⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Gloria Jean Lam”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-01-20 · Published · cited 0×
8/26/13 Oj-llj--0009-1-of We doing job cont. I Regina wasuse, by suspects doing a so call job. Tamper with mail, In and out apartment. No work order Please record harassment on property at; istcourtof appeals HOUSTON, TEXAS New Hope Apartments lAM 9 fl 7niR 320 Ha
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018-06-06 · Published · cited 1× · 251 So. 3d 950
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 6, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D18-755 Lower Tribunal No. 17-2393 ________________ Sands Pointe Ocean Beach Resort Condominium Association, Inc., etc.,
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989-06-14 · Published · cited 34× · 539 N.E.2d 1006; 405 Mass. 141; 1989 Mass. LEXIS 175
405 Mass. 141 (1989) 539 N.E.2d 1006 COMMONWEALTH vs. LIONEL J. PARADISE, JR. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Worcester. February 7, 1989. June 14, 1989. Present: WILKINS, LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, & LYNCH, JJ. John F. Buckley for the defendant. Katherine E. McMahon, Assistant District Attorney, for the C
Strauss v. Hortonpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2009-06-17 · Published · cited 65× · 46 Cal. 4th 364
46 Cal.4th 364 (2009) ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___ ___ P.3d ___ KAREN L. STRAUSS et al., Petitioners, v. MARK B. HORTON, as State Registrar of Vital Statistics, etc., et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. ROBIN TYLER et al., Petitioners, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Respondents; DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH et al., Interveners. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO e
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004-10-26 · Published · cited 74× · 387 F.3d 1146; 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2473; 175 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3146; 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 22270; 2004 WL 2403115
EBEL, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, a group of former employees of Defendant Lucent Technologies, Inc. (“Defendant”), sued Defendant in state court for fraud arising out of alleged misrepresentations made in encouraging Plaintiffs to take an early retirement benefits package. Defendant removed the case to federal court on the basis of complete preemption under the Employee Retire
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS