Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
6 opinions for “Gould v. Summey”
Hines v. Town of Vonorepublic domain
*637 MEMORANDUM OPINION THOMAS A. VARLAN, Chief Judge. This civil case is before the Court on two motions: a Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of Mike Myers [Doc. 58] filed by former Police Chief Mike Myers (“Myers”); and a separate Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 62] filed by the Town of Vonore (“Vonore”), Vonore Mayor Larry Summey (
Morgan v. Turn-Pro Maint. Servs., LLCpublic domain
Morgan v. Turn-Pro Maint. Servs., LLC, 2020 NCBC 5. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 18 CVS 1905 JOSHUA MORGAN, both Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of ALPINE WASTE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTIONS TURN-PRO MAINTENANCE
Dysart v. Cummingspublic domain
640 S.E.2d 832 (2007) Christian Emerson DYSART and Mildred Maxwell Dysart, Plaintiffs, v. William Kent CUMMINGS and Kimberly N. Cummings, Defendants. No. COA06-645. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. February 20, 2007. Boyce & Isley, PLLC, by Philip R. Isley, Raleigh, for plaintiffs-appellees. Bass, Bryant & Fanney, P.L.L.C., by John Walter Bryant an
In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Old Battleground v. Ccsea)public domain
In re Se. Eye Ctr. (Old Battleground v. CCSEA), 2019 NCBC 28. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION WAKE COUNTY 15 CVS 1648 IN RE SOUTHEASTERN EYE ORDER AND OPINION ON MOTIONS CENTER-PENDING MATTERS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (OLD BATTLEGROUND V. CCSEA) 1. THIS MATTER is befor
State v. . Jonespublic domain
In the view we take of this case, we deem it needless to inquire whether there is any error in the principles of law laid down by his Honor in his numerous instructions to the jury. The question is: has he given those instructions in the manner the law has made it his duty to do. The law prescribes and defines this duty. It declares that a judge in delivering his charge to the jury shall state in a plain and correct manner the evidence given in the case, and declare and explain the law arisin
State v. Wattspublic domain
Mr. Justice Eaxrohild delivered the opinion of the Court. At the January term, 1852, of the Probate Court of Dallas county, Hillory M. Bouldin, sheriff of the county, was ordered by the court to take possession of the goods and effects of Sanford Higginbotham, dec’d, and as public administrator to administer the estate with the will annexed. In accordance there