⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Goldwater v. Maricopa County Superior Court”

Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 1061; 123 S. Ct. 2223; 71 U.S.L.W. 3735; 155 L. Ed. 2d 1113; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4139
538 U.S. 1061 GOLDWATERv.BALLINGER, JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, MARICOPA COUNTY. No. 02-9724. Supreme Court of United States. May 27, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA. 2 <
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 802; 124 S. Ct. 243; 72 U.S.L.W. 3247; 157 L. Ed. 2d 14; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 7345
Ct. App. Ariz. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certio-rari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 1061; 71 U.S.L.W. 3735; 155 L. Ed. 2d 1113; 123 S. Ct. 2223; 2003 U.S. LEXIS 4140
538 U.S. 1061 GOLDWATERv.McNALLY, JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, MARICOPA COUNTY. No. 02-9725. Supreme Court of United States. May 27, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ARIZONA. 2
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-01-20 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1148
Ct. App. Ariz. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 1061
Ct. App. Ariz. Certio-rari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 1061
Ct. App. Ariz. Certio-rari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 1061
Ct. App. Ariz. Certio-rari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2003-05-27 · Published · cited 0× · 538 U.S. 1061
Ct. App. Ariz. Certio-rari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-01-20 · Published · cited 0× · 540 U.S. 1148; 124 S. Ct. 1167
Ct. App. Ariz. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8.
Arizona Supreme Court · 2026-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH CENTER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, ET AL., Defendants/Appellees. No. CV-25-0033-PR Filed July 17, 2026 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2025-01-31 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE BARRY GOLDWATER INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH CENTER, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, et al., Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 24-0176 FILED 01-31-2025 Appeal from the Superior Court in
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-10-15 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANGEL LOPEZ-VALENZUELA; ISAAC No. 11-16487 CASTRO-ARMENTA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00660- v. SRB JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff, in his official OPINION capacity; COUNTY OF MARICOPA; WILLIAM GERARD MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney, in his
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014-10-15 · Published · cited 20× · 770 F.3d 772; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 19759; 2014 WL 5151625
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANGEL LOPEZ-VALENZUELA; ISAAC No. 11-16487 CASTRO-ARMENTA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00660- v. SRB JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff, in his official OPINION capacity; COUNTY OF MARICOPA; WILLIAM GERARD MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney, in his
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-06-18 · Published · cited 4× · 719 F.3d 1054; 2013 WL 2995220; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12269
OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: In 2006, Arizona voters overwhelmingly approved an amendment to their state constitution known as “Proposition 100.” It commands that Arizona state courts may not set bail “[f]or serious felony offenses as prescribed by the legislature if the person charged has entered or remained in the United States illegally and if the proof is evident or the presumption great as to th
Arizona Supreme Court · 1937-03-15 · Published · cited 8× · 66 P.2d 233; 49 Ariz. 260; 1937 Ariz. LEXIS 234
This proceeding is before us upon a return to a writ ofcertiorari issued out of this court to review the action of the respondent court and the judge thereof in ordering, under the provisions of chapter 29, Laws 1933, as amended by chapter 9, Laws 1935, commonly known as the Mortgage Moratorium Law, a continuance of the trial of an action brought by petitioner, Goldwater, to foreclose a realty mortgage. An inspection of the return made by the respondents to the writ discloses
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2002-09-19 · Published · cited 9× · 53 P.3d 1139; 203 Ariz. 295; 382 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 25; 2002 Ariz. App. LEXIS 145
53 P.3d 1139 (2002) 203 Ariz. 295 BETTER HOMES CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael GOLDWATER, Director of Registrar of Contractors; and Ambassador Plumbing, Inc., an Arizona corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 01-0594. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. July 9, 2002. Redesignated as Opinion
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2020-01-16 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE HAROLD VANGILDER, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant/Appellee/Cross- Appellee, PINAL COUNTY, et al., Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees. No. 1 CA-TX 19-0001 FILED 1-16-2020
Arizona Supreme Court · 2022-03-08 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA HAROLD VANGILDER, ET AL., Plaintiffs/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellee, PINAL COUNTY, ET AL., Defendants/Appellants/Cross-Appellees. No. CV-20-0040-PR
Arizona Supreme Court · 1970-02-27 · Published · cited 81× · 466 P.2d 18; 105 Ariz. 413; 1970 Ariz. LEXIS 282
105 Ariz. 413 (1970) 466 P.2d 18 Wendell C. KILPATRICK, Arthur J. Bowling, John Hempler, Harvey Lewellen, Vernon Groves, Tom Cobb, and Zane Porter, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT of Arizona, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable Morris Rozar; Roy Miller, as surviving father of Carolyn J. Miller, deceased, on behalf of himself and his wife, Annie M. Miller, surviving mother of Carolyn J. Miller, deceased, and Ant
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973-05-17 · Published · cited 5× · 509 P.2d 1043; 20 Ariz. App. 6; 1973 Ariz. App. LEXIS 610
20 Ariz. App. 6 (1973) 509 P.2d 1043 Ethel A. PATRICK, Executrix of the Estate of Lyle H. Patrick, Deceased, and Ethel A. Patrick, a widow, Appellants, v. ASSOCIATED DRYGOODS CORPORATION (GOLDWATER'S DIVISION) and Jerold Kaplan, Appellees. No. 1 CA-CIV 1905. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department A. May 17, 1973.