Cases

Ct. App. Tex., 8th Dist. Certiorari denied.

OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice. Good Times Stores, Inc. brings this accelerated interlocutory appeal from an order vacating the arbitrator’s decision. Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.016 (West Supp. 2010). We reverse the trial court’s order vacating the arbitration award and render judgment confirming the arbitrator’s decision.

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS GOOD TIMES STORES, INC., Appellant, v. MARTHA MACIAS, Appellee. § §

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, concurring: I concur in the good opinion of my colleague writing for the court, recognizing that Bouchat, in seeking to avail himself of his victory in Bouchat I, has conceded that the downstream defendants he has named in the related cases before us are in privity with the defendants in Bouchat I. Therefore, the downstream defendants benefit from the preclusive effe

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2408 ___________________________ Cloetta Brady Plaintiff - Appellant v. Walmart Stores East I, LP; Walmart Stores East, LP Defendants

MAXINE M. CHESNEY, United States District Judge Before the Court is plaintiff Mark Beasley's ("Beasley") "Motion to Remand," filed December 21, 2018, whereby Beasley seeks an order remanding the instant action to the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. On January 16, 2019, defendants Lucky Stores, Inc. ("Lucky"), Nestlé USA, Inc. ("Nestlé"), Save Mart Super Markets ("Save Mart"), The Kroger Company ("Kroger"), an

FLOYD, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from a protracted trademark dispute between appellant Variety Stores, Inc. ("Variety"), and cross-appellant and appellee Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Walmart"). The district court granted partial summary judgment in Variety's favor, finding Walmart liable for trademark infringement. Following a subsequent bench trial, the district court ordered Walm

2024 IL App (1st) 230582 No. 1-23-0582 July 9, 2024 SIXTH DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ROBERTA RUDA,

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Giant Food Stores, LLC, : Appellant : : v. : : No. 1310 C.D. 2016 Penn Township : Argued: May 3, 2017 BEFORE: HONORABLE MARY HANNAH LEAVITT, President Judge

2024 IL App (1st) 230582 No. 1-23-0582 ______, 2024 SIXTH DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT ROBERTA RUDA,

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 599 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-22-321 Opinion Delivered December 13, 2023 SHANE PERRY APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY APPELLANT CIRCUIT COURT

2023 IL App (1st) 220900 FIFTH DIVISION August 18, 2023 No. 1-22-0900 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TERESA ARMSTRONG, No. 21-15397 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:17-cv- 06540-LHK v. MICHAELS STORES, INC.; DOES, OPINION 1-100, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0121p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ TRESSA SHERROD; JOHN CRAWFORD, JR.; JHC, IV AND │ JC, minors, JOHN C

NOTICE: SLIP OPINION (not the court’s final written decision) The opinion that begins on the next page is a slip opinion. Slip opinions are the written opinions that are originally filed by the court. A slip opinion is not necessarily the court’s final written decision. Slip opinions can be changed by subsequent court orders. For example, a court may issue an order making substantive changes to a slip opinion or publishing for precedential pur

OPINION Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice Appellant, FP Stores, Inc., is the former landlord of appellee, Tramontina US, Inc. Tramontina sued FP Stores for breach of contract and violation of Texas Property Code section 93.011, alleging that FP Stores retained its security deposit in bad faith. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Tramontina, and FP Stores appealed. We hold that FP Stores presented

Case: 20-1304 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 01/07/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ QUIKTRIP WEST, INC., Appellant v. WEIGEL STORES, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2020-1304 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Pat

SAUNDERS, Judge. *1252This is a case involving a slip and fall at a convenience store. The merchant was granted a summary judgment under a finding of the trial court that the patron could not prove the elements under La.R.S. 9:2800.6 at trial. This appeal follows. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

SAUNDERS, Judge. *1252This is a case involving a slip and fall at a convenience store. The merchant was granted a summary judgment under a finding of the trial court that the patron could not prove the elements under La.R.S. 9:2800.6 at trial. This appeal follows. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY: