Cases

OPINION KEM THOMPSON FROST, Chief Justice. In this appeal we address two issues relating to the propriety of a warrant for a blood draw from an individual suspected of driving while intoxicated: (1) Does Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 18.01(j) allow a police officer to obtain a warrant for a blood draw if a suspect has consented to a breath tes

706 P.2d 13 (1985) Richard ASATO, Claimant-Appellant, v. MEADOW GOLD DAIRIES-HAWAII, Employer/Self-Insured-Appellee, and Special Compensation Fund, Appellee. Hideo NOBUJI, Claimant-Appellant, v. SCHUMAN CARRIAGE COMPANY, Employer-Appellee, and Argonaut Insurance Company, Ins. Carrier-Appellee. William YAMAMOTO, Claimant-Appellant, v. SCHUMAN CARRIAGE COMPANY, Employer-Appellee, and Travelers Insurance Company, Ins. Carrier

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This case involves a large-scale conspiracy to import and distribute cocaine from Panama within the United States. The principal evidence against defendants-appellants at trial was the testimony of a former coconspirator who became a government informant. Defendants-appellants challenge their convictions on numerous grounds. After reviewing the record, we

987 F.Supp. 741 (1997) GOLD STAR TAXI AND TRANSPORTATION SERVICE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MALL OF AMERICA COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. Civ. 3-96-895. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division. December 18, 1997. *742 *743 Douglas Anderson Hedin, Daniel S. Goldberg, Elizabet

PER CURIAM. For the reasons given in Parts I and II of the opinion filed by Judge Morris Sheppard Arnold, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the order is vacated. Aroma-tique’s federal trademarks at issue here, Reg. Nos. 1,492,855 and 1,492,856, are can-celled. Gold Seal’s request for attorneys’ fees is denied. MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. This case

ANDERSON, J. delivered the opinion of the court. Where an issue out of chancery was directed to be tried at the bar of the common law court, it was a *well established rule of practice, before the common law and chancery jurisdictions were united in the same judge, that the verdict of the jury should be certified by the judge before whom the issue was tried to the chancellor; and that a motion to set aside the ver

ANDERSON, J. delivered the opinion of the court. Where an issue out of chancery was directed to be tried at the bar of the common law court, it was a *well established rule of practice, before the common law and chancery jurisdictions were united in the same judge, that the verdict of the jury should be certified by the judge before whom the issue was tried to the chancellor; and that a motion to set aside the ver

ANDERSON, J. delivered the opinion of the court. Where an issue out of chancery was directed to be tried at the bar of the common law court, it was a *well established rule of practice, before the common law and chancery jurisdictions were united in the same judge, that the verdict of the jury should be certified by the judge before whom the issue was tried to the chancellor; and that a motion to set aside the ver

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2014 UT 46 IN THE S UPREME C OURT OF THE S TATE OF U TAH MERRILL COOK , PAUL BRUGGER, and MARA BRENENSTALL, Appellants, v. LT . GOVERNOR GREG BELL and SALT LAKE COUNTY CLERK ’S OFFICE , Appellees.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49772 DEBRA ABELL, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, May 2023 Term ) v. ) Opinion Filed: August 22, 202

FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit November 2, 2016 PUBLISH Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court

788 F.Supp.2d 1001 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Trace Rae THOMS and Jennifer Anne Thoms, Defendants. No. 3:10-cr-00069 JWS. United States District Court, D. Alaska. April 22, 2011. *1003 Stephan A. Collins, U.S. Attorney's Office, Anchorage, AK, for Plaintiff. ORDER AND OPINION [

504 P.2d 760 (1972) William I. CUNNINGHAM, Appellant, Jean Cunningham et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF BROOKINGS, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of Oregon, Department 2. Argued and Submitted June 20, 1972. Decided December 22, 1972. Thomas Y. Higashi, Gold Beach, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Starkw

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PAUL L. BROWNING, No. 15-99002 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 3:05-cv-00087- RCJ-WGC RENEE BAKER, Warden; ADAM PAUL LAXALT, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, OPINION Respondents-Appellees.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge I. Introduction Plaintiff Dion Black (“Mr. Black”) filed this lawsuit after being reassigned by Defendant, the District of Columbia (“the District”), to a new position within the District’s Department of Transportation (“DDOT”). Mr. Black alleges four claims: (1) violation of his due process rights; (2) conspiracy

OPINION MAASSEN, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION A woman was admitted to a hospital emergency room with pregnancy-related complications. The attending physician recommended that she be transported by medivac to a different facility. The woman and her husband informed the physician that they needed their insurer’s preauthorization for th

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49772 DEBRA ABELL, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Boise, May 2023 Term ) v. ) Opinion Filed: August 22, 20

11/05/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON June 5, 2018 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANTONIO BENSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 13-04060 Lee V. Coffee, Judge ___________________________________

NUMBER 13-09-00059-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG BELEN GARZA, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 105th District Court

615 S.E.2d 196 (2005) 273 Ga. App. 357 THOMAS v. The STATE. No. A05A0796. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 20, 2005. *198 Martin G. Hilliard, Savannah, for appellant. Spencer L. Lawton, Jr., District Attorney, Ronald M. Adams, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. RUFFIN, Chief Judge.