Cases

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Factual Background . 383 Law . 397 Certifying Actuaries . 406 Experts . 407 Interest Rate Background. 409 Petitioners’ Expert . 413 Long-Term Rates of Return . 413 <

197 F.Supp.2d 1278 (2002) Rick D. BURNS, Plaintiff, v. The BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF JACKSON in the State of KANSAS, Edward D. Bruns, John T. Grau and Ellen Schirmer, Defendants. No. 00-4119-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 8, 2002. *1279 *1280

314 F.Supp.2d 101 (2004) Gary Mark SKALABAN Plaintiff, v. The DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Kristine Ragalia, Jose Aparicio, Jane Goodell, and Liza Frank Casualty Company, Defendant. No. CIV.3:02CV1450 (AVC). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. February 2, 2004. *102 *103 Gary

912 F.Supp. 1416 (1995) T.Y., a minor, by her next friend, Lynette PETTY, B.A., a minor, by his next friend, P.C., D.S., a minor by his next friends, A.M. and Lynette Petty, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF SHAWNEE; Donald J. Cooper, Chairman, Victor W. Miller, Vice-Chairman, Winifred Kingman, member of the Shawnee County Commission, in their official capaciti

The Chancellor. Two questions have been made and discussed in this case: (1) Whether William, the only lawful issue of John Sagoharase, the Oneida Indian, was competent to take, and hold as heir, the lands in question, which had been granted to his father by the patent of the 13th of July, 1793 ? (3) Whether Peter Smith acquired a lawful

276 Kan. 232 (2003) 75 P.3d 226 BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. SANDY PRAEGER in her official capacity as Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Kansas, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, and ANTHEM INSURANCE COMPANIES, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v. SANDY PRAEGER in her official capacity as Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Kansas, Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

253 Kan. 175 (1993) 853 P.2d 1157 THE WOMAN'S CLUB OF TOPEKA, KANSAS, Appellant, v. SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS, THE BOARD OF SHAWNEE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, and THE SHAWNEE COUNTY APPRAISER, Appellees. No. 68,701 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed May 28, 1993. Gerald L. Goodell, of Goodell, Stratton, Edmonds & Palmer, of Topeka, arg

*167OPINION. McMahon: The petitioner having abandoned his assignment of error in Docket No. 44321 regarding the refusal of the respondent to allow as deductions certain expenses incurred in the drilling of oil wells and other development, there remains for determination only the question of whether the items of income set forth in our findings of fact

*135OPINION. Sternhagen : The question presented affects all restricted Indians of the Osage tribe. It applies particularly to the years 1919 and 1920, and therefore its decision is not affected by the fact that citizenship has since been conferred upon the Osages. The facts are stipulated by the parties but they do not disclose the exact status of the

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge: We consider a challenge to an ordinance of the City and County of San Francisco (the city) giving various preferences to minority-owned, women-owned and locally-owned business enterprises (MBEs, WBEs and LBEs). The district court upheld the ordinance, rejecting claims that it violates the city’s charter, federal civil rights laws and the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment.

520 F.Supp. 1278 (1981) The ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK; Robert W. Burr, Jr., Individually and as President of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York; John Logan, Individually and as Vice-President of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York; Winnifred Jacobs, Individually and as Treasurer of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York; Geralda Thompson, Individually and as Clerk of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York; Tamara Rodgers, Individually and as Record

813 F.2d 922 42 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,894, 55 USLW 2547 ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., et al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellee,andSan Francisco Black Chamber of Commerce, et al.,Intervenors-Defendants/Appellees. No. 85-2420. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit.

243 N.J. Super. 75 (1989) 578 A.2d 887 TRUSTEES OF THE CLIENTS' SECURITY FUND OF THE BAR OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. CHARLES E. MILLER, DEFENDANT. Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Passaic County. August 2, 1989. *77 Daniel R. Hendi, Deputy Counsel for Clients' Security Fund appeared. Kenneth J. Bo

123 F.3d 1342 80 A.F.T.R.2d 97-6321, 97-2 USTC P 50,613,Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 15764B, 97 CJ C.A.R. 1681 Edward J. FINLEY, Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant,v.UNITED STATES of America, Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff-Appellee,Floyd Johnson, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-3108. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit.

443 U.S. 193 (1979) UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO-CLC v. WEBER ET AL. No. 78-432. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 28, 1979. Decided June 27, 1979.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *195 Michael H. Gottesman argued the cause for peti

396 F.Supp. 710 (1975) Dianne PELTIER et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF FARGO, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Defendants. Civ. No. A3-74-78. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southeastern Division. June 25, 1975. *711 *712 *713 Robert A. Feder,

225 Kan. 517 (1979) 592 P.2d 875 In the matter of the appeal of Clay L. Wirt, Robert C. Bacon, and John J. Franke, Jr., as the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Johnson, Kansas; Prather H. Brown, Jr., as the County Appraiser of said County; Edna C. Craig as the County Treasurer of said County; and Donald Curry, as County Clerk of said County, from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals of the State of Kansas, Appellee

691 F.2d 1070 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1002 ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF NEW YORK, et al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants, Cross- Appellees,v.STATE OF NEW YORK, Counties of Broome, Chenango, Cortland,Herkimer, Jefferson, Lewis, Madison, Oswego, Oneida,Onondaga, St. Lawrence and Tioga, Individually and as ClassRepresentatives, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF WISCONSIN and Oneida

PER CURIAM: Rosemary L. Jimenez appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jimenez v. Astrue, No. 1:06-ev-01446-JFM, 2006 WL 3781165 (D.Md. Dec. 20, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t

622 F.2d 972 BLUE CROSS ASSOCIATION, Appellee,andAmerican Hospital Association, Intervenor-Appellee,v.Patricia R. HARRIS, Secretary of Health, Education &Welfare, Leonard Schaeffer, Administrator, HealthCare Financing Administration, Appellants.MISSOURI HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a pro forma decreecorporation, Kansas City Area Hospital Association, acorporation, Hospital Association of Metropolitan St. Louis,a