Cases

AMENDED OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this putative multistate class action, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Rheem Manufacturing Company (“Rheem” or “Rheem Manufacturing”) manufactured defective residential heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (“HVAC”) systems under the Rheem and Ruud brand names. Plaintiffs in the proposed class consist of all individuals who purchased

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge. Plaintiff-appellee Ron Warren, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Derrek Hebert, filed a petition for damages seeking to recover for the wrongful death of his son, Derek Hebert, in a recreational boating accident under general maritime law and products liability. The defendant, Te-leflex, Inc. (Teleflex), was found liable and appeals various judgments casting it for compensatory damages of $12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Case No. 24-cr-151 (JMC) v. ANTHONY EUGENE BURNS, Defendant. ORDER DENYING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER The Government asks this Court to reconsider its denial of the Government’s motion to admit other-cri

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal Action No. 95-154-8 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell GERALD SMITH, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In 1996, defendant Gerald Smith was convicted, fol

Cuéllar, J. We granted review to address two related issues: whether employers are required to permit their employees to take off-duty rest periods under Labor Code section 226.7 and Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) wage order No. 4-2001 (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11040 (Wage Order 4)), and whether employers may require their employees to remain "on call" during rest periods. What

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge Defendants Dwight Knowles and Oral George Thompson are charged in a one-count indictment with conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute at least five kilograms of cocaine on board an aircraft registered in the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 9

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 11-2420 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICARDO MITCHELL, Appellant _____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of the Virgin Islands (No. 3-10-cr-00059-001)

OPINION TERRY JENNINGS, Justice. Appellant, Lone Starr Multi-Theatres, Ltd. (“Lone Starr”), challenges the trial court’s judgment, entered after a jury trial, in favor of appellee, Max Interests, Ltd. (“Max”), on Max’s claim against Lone Starr for breach of contract. In its first issue, Lone Starr contends that the evidence is legally and factually insuf

Chief Judge Rubén Castillo Since 2006, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (the "ATF") has engaged in sting operations wherein undercover agents present individuals in this District with an opportunity to rob a fictitious drug stash house. See generally United States v. Mayfield , 771 F.3d 417

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JUAN VILLA RAMIREZ, Defendant and Appellant. S099844 Kern County Superior Court SC076259A August 25, 2022 Justice Corrigan authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye a

185 Ariz. 521 (1996) 917 P.2d 250 Laurence FLOREZ, Petitioner, v. Honorable William P. SARGEANT, III, a Judge for the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, County of Maricopa, Respondent Judge, and Ramon GOMEZ, Real Party in Interest. Clarence Russell DUNCAN and Mary Justice Duncan, individually and as husband and wife, Petitioners, v. Hon. Alan S. KAMIN, a Judge, Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and fo

28 F.Supp.2d 1170 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ASARCO INCORPORATED; Government Gulch Mining Company, Inc.; Hecla Mining Company, Inc.; Sunshine Mining Company, Inc.; Sunshine Precious Metals, Inc.; Coeur d' Alene Mines Corporation; and Callahan Mining Corporation, Defendants. And Consolidated Case. Nos. CV 96-0122-N-EJL, CV 91-342-N-EJL. United States District Court, D. Idaho.

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. The outcome of this case is controlled by the applicable scope of review. A district court’s decision setting aside a jury verdict is entitled to no deference. United States v. Santistevan, 39 F.3d 250, 254 (10th Cir.1994). This court reviews a district court’s grant of a motion for acquittal de novo. United States v. Evans, 42 F.3d

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00206-CR ___________________________ KEVIN WAYNE POWELL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 213th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1563875R Before Sudde

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RUBÉN CASTILLO, Chief Judge. Plaintiff Robert P. Hillmann filed this action against his former employer, the City of Chicago, alleging that his termination was illegal on various grounds. Plaintiff originally brought five claims in this case, alleging breach of contract, discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 1210

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-19-00206-CR ___________________________ KEVIN WAYNE POWELL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 213th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1563875R Before Sudderth, C.J.; Womack and Wallach, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. In this appeal, Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation seeks to overcome one of the most demanding- standards in American law: that defining when a court may vacate a labor-arbitration award. Kennecott appeals the district court’s refusal to do so. The arbitrator issued an award upholding a grievance which challenged a Kennecott rule that employees must repor

597 F.3d 608 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos David CARO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-5. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued October 30, 2009. Decided March 17, 2010. *609 ARGUED: Denise Charlotte Barrett, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Baltimore, Maryland,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES, v. No. 25-cr-150 (TSC) LARRY WHITE (1), MARK ANTHONY FLETCHER III (2), and MALIK KEYON BYNUM (3), Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The Government alleges that on July 2, 2021, Defendants Larry White, Mark Fletch

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. CROIX ERBEY HOLDING CORPORATION; JOHN R. CASE NO. SX-2018-CV-00146 ERBEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BY ITS GENERAL PARTNER JUPITER CAPITAL INC.; SALT Complex Litigation Division POND HOLDINGS, LLC; MUNUS, L.P.; CARISMA TRUST, BY ITS TRUSTEE VENIA, LLC; TRIBUE Action for Damages LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; AND ALTISOURCE ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION,