Cases

ORDER J. RANDAL HALL, District Judge. Presently pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. (Doc. nos. 208, 211, 213.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (doe. nos. 211, 213) are GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (doc. no. 208) is correspondingly DENIED. I. BACKGROUND

Carley, Justice. In 1990, Andrew Jackson Eckles began operating a sole proprietorship under the unregistered trade name “Atlanta Technology *802Group” (“ATG”). In the years that followed, Eckles devoted all of his time and resources to the development of his business, which has continuously used the trade name “ATG.” In May 1994, Eckles received several telephone call

MEMORANDUM OPINION GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In this lawsuit,- plaintiff Stephen B. Pence has brought claims against defendant GEE Group, Inc. (“GEE”), for which Pence formerly .served as chairman, seeking indemnification for attorney’s fees and other expenses. GEE has moved-to dismiss under the - doctrine of forum non conve-niens, or, in the alternative, to transfer the case to t

MEMORANDUM OPINION Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION This case comes before this Court from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas after withdrawal of the reference. In 2011, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed the debtor’s (CryptoMetrics) Second Amended Chapter 11 Plan, after which a creditors’ trust and shareholders’ trust were est

619 F.Supp.2d 1260 (2009) Raymond H. PIERSON, III, Plaintiff, and Joanne R. Werntz, Intervenor-Plaintiff, v. ORLANDO REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS, INC.; Erik Lieberman, as personal representative of the Estate of Phillip G. Spiegel; Roger Murbach; Steven Appleblatt; Frank Bone; William Bott; Thomas Csencsitz; J. Dean Cole; John Hillenmeyer; J. David Moser; N. Donald Diebel; Rory Evans; Manuel J. Galceran; Hedrick J. Rivero; C. Gordon Wolfram;

660 S.E.2d 750 (2008) GATEWAY ATLANTA APARTMENTS, INC. v. HARRIS, et al. Cline, et al. v. Harris, et al. Douglass Frontier, LLC, et al. v. Harris, et al. Worthing Southeast, Inc. v. Harris, et al. Nos. A07A2070 — A07A2073. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 10, 2008. Reconsideration Denied April 7, 2008.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 31, 2022 Decided August 23, 2022 No. 21-5073 GORDON M. PRICE, APPELLEE v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., APPELLANTS Appeal from the United States District Court

708 S.E.2d 48 (2011) GORDON DOCUMENT PRODUCTS, INC. v. SERVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al. No. A10A1883. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 16, 2011. *50 Parker, Hudson, Rainer & Dobbs, J. Marbury Rainer, Linda G. Carpenter, Atlanta, for appellant. Ford & Harrison, Rachel R. Krause, Valeria R. Cometto, John L. Monroe

OPINION AND ORDER CLARENCE COOPER, Senior District Judge. This premises liability action is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order [Doc. No. 46] and Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 57]. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order as moot.

(2007) In re SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. Civil Action No. 1:01-CV-1950-RWS. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. September 7, 2007. ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. This case is presently before the Court for consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification [151]. After considering

ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge This dispute between business competitors involving the alleged misappropriation of proprietary computer source code is pending before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for an Interlocutory Injunction [Doc. 6]. The Court held a hearing on January 19, 2016, and heard arguments from both parties as well as the testimony of two witnesses on behalf of Plainti

Opinion LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases are investors who opted out of the class and settlement in In re American International Group, Inc. 2008 Securities Litigation, No. 08-CV-4772 (the “Class Action”) and, at various times, filed individual actions for damages against the Defendants1

ORDER DENYING IOVATE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, ORDERING MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AS TO CLAIMS AGAINST RETAILER DEFENDANTS, AND DENYING RETAILER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge. The Iovate Defendants (Iovate Health Sciences, Inc., Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., and Kerr Investment Holding Corp.) have filed a motion to dismiss Count I, in part, and Counts VII and IX, in

AMENDED ORDER1 Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge This case, filed in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia on November 10, 2015, and removed to this Court on November 25, 2015, by Defendants SignaPay, Ltd., SignaPay, LLC, Andres Ordóñez, and Tom Bohan,2 is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Response to this Court’s December 1, 2015 Or

749 F.Supp.2d 1352 (2010) EXCEPTIONAL MARKETING GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, v. Jeff JONES, et al., Defendants. Civil Action File No. 1:10-CV-1312-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. October 22, 2010. *1356 Fredric Chaiken, Chaiken Klofein, LLC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff. Devin Howard Gordon, Hen

168 F.Supp.2d 1322 (2001) Raymond Maurice SONNIER III, Plaintiff, v. COMPUTER PROGRAMS & SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. No. 00CV505. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama. Southern Division. May 21, 2001. Order Denying Motion to Amend, June 15, 2001. *1323 Sarah H. Stewart, The Stewart Firm, P.C., Mobile, AL,

465 B.R. 683 (2012) In re Derrick Dewayne GORDON, Debtor. Proudfoot Consulting Company (n/k/a Alexander Proudfoot Company), Movant, v. Derrick Dewayne Gordon, Respondent. No. 11-62509-WLH. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. January 24, 2012. *686 Sage M. Sigler, William Stewart Sugden, Alston &

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 9(b), defendants Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. and Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., (“Manufacturer Defendants” or “Iovate”) and GNC Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreens Company, CV

HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-Appellant George David Gordon is a former securities attorney convicted of multiple criminal charges relating to his alleged participation in a- “pump-and-dump” scheme where he, along with others, violated the federal securities laws by artificially inflating the value of various stocks, and then turning around and selling them for a substantial prof

ORDER THOMAS W. THRASH, JR., District Judge. This is an employment discrimination action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 71] of the Magistrate Judge recommending that the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 53] be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. For the reasons set forth in the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, there is a genui