Cases

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1938 PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Allison D. Burroughs, U.S. District Jud

ACCEPTED 01-15-00478-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/18

Case: 20-30508 Document: 00516100044 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 18, 20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) DOMINGO ARREGUIN GOMEZ, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-01419 (APM)

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE AMERICAN BOTTLING ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No.: N19C-03-048 AML CCLD ) BA SPORTS NUTRITION, LLC and ) THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, ) )

T. MICHAEL PUTNAM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order and Reinstate Case, filed on September 12, 2018 (doc. 18), and the Motion to Reinstate, Motion to Intervene, and Motion to Enforce Attorney's Lien (doc. 20), filed on October 3, 2018 by Steven Mezrano and the Mezrano Law Firm P.C. A hearing was

LIU, J. *250 Defendant Ruben Perez Gomez was sentenced to death in 2000 for the first degree murders of Rajendra Patel and Raul Luna, Jr. He was also sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for the double murder of Robert Acosta and Robert Dunton. This appeal is automat

_ __ CA¢/S'éj' /{/0’ DB'/ff2 C`/_€ 83 MMK 03 0”7§”. i//zz'//§ ' - 70 Fé§,¢/,,.¢ 5 /;105'057 ‘ - . . ' . '\ ./y/L»}”/'" é/.;/.j/ /J ;_/y,z»' dé"”~~,/,///»K//»¢,q,"“. ;>;¢»__/ 4 d t /70 301 /9/3?§,_ b v v ` \ /..)' 010 ,'¢'¢Y~'~W)v ‘/,:;/;r 12 _ ~ 1 ,-2:“/¢»__,§-,.;¢,/5€,.\.,>»¢ ,_'3;; l »-0'7@§@ 207 ,/!.'//”//?,# . /,¢.~?;// w;»;;;;“" '; //f/-.~_f -.» /) f ‘»` ,A jfny,/M /~'Av/ _»;;,"`//»¢L_»';'»»'/" ~/:" 1532er /‘B/.

Filed 1/18/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE ADANNA CAR WASH B313649 CORPORATION, (Los Angeles County Super. Plaintiff and Appellant, Ct. No. 20LBCP00190) v. JESUS GOMEZ, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 11, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1853 Lower Tribunal No. F20-17380 A ________________ Aldrin Gomez-Martinez, Appellant,

OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. MCGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge In an amended complaint, plaintiff Antonia Chico-Gomez (“Chico”) brings this diversity action against Dr, Luis A. Gonzalez Alonso (“Dr. Gonzalez”), SIMED, his insurance company, and others, alleging medical malpractice under Articles 1802 and 1803 of the Puerto Rico Civil Code, P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 31, §§ 5141, 5142. Docket .No. 34. Plain

Summary 2/9/2016 4:30:36 PM Differences exist between documents. New Document: Old Document: 14-857_new 14-857 40 pages (335 KB) 40 pages (272 KB) 2/9/2016 4:30:36 PM 2/9/2016 4:30:36 PM Used to display results. Get started: first change is on page 9. No pages were deleted How to read this report Highlight indicates a change. Deleted indicates deleted content.

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION Lee H. Rosenthal, Chief United States District Judge Satterfield & Pontikes ’ Construction, Inc. (S&P) contracted to build a courthouse in Zapata County, Texas. Various problems came to light in the years following the building’s completion, culminating in a roughly $8 million arbitration award against S&P and in favor of Zapata County. The current lawsuit is about who w

T.S. Ellis, III, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Ramona Rae Gomez, a 57-year old disabled female, filed this employment discrimination suit after defendants Haystax Technology, Inc. and NetCentrics, Inc. terminated her in February 2016. Plaintiff contends that defendants terminated her because of her sex, age, disability, and in retaliation for having taken protected medical leave. Plaintiff allegations include: (i) Disabili

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge. Plaintiff Rick Gomez, is an African-American male and former employee of Defendant the Metropolitan District (the “District”). His Third Amended Complaint [Doc. # 60] alleges that he was terminated and subsequently not hired for a different position at the District due to discrimination on the basis of race and as a resu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CESAR RIVAS, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 23 - 3748 (SLS) v. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan UNITED AMERICAN SECURITY, LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION

281 F.Supp.2d 204 (2003) DISTRICT CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. CIV.A.03-263 RMC. United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 8, 2003. Michael F. Callahan, Thyden, Gross & Callahan, Chevy Chase, MD, for Plaintiff. Cynthia E. Rodgers-Waire, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Balt

OPINION AND ORDER SALVADOR E. CASELLAS, Senior District Judge. Before the Court are plaintiffs Puerto Rican American Insurance Company (“PRAICO”), National Insurance Company (“National”), Integrand Assurance Company (“Integrand”), Cooperativa de Seguros Multiples de Puerto Rico (“Cooperativa”), Caribbean Alliance Insurance Company (“CAICO”), and Universal Insurance Company’s (“Universal”) (collectively “Pl

*581 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BRIONES, District Judge. On this day, the Court considered Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, filed in the above-captioned cause on November 3, 1999. Defendant filed a Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion on November 24, 1999. After due consideration, the Court is of the opinion that Plaintiffs’ Motion s

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2015 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit