Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gonzalez v. Zhu”
Gonzalez v. City of the New Yorkpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Renwick, J. This action arises from the shooting death of Shirley Fontanez by her boyfriend, Police Officer Frederick Maselli, at his home, on July 23, 2007. After the shooting, Maselli killed himself. Fontanez was 16 years old when she began her relationship with Maselli, who was then 38 years old. Fontanez is survived by her infant
Hui Zhu Lu v. the State of Texaspublic domain
Affirm and Opinion Filed May 31, 2023 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00235-CR HUI ZHU LU, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 Collin County, Texas
Garcia-Gonzalez v. Garlandpublic domain
Case: 22-60501 Document: 00516848039 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/07/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________
Li Zhu He v. Mukaseypublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Li Zhu He, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying asylum and withholding of removal We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the factual findings underlying the denial of asylum and withholding, Ramos-Vasquez v. INS,
In re Gonzalezpublic domain
AMENDED OPINION ERIC L. FRANK, CHIEF U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This chapter 13 case presents the following issue: Following a tax sale conducted pursuant to 53 P.S. § 7283, may a debtor who files a chapter 13 bankruptcy case before the expiration of the redemption period provided by 53 P.S. § 7293(a), treat and provide for the amount
In re Gonzalezpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ERIC L. FRANK, CHIEF U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE I. Presently before the court is the confirmation of the Sixth Amended Chapter 13 Plan (“the Plan”) filed by Catherine Gon*513zalez (“the Debtor”). The Debtor is the former record owner of the residential real property located at 7231 Leonard Street, Philadelphia, PA (“the Pr
Ansberto Gonzalez v. Kenneth Cuccinelli, IIpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1435 ANSBERTO FERNANDEZ GONZALEZ; VILMA OLIVARES SALGUERO; CAMELIA GUERRERO ANTONIO; JACINTO PEREZ ACOSTA, Plaintiffs – Appellants and MARIA ELENA MALDONADO JUAREZ, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Senior Official Perfor
NUMBER 13-23-00319-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG YOLANDA GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. AMERICAN NATIONAL LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 9
Li Fang Zhu v. Attorney General of the United Statespublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM: Petitioner Li Fang Zhu, a native and citizen of the Fujian Province, People’s Republic of China, entered the United States without possessing a valid visa, identity, or entry document in 2005, and was placed in removal proceedings for that reason. Subsequently, she applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Zhu claims that her villag
Ben Gui Zhu v. Great River Holding, LLCpublic domain
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered April 14, 2004, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the matter remanded for further proceedings. The ladder used by plaintiff was not an adequate safety device for the task he was performing, which entailed work at
Li Fang Zhu v. Attorney General of the United Statespublic domain
OPINION PER CURIAM: Petitioner Li Fang Zhu, a native and citizen of the Fujian Province, People’s Republic of China, entered the United States without possessing a valid visa, identity, or entry document in 2005, and was placed in removal proceedings for that reason. Subsequently, she applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Zhu claims that her villag
Muhlstock v. Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdalepublic domain
Muhlstock v Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale (2024 NY Slip Op 06128) Muhlstock v Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale 2024 NY Slip Op 06128 Decided on December 05, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State
Callaghan v. County of Nassaupublic domain
Callaghan v County of Nassau (2025 NY Slip Op 01340) Callaghan v County of Nassau 2025 NY Slip Op 01340 Decided on March 12, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L
Membreno-Rodriguez v. Garlandpublic domain
Case: 23-60022 Document: 56-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/04/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED March 4, 2024 No. 23-60022
Cardona-Morales v. Holderpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Karla Vanesa Cardona-Morales petitions this court for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying a motion for reconsideration, which followed a decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Although Car-dona-Morales raises several challenges to the determinations made by the IJ and the BIA with respect to the IJ’s
Munoz v. Agenus, Inc.public domain
Munoz v Agenus, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 04636) Munoz v Agenus, Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 04636 Decided on July 20, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. </
Ustelimova v. Madarpublic domain
Ustelimova v Madar (2018 NY Slip Op 02164) Ustelimova v Madar 2018 NY Slip Op 02164 Decided on March 28, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary
Jesus Mercado v. Loretta Lynchpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Petitioner Jesus Cardoso Mercado was ordered removed from the United States pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii) after the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) found that his convictions for indecent exposure and making terroristic threats under Texas law are crimes involving moral turpitude (“CIMT”). Because we hold that the BIA applied the incorrect standard in
Palacios v. Town of N. Hempsteadpublic domain
Palacios v Town of N. Hempstead (2018 NY Slip Op 06927) Palacios v Town of N. Hempstead 2018 NY Slip Op 06927 Decided on October 17, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting B
Aguilar-Quintanilla v. McHenrypublic domain
Case: 24-60142 Document: 99-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/24/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED January 24, 2025 No. 24-60142