Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “Google Inc. v. Spivak”
707 F.Supp.2d 737 (2010) SAINT-GOBAIN AUTOVER USA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. XINYI GLASS NORTH AMERICA, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:06CV2781. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 31, 2010. As Corrected April 13, 2010. *742 Kip T. Bollin, Matthew D. Ridings, Thompson Hine, C
Car-Freshner Corp. v. Getty Images, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, District Judge. Currently before the Court, in this trademark and unfair competition action filed by Car-Freshner Corporation (“CFC”) and Julius Samann Ltd. (“JSL”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) against Getty Images, Inc. and Getty Images (U.S.) Inc. (“Defendants”), are the following two motions: (1) Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended
Piasa Armory, LLC v. Raoulpublic domain
2025 IL 130539 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 130539) PIASA ARMORY, LLC, Appellee, v. KWAME RAOUL, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Illinois, Appellant. Opinion filed April
Globalaw Ltd. v. Carmon & Carmon Law Officepublic domain
452 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) GLOBALAW LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. CARMON & CARMON LAW OFFICE and Globalaw, Inc., Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. Globalaw Limited, Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP, Jackson Walker L.L.P., and Garvey Schubert Barer, Counterclaim Defendants. No. CIV A 03-950 CKK. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 11