Cases

MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO AMENDED CLAIM OF DIAN HARRISON DENNIS MONTALI, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge On August 11, 2011, Dian Harrison (“Claimant”) filed a proof of claim (Claim 82-1) (“Original Claim”) for a lump sum of $205,500 for severance benefits pursuant to a written agreement dated January 1, 2000 with debtor Golden Gate Community Health (“GGCH” or “Debtor”). See Clai

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s order is VACATED. This matter is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the decision in Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc., 147 A.3d 490, 2016 WL 5630669 (Pa. 2016).

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Superior Court’s order is VACATED. This matter is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the decision in Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc., 147 A.3d 490, 2016 WL 5630669 (Pa. 2016).

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT DEBORA A. STUBITS, ADMINISTRATRIX : No. 250 WAL 2016 OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD F. : DOMBROWSKI : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Unpublished Judgment Order and v. : Order of the Superior Court at No. 1160 : WDA 2015 entered on May 26, 2016, GOLDEN GATE NATI

Filed 7/13/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE GOLDEN GATE LAND HOLDINGS LLC et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, A163315 v. (Alameda County DIRECT ACTION EVERYWHERE, Super. Ct. No. RG21091697) Defendant and Appellant. Defen

THOMPSON, K., JUDGE: Golden Gate National Senior Care, LLC d/b/a Golden Living, its affiliated entities,1 and Dana Boblitt in her capacity as administrator of Golden LivingCenter - Mt. Holly (collectively Golden) appeal from an order of the Jefferson Circuit Court denying its motion to compel arbitration and dismiss or stay the pending litigation. After reviewing the record and applicable law, we affir

SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. OPINION JUSTICE DONOHUE *1015 The Office of the Attorney General ("OAG"), on behalf of the Commonwealth, filed suit against more than two dozen n

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN R. TUNHEIM, Chief Judge United States District Court Julie Scharber, Kirsten Hahn, Barbara Shoemaker, and Melissa Farr (collectively “relators”) brought this qui tam action pursuant to the Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq., and the Minnesota False Claims Act (“MFCA”), Minn. Stat. § 15C.01 et seq,,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER . DONOVAN W. FRANK, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION Relators Ricia Johnson and Health Dimensions Rehabilitation, Inc. (“HDR”) (together, “Relators”) initiated this qui tam action, on behalf of the United States of America (the “Government”), against Defendants Golden Gate National Senior Care, L.L.C.; GGNSC Holdings, L.L.C; and GGNSC Wayzata

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania : Acting by Attorney General, : Kathleen Kane, : Plaintiff : : v. : : Golden Gate National Senior Care LLC; : GGNSC Holdings LLC; GGNSC : Administrative Services LLC; GGNSC : Clinical Services LLC; GGNSC Equity : Holdings

132 Cal.Rptr.2d 46 (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 345 PLANNED PARENTHOOD GOLDEN GATE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jeannette GARIBALDI et al., Defendants and Appellants. Planned Parenthood Golden Gate, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Rossi Foti, Defendant and Appellant. Nos. A098455, A098457, A096588. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two. March

OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Howard Groner and the Metropolitan Strategy Group, a nonprofit housing rights organization, brought suit against the owners and the manager of Golden Gate Gardens Apartments under the federal Fair Housing Act and Ohio’s analogous anti-discrimination housing provisions. The dispute arose when Golden Gate threatened to evict Groner, a tenant with a known mental disability, f

535 F.Supp.2d 968 (2007) GOLDEN GATE RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and Does 1-15, Defendants. No. C 06-06997 JSW. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 26, 2007. *969 *970 Richard Charles Rybicki, Dickenson, Peatman & Fogarty, Napa

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 251 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 252 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT

Opinion HAERLE, J. I. Introduction Petitioner, Planned Parenthood Golden Gate (Planned Parenthood), and real parties in interest Rossi Foti and Jeannette Garibaldi are parties in litigation concerning the scope of the real parties’ rights to engage in antiabortion protest activities outside Planned Parenthood facilities. Planned Parenthood initiated this original proceeding to challenge a s

250 F.3d 1039 (6th Cir. 2001) Howard Groner and Metropolitan Strategy Group, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.Golden Gate Gardens Apartments, Midwest Management, Inc., Robert Goldberg, and Hillcrest Golden Gate, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-3189 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Argued: May 4, 2001Decided and Filed: May 25, 2001

FILED MAR 2 9 2018 U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS 3Jn tbe Wntteb ~tates q[:ourt of jfeberal q[:Iatms No . 13-307C

Opinion GILBERT, P. J. Here we hold, among other things, that homeowners associations may adopt reasonable rules and impose fees on members relating to short-term rentals of condominium units. Two owners of one lot in a common interest development and one of two owners of another lot bro

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Jennifer L. Thurston, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants Bear Valley Community Services District and David Edmonds seek of the first claim for relief in the Third Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Laura Hutchinson pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 34) Defendants assert Plaintiff is unable to. state.a claim for

140 Nev., Advance Opinion I LI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC, A No. 79658 NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, D/B/A CENTENNIAL HILLS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant, vs. FILED DWAYNE ANTHONY MURRAY, INDIVIDU