Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 19-3087 No. 19-3197 No. 19-3200 ___________________________ Jonathan Gould, on behalf of St. Louis - Kansas City Carpenters Regional Council lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant/Cross Appellee

USCA4 Appeal: 24-4192 Doc: 41 Filed: 07/29/2025 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-4192 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JAMES GOULD, Defendant - App

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0064p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, │ Plaintiff-Appellee,

Per Curiam. The workers’ compensation claim of claimant-appellant William J. Bond was initially allowed for “lumbar sprain; contusion left shoulder.” Claimant later moved appellee, Industrial Commission of Ohio, to additionally allow his claim for “Grade I — II spondylolisthesis at L5 and SI by way of direct cause or aggravation of pre-existing condition.” He also moved for temporary total disability compensation.

F. Dennis Saylor IV, United States District Judge This is a federal constitutional challenge to the firearm licensing policies of the Town of Brookline and the City of Boston. Plaintiffs Michael Gould, Christopher Hart, Danny Weng, Sarah Zesch, John Stanton, and Commonwealth Second Amendment, Inc. have brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1

USCA4 Appeal: 24-4192 Doc: 52 Filed: 01/02/2026 Pg: 1 of 24 ON REHEARING PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-4192 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JA

JUSTICE RIZZI delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Bond Drug Company of Hlinois (Bond), filed a declaratory judgment action against defendant, Amoco Oil Company (Amoco), seeking a judgment that the contract between the parties is valid, specific performance of the contract and other relief. Amoco filed a counterclaim seeking rescission of the contract and a judgment

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-24-00011-CV CAROLINE POWELL, Appellant v. JAMIE LEE GOULD AND HOLLY LYNN EADS, Appellees From the County Court at Law No. 1 Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. C20160225

LOHIER, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from a September 2010 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Daniels, J.) granting the summary judgment motion of Defendant-Appellee Grant Thornton LLP (“GT”) and dismissing the Plaintiffs’ claims *151arising from GT’s audit of the financial statements of its clie

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER VALERIE CAPRONI, United States District Judge: Plaintiff James R. Gould (“Gould”), a Bank of America Corporation (“BofA” or the “Bank”) shareholder since 1993, has filed this shareholder derivative complaint (“the Complaint”) against BofA’s Board of Directors (the “Board” or “Individual Defendants”)1 on behalf of Nominal Defen

OPINION BY PANELLA, J. ¶ 1 Appellant, Dale Gould, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on January 24, 2006, by the Honorable Conrad B. Capuzzi, P.J., Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County. After careful review, we affirm. ¶ 2 On September 8, 2004, Gould’s grandson, Michael Gibbs, a confidential informant, accompanied undercover police officer Daniel Strabinsky to Gould’s apartment

Opinion EVELEIGH, J. In Summerville v. Warden, 229 Conn. 397, 421, 641 A.2d 1356 (1994), this court held that a *546petitioner may seek a new trial pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus on the basis of a substantial claim of actual innocence unaccompanied by an antecedent showing of a constitutional violation that affected t

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th of January 2017 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th of March 2017." Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this or

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT JESSICA LYNNE JOHNSON, ) N/K/A JESSICA L. GOULD, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) WD85534 ) ISAIAH BEN JOHNSON, ) Opinion filed: May 23, 2023 ) Resp

Plaintiff church appeals from an adverse judgment in its declaratory judgment action against Nationwide Bond, Inc. (Nationwide), Insurance Company of North America (INA), and R. Frank Ussery, Director, Alabama Securities Commission, individually.1 The action sought recovery under Code of 1975, §8-6-3 (c), on the theory that that code section afforded a remedy to the public in general against a surety

David Newbern, Justice. Shirley Joan Gould, the appellant, and Larry Devon Gould, the appellee, were formerly husband and wife. They were divorced on November 7,1983, and custody of their four minor children was placed with Shirley Gould. In 1988, petitions for change of custody, collection of past due child support, and contempt were filed by both parties. Hearings were held over an 18-month period, and

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D REVISED APRIL 12, 2004 March 24, 2004 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUI

Fabricant, Judith, J. This action arises from a dispute over a commercial lease. The plaintiff tenant, MeadWestvaco Corporation, terminated the lease, contending that it had the right to do so because of the landlord’s failure to maintain the roof.2 It seeks damages resulting from roof defects, as well as damages based on certain allegedly improper charges. MeadWestvaco has also joined its sub-tenant,

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered January 16, 1996, convicting him of sodomy in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him to five years probation. Ordered that the matter is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, to hear and report on whether the condition of the sentence of probation which precludes the defendant from reuniting with his fam

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge, dissenting, joined by CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge: Because the majority opinion essentially creates another exception to the constitutional requirement that nonconsensual warrantless searches are unreasonable and this newly created exception is overly broad and unnecessary, I respectfully dissent. This case presents the difficult issues of: (1) whether the protective