Cases

FeatheRston, Judge: Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal estate tax in the amount of $8,070.42. The sole issue presented for decision is whether at the time of his death, decedent possessed 'any of - the incidents of ownership in a group term life insurance policy within the meaning of section 2042.1 FINDINGS OE PACT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2017 Term FILED February 9, 2017 No. 16-0670 released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

DAVIS, Justice: The petitioner herein, the Judicial Investigation Commission (“JIC”), requests this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against one of the respondents herein, the Putnam County Board of Ballot Commissioners (“Board”), to remove the other respondent herein, Troy Sexton (“Mr. Sexton”), a candidate for the office of magistrate in Putnam County, as a magisterial candida

382 Mass. 629 (1981) 417 N.E.2d 387 MARY MOE & others[1] vs. SECRETARY OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE & others.[2] Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. September 8, 1980. February 18, 1981. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., QUIRICO, BRAUCHER, KAPLAN, WILKINS, LIACOS, & ABRAMS, JJ. Nancy Gertner<

245 F.Supp.2d 681 (2003) Mildred TURNER Plaintiff, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. CIV.A. 02-6705. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. February 20, 2003. *682 Thomas D. Sutton, Esquire, Leventhal & Sutton, Langhorne, for Plaintiffs. Nicholas Cerulli, Esquire, Social

Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL September 26, 2023 90 SEPTEMBER, 2023 348 Conn. 90 Salce v. Cardello JOHN SALCE v. JOAN CARDELLO (SC 20701) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Ecker and Alexander, Js. Syllabus The plaintiff, who, alon

MEMORANDUM WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 78, filed by Defendant Officer William Scott Kern and a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Officer Efren Edwards and Major Eric Russell. ECF No. 86. The motio'ns are ripe. Upon a review of the pleadings and the applicable case law, the Court determines that no hearing is

Memorandum Opinion David Stewart Cercone, United States District Judge I. ' Introduction Plaintiff, Julia Hair (“Hair” or “Plaintiff’) filed an Amended Complaint alleging: (1) Discrimination, Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation under the Rehabilitation Act ' against Defendant, Fayette County (the “County”); (2) Discr

STARCHER, Justice. This is a case where the Attorney General of the State of West Virginia claims that executive branch agencies and officials are violating our State’s Constitution by using lawyers who are not employed or approved by the Attorney General. Through his petition, the Attorney General asserts that the respondents have a clear legal duty to cease authorizing the “unlawful” employment of lawyers by executive bra

Opinion NORCOTT, J. This appeal1 arises out of an action brought by the plaintiff employees2 against the named defendant, Lawrence Brunoli, Inc., and certain of its *214officers,3 wherein the plaintiffs alleged that, with respect to three separate public wor

*831OPINION OF THE COURT GARTH, Circuit Judge. This appeal calls upon us once again to deal with the difficult and controversial subject of abortion.1 We are asked to decide whether two Pennsylvania statutes2 contravene the requirements of Title XIX of the Social Security Act3

623 F.2d 829 Jane ROE, Mary Moe, and Annyce Hawkins, Individually and onbehalf of all others similarly situated; John Franklin,M.D., and Louis Gerstley, III, M.D., Individually and onbehalf of all others similarly situated; Planned Parenthoodof Southeastern Pennsylvania, Elizabeth Blackwell HealthCenter for Women, Women's Health Service, and PhiladelphiaWelfare Rights Organization, Pennsylvania Not-for-ProfitCorporations

443 U.S. 622 (1979) BELLOTTI, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. v. BAIRD ET AL. No. 78-329. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 27, 1979. Decided July 2, 1979.[*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS *624 Garrick F. Cole, Assistant At

491 F.Supp. 630 (1980) Cora McRAE, Jane Doe, Mary Doe, Susan Roe, Ann Moe, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Planned Parenthood of New York City, Inc.; and Irwin B. Teran, M. D., Jane Hodgson, M. D., David B. Bingham, M. D., Hugh Savage, M. D., Edgar W. Jackson, Lewis H. Koplik, M. D., Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Women's Division of the Board of Global Ministries of the United Methodist Church,

* Reported and annotated 67 A.L.R. 718, 737. This is an action in mandate to compel the appellant, as city clerk of Evansville, to amend or change a certificate which he made in compliance with Acts 1921, ch. 218, § 3, § 10190 Burns 1926, after a petition had been filed with him on April 11, 1927, asking that the question of adopting the city-manager plan of government be submitted to the voters of that city.