Cases

566 F.3d 347 (2009) Marguerite P. KELLEY, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY. No. 08-1652. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued January 8, 2009. Opinion Filed: May 15, 2009. Scott A. Dye, (Argued), Cohen, Fluhr & Gonzalez, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant. Eric P. Kressman, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Patrici

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALLEN L. TREICHLER, No. 12-35944 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:11-cv-01333-SI COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Susana B. Navarro, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No. 15-1712 (CKK) : Commissioner of Social Security,

PER CURIAM: Claimant Betty Mijenes appeals the district court’s order affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her application for supplemental security income. On appeal, Mijenes argues that the ALJ’s residual functional capacity assessment is not supported by substantial evidence. She also challenges the ALJ’s determination that she could perform her past relevant work, as well as the weight the ALJ assig

MARCUS, Circuit Judge: The disability programs administered under the Social Security Act "are of a size and extent difficult to comprehend." Richardson v. Perales , 402 U.S. 389 , 399,

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Francisco Garcia brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 1383(c) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his claim for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. On March 1, 2016, the Commissioner m

286 F.Supp.2d 121 (2003) Elizabeth GONZALEZ RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendants. Civil No. 02-1991(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 23, 2003. *122 Raymond Rivera-Esteves, Juan Hernandez Rivera & Assoc., San Juan, PR, for plaintiff. Camille L. Velez-Rive, United S

MEMORANDUM DECISION FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge. Pro se plaintiff Denise M. Hairston (“Hairston”) brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“Act”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §.405(g), seeking review of a final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying the application of her minor daughter, S.N.

250 F.Supp.2d 12 (2003) Altagracia TORRES-GONZALEZ, Plaintiff v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant No. CIV. 02-2250(SEC-JAC). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 12, 2003. Rafael Colon-Flores, Esq., Ponce, PR, for Plaintiff. Camille L. Velez Rive, A.U.S.A., U.S. Attorney's Office, Hato Rey, PR, for Defendant. OPINION A

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court is U.S. Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas’ Report and Recommendation (“the R & R”) recommending the dismissal of this action. ECF No. 11. Objections have not been filed to the R & R. I. Procedural History On December 17, 2013, plaintiff Santiago Eduardo Padilla-Gómez

OPINION AND ORDER AIDA M. DELGADO-COLÓN, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court is U.S. Magistrate Judge Justo Arenas’ Report and Recommendation (“the R & R”), recommending that plaintiff Elizabeth Ramos-Rodriguez’s (“plaintiff’) complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed and the decision of defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (“defendant”), be affirmed. ECF No. 20. The R & R was filed

MEMORANDUM *** Margarita Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) appeals the district court’s summary judgment grant affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for Supplemental Security Income Disability Benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the judgment of the district court. Substantial evide

(2008) Myrna L. GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. ASTRUE,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Civ. No. 06-76-LPS. United States District Court, D. Delaware. February 28, 2008. MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK., United States Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Myrna L. Gonzalez ("Gonzalez") appea

OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Magistrate Judge. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 11, 2013, plaintiff filed this petition for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security which denied her application for a period of disability and Social Security disability insurance benefits. (Docket No. 1). She filed a memorandum of law seek

MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Rafael Gonzalez-Cruz ("Gonzalez-Cruz") brings this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the "Commissioner") denying

OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Magistrate Judge. On August 10, 2012, plaintiff filed this petition for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security which denied her application for a period of disability and Social Security disability insurance benefits. The answer to the complaint was filed on January 15, 2013 (Docket No. 7). Plaintiff filed a memorand

OPINION AND ORDER JUSTO ARENAS, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff suffered a fall at his home on September 21, 2007 and broke his left wrist. He was operated on four days later. Because of complications, a fracture malformation, another operation was performed and a metal plate surgically inserted weeks later. Plaintiff, who is right handed, filed for social security disability benefits

MEMORANDUM * Carol Wilson (Wilson) appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Wilson’s application for disability insurance benefits under the Title II of the Social Security Act. We review a district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of benefits de novo. Schneider v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 223 F.3d 968, 973 (9th Ci

MEMORANDUM * Carol Wilson (Wilson) appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Wilson’s application for disability insurance benefits under the Title II of the Social Security Act. We review a district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of benefits de novo. Schneider v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 223 F.3d 968, 973 (9th Ci

(2008) Edith M. SOSA, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. CIV. No. 05-2241 (PG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 16, 2008. ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge. Before the Court is the Magistrate Judges's Report and Recommendation affirming the decision of the Commissioner of Social Secu