Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 28, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D21-44 Lower Tribunal Nos. 18-3091 SP, 19-170 AP ________________ Alina Nuñez, et al., Appellants,

NO. 07-04-0404-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 13, 2005 ______________________________ ARTURO MARTINEZ NUNEZ, APPELLANT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., Appellant, v. ROBERT A. GORE, SR., individually, and as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF GLORIA H. GORE, Appellee. No. 4D20-932 [April 13, 2022] Appeal and cross-appeal from t

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Dennis Lebwohl, J.), dated March 21, 2014. The order denied the motion of Tin Yat Chin to vacate a final order of protection of that court dated February 21, 2014, which, after an inquest, and upon a finding that he committed family offenses within the meaning of Family Court Act § 812, directed him to stay away from the petitioner and observe other stated c

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Dennis Lebwohl, J.), dated April 11, 2014. The order denied the father’s motion to vacate an order of protection which was entered upon his failure to appear at a hearing. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. “A party seeking to vacate an order of protection entered upon his or he

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Katz, J.), dated July 31, 2012, as, after a hearing, granted that branch of the father’s petition which was to modify so much of a prior order of the same court (Pearl, J.), dated September 14, 2006, as awarded the mother custody of the parties’ son so as to award the father sole cus

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Katz, J.), dated July 31, 2012, as, after a hearing, granted that branch of the father’s petition which was to modify so much of a prior order of the same court (Pearl, J.), dated September 14, 2006, as awarded the mother custody of the parties’ son so as to award the father sole cus

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (David Klein, J.), dated November 15, 2014. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied, after a hearing, the mother’s petition to modify the custody provisions of a so ordered stipulation dated June 22, 2011, so as to award her sole legal and physical custody of the parties’ children and granted the father’s cross petition for the same relief. By decisi

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-KA-00790-COA KENYA CLAY APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/24/2021 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARK SHELDON DUNCAN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: NESHOBA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY

In a custody and visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Woods, J.), entered April 30, 2013, which, after a hearing, inter alia, granted that branch of the father’s petition which was, in effect, to modify an order of custody and visitation of the same court dated May 24, 2012, entered upon stipulation of the parties, so as

Emilio Nunez, J. In this action brought to recover for personal injuries and medical and hospital expenses, the infant plaintiff was awarded $75,000 by the jury, and his mother was awarded the sum of $10,185.60. Upon rendition of the verdict, the defendant moved to set it aside upon all the grounds set forth in the CPLB, except inadequacy. The infant plaintiff, then 11 years old, was injured August 21, 1958,

74 P.3d 903 (2003) Brandywyn McELROY, Appellant, v. Albert KENNEDY, Appellee. No. S-10380. Supreme Court of Alaska. August 1, 2003. *904 Gloria Hanssen Hooper, Fairbanks, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee. Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices. OPINION<

814 F.Supp.2d 102 (2011) Esmelinda PÉREZ, Plaintiff, v. SAINT JOHN'S SCHOOL, Defendant. Civil No. 09-2170 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 30, 2011. *105 Manuel Duran-Rodriguez, Manuel Duran Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Martha L. Martinez-Rodriguez, Olga Y. Cabrera-Ramos, Linda S.

672 F.Supp.2d 1378 (2010) In re: AIR CRASH AT MADRID, SPAIN, ON AUGUST 20, 2008. MDL No. 2135. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. February 12, 2010. Before ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Acting Chairman, JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman,[*] KATHRYN H. VRATIL, DAVID R. HANSEN,[*] W. ROYAL FURGESON, JR., FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. and DAVID G. TRAG

132 Nev., Advance Opinion 70 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA LISA JOHNSON, No. 66094 Appellant, vs. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL !LED ASSOCIATION, SEP 2 9 2016

132 Nev., Advance Opinion 70 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA LISA JOHNSON, No. 66094 Appellant, vs. WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL !LED ASSOCIATION, SEP 2 9 2016

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Valeria Nunez Cruz brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to obtain judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her claim for disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. The Commissioner moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), entered August 7, 1998, which granted the separate motions of the defendants St. Luke’s Hospital, Kathleen Pappis, and Louis Nunez and the defendant Edgard Quinones to strike the action from the calendar, unless the plaintiff filed a note of issue within 30 days. Ordered that the order i

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 13-10869 August 6, 2014