domain
813 A.2d 862 (2002) Susan RACHLIN, Appellant v. David R. EDMISON, M.D., Frcs, Focus Eye Centre, 20/20 Laser Centers [Appellee], Richard B. Prince, M.D., F.A.C.S., Tri-County Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 5, 2002. Filed December 13, 2002. *864 Bernard W. Smalley, Philadelphia,
Davis Nursing Association v. Nealpublic domain
JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice A Jefferson County Circuit Court jury found that appellant Davis Life Care Center (DLCC), a long-term care facility, was *459not entitled to charitable immunity. DLCC appeals the judgment entered on the jury's verdict and the denial of its motion for new trial. For reversal, DLCC contends that (1) the circuit court