Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Gorilla Mind, LLC v. Gorilla Drinks Limited”
Innovation Ventures, LLC v. NVE, Inc.public domain
ORDER RESOLVING MOTIONS IN LIMINE TERRENCE G. BERG, District Judge. This is a trademark infringement case, brought by Plaintiff Innovations Ventures, LLC d/b/a Living Essentials (“Plaintiff’) against Defendant NVE, Inc. (“Defendant”). Plaintiff makes and distributes a 2-ounce energy shot called “5-Hour ENERGY,” and asserts that Defendant’s competing energy shot — called “Stacker 2® 6-Hour POWER” —
USCA11 Case: 21-13340 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 1 of 70 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals Hor the Eleventh Circuit No. 21-13340 BIDI VAPOR LLC, Petitioner, versus U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Respondents. USCA11 Case: 21-13340 Date Filed: 08/23/2022 Page: 2 of 70 2 Opinion of the Court 21-13340 Petitions for Review of a Decision of the Food and Dr
ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 13–0642 Filed July 11, 2014 SZ ENTERPRISES, LLC d/b/a EAGLE POINT SOLAR, Appellee, vs. IOWA UTILITIES BOARD, A DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, STATE OF IOWA, Appellant, INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY, IOWA ASSOCIATION OF ELECTRIC COOPERATIVES, and MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY, Intervenors-Appellants, OFFICE OF CONSUMER ADVOCATE, ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLIC
People v. Midellpublic domain
Filed 8/28/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A168758 v. ROBERT ALLEN MIDELL, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 20NF012926A) Defendant and Appellant.
O'Donnell v. Knottpublic domain
Goldberg, J. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, Kathleen O'Donnell, a private citizen, alleges that Defendants Kathryn Knott and Karl Knott used Karl Knott's position as Chief of Police to enlist certain individuals within the Bucks County District Attorney's Office (Defendants David Heckler, Martin McDonough, and Mark Zielinksi) to assist in silencing Plaintiff's protected speech on social media
Palowsky v. Campbellpublic domain
MCCLENDON, J. The plaintiff appeals a trial court's judgment striking forty-six paragraphs and three subparagraphs from his eighty-eight paragraph petition for damages. He also appeals the two trial court's judgments *949that granted the defendants' peremptory exceptions raising the objection of no cause of action, based on absolute immunity.
M. v. Secretary of Health and Human Servicespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 08-284V (To be Published) ***************************** * T.M. and R.R.M, * parents and natural guardians of A.P.M., a minor, * Special Master Corcoran
United States v. Dicristinapublic domain
MEMORANDUM, ORDER, & JUDGMENT JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. Table of Contents I. Introduction..............................................................168 II. Facts........................ 170 A. Procedural History....................................................170 B. Evidence on Poker..................
389 F.3d 973 O CENTRO ESPIRITA BENEFICIENTE UNIAO DO VEGETAL, also known as Uniao do Vegetal (USA), Inc., a New Mexico corporation on its own behalf and on behalf of all its members in the United States; Jeffrey Bronfman, individually and as President of UDV-USA; Daniel Tucker, individually and as Vice-President of UDV-USA; Christina Barreto, individually and as Secretary of UDV-USA; Fernando Barreto, individually and as Treasurer of UDV-USA; Chris
United States v. C.R.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I.Introduction...............................................................347 II.Facts.....................................................................349 A. Defendant’s Childhood..................................................349