Cases

C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.

DECISION PER CURIAM: ¶ 1 Rudy Gomez appeals his convictions for three counts of aggravated sexual abuse of a ° child, a first degree felony. We affirm. T2 Gomez's appellate counsel has filed a hybrid brief that argues a single issue *553 under standa

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge. On January 13, 2016, Marco Antonio Cortes-Gomez was indicted with two codefendants on counts related to a methamphetamine conspiracy (" Cortes-Gomez I "). His trial began on November 29, 2016. The interim included two superseding indictments, dismissal of the indictment and the filing of a new one with identical charges (" Cortes-Gom

González, J. ¶39 (concurring in result only) — I agree with the majority that the trial judge properly declined to instruct the jury on informed consent because the evidence presented at trial did not support a finding of proximate cause. I write separately to stress that a health care provider may be liable for both a negligence claim and an informed consent claim arising from the same set of facts. While the majority purport

This opinion is subject to revision before publication UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES _______________ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Omar M. GOMEZ, Boatswain’s Mate Second Class United States Coast Guard, Appellant No. 16-0336 Crim. App. No. 1394 Argued October 26, 201

MEMORANDUM ** Ryan Deon Williams Gomez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for conspiracy to commit bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gomez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a moti

OPINION OF THE COURT Dillon, J. We are asked on this appeal to consider whether a patient’s consultation with a new physician severs the patient’s relationship with her initial physician for purposes of the “continuous treatment” toll of the statute of limitations. We also consider whether, under the circumstances of this case, a 24-month gap in the patient’s treatment with her initial physician requires

Panel: Graeff, Leahy, James P. Salmon (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned), JJ. Salmon, J. *229 *852 On the evening of April 23-24, 2012, five people were residing at a house

609 F.Supp.2d 1149 (2009) K. Jamel WALKER, Plaintiff, v. James GOMEZ, et al., Defendants. No. 96cv609 PCL. United States District Court, S.D. California. March 11, 2009. *1151 Jamel Walker, Calipatria, CA, pro se. Amy J. Laurendeau, Lead Attorney, O'Melveny and Myers, Newport Beach, CA, for K. Jamel Walker, Plaintiff.

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY TU M. PHAM, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the court by order of reference is defendants Jim’s Place, LLC and Costa B. Taras’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Second Motion to Compel Discovery, filed on October 16, 2014. (ECF No. 42.) Plaintiff Alfonso Lopez-Gomez (“Plaintiff”) filed his response in opposition on October 29, 2014. (ECF No. 4

16 A.3d 261 (2011) 198 Md. App. 87 Alicia GOMEZ v. JACKSON HEWITT, INC. et al. No. 1074, September Term, 2009. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. March 31, 2011. *263 Daniel Katz, Silver Spring, MD, & John Roddy, Boston, MA (Elizabeth Ryan, Roddy, Klein & Ryan, Patrick Perotti, Nicole T. Fiorell

OPINION BALES, Justice. VIA 1996 initiative measure known as Proposition 200 requires courts to place certain first- and second-time drug offenders on probation including appropriate drug treatment or education. Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 13-901.01 (2002). Mandatory probation, however, does not apply to any defendant “who has been convicted of or indicted for a violent crime,” and such persons may be imprisone

123 P.3d 1131 (2005) 211 Ariz. 494 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Fabio Evelio GOMEZ, Appellant. No. CR-03-0199-AP. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. December 6, 2005. *1133 Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General, by Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Capital Litigation Section, Jim D. Nielsen, Assistant At

805 F.Supp.2d 923 (2011) Jose GOMEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Plaintiff, v. CAMPBELL-EWALD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. CV 10-2007 DMG (CWx). United States District Court, C.D. California. April 8, 2011. *924 Evan M. Meyers, Michael J. McMorrow, Rafey S. Bala

362 S.W.3d 740 (2011) KINGWOOD PINES HOSPITAL, LLC, Horizon Health Corporation, Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. and Yolanda Bassett, Appellants, v. R. GOMEZ, Individually and a/n/f of V.G., Appellee. No. 14-11-00050-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). November 22, 2011. *743 Ryan Lee Clement, Houston, for appellants.

622 F.Supp.2d 710 (2008) Blanca GOMEZ and Joan Wagner-Barnett, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ST. VINCENT HEALTH, INC., Defendant. Case No. 1:08-cv-0153-DFH-DML. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. December 16, 2008. Ronald E. Weldy, Weldy & Associates, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiffs.

ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge. In February 1997, appellant entered a plea of guilty to possession of a concealed firearm and was placed on probation. In November of 1997, his probation was revoked based on his admitted violations and he was sentenced to a term in prison. His guidelines scoresheet included 18 points for possession of a firearm, which he contends makes his sentence illegal, based on White v. State, 714 S

243 F.Supp.2d 1029 (2002) Alonso Antonio BARAHONA-GOMEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. John ASHCROFT, Attorney General of the United States, et al. Defendants. No. C97-0895 CW. United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division. December 18, 2002. Settlement Agreement December 18, 2002. Marc Van Der Hout (Ca. Bar No. 80778), Zachary Nightingal

October 15, 2024 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 21 350 Conn. 19 OCTOBER, 2024 19 State v. Delacruz-Gomez STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. RAIKES Y. DELACRUZ-GOMEZ (SC 20828) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexan

Abrams, J. The plaintiff, Citation Insurance Company (Citation), filed a complaint in the Superior Court seeking a declaration that it has no duty to defend and indemnify its insureds, the defendants Brenda and Roger Gomez, for losses asserted by a minor who was injured while playing on an abandoned structure on the Gomezes’ land. See G. L. c. 231 A. On cross motions for summary judgment the Superior Court judge allowed the Gome