Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gloria Ann Curry”
Fleming v. Currypublic domain
OPINION TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice. In these consolidated appeals, we review the summary judgments granted to several hundred plaintiffs on their breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims against the attorney and law firm that represented them in their personal-injury claims arising from their use of diet drugs. The law firm screened tens of thousands of clients for eligibility to opt out of a class-action settleme
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00182-CV ___________________________ GLORIA OWENS, Appellant V. GEORGE T. CURRY, TRUSTEE OF THE MILTON C. CURRY & MAMIE W. CURRY REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, AND CHARLES ESTER CURRY,
Gloria Flores Robles v. Statepublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-09-00204-CR GLORIA FLORES ROBLES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 08-00730-CRF-272
Lane v. WJ. Curry & Sonspublic domain
We granted review in this case to determine whether a landowner can bring a nuisance action against an adjoining landowner when tree branches and roots from the adjoining landowner's property encroach upon and damage the neighboring landowner's property. The plaintiff asserts that encroaching branches and roots from the defendant's trees constitute a nuisance for which she is entitled to seek damages. The defendant responds that the plaintiff's sole remedy is self-help and, therefore,
Curry v. Moodypublic domain
40 Cal.App.4th 1547 (1995) 48 Cal. Rptr.2d 627 ARLISS S. CURRY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ANN MOODY et al., Defendants and Appellants. Docket No. B085769. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven. December 12, 1995. *1550 COUNSEL William R. Larr and Brian K. Brooke
August 20, 2013 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees NO. 14-11-01093-CV NO. 14-12-00300-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellants V. ALVAREZ, CAROLYN B., AMAN, MARIA
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 20, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-11-01093-CV GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, LLP, Appellants V. TAMMYLERN CURRY, RICHARD SZYMANSKI, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF MARION SZYMANSKI, EMILIE WHITEHEAD, CONNIE BOHANNON, AND LINDA SCOTT, Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District C
State v. Glennpublic domain
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Marquez Devon Glenn, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2018-001478 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal From Greenville County The Honorable John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 27935 Heard October 29, 2019 – Filed December 18, 2019 REVERSED AND REMANDED Christopher Todd Br
Page v. Virginia State Board of Electionspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT E. PAYNE, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the non-party Christopher Marston’s MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS TO ROBERT B. BELL, WILLIAM ROBERT JANIS, AND CHRISTOPHER MAR-STON AND/OR FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, Docket No. 61. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be denied in part. BACKGROUND Dawn Curry Page, Glor
David Gordan Schmidt (d/B/A ABC Bonding Company) and Greenbrier Equities, LLC v. Brenda Crawfordpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PEREZ, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ANNIE J. BUTLER, ANTHO
Johnson v. Statepublic domain
190 S.W.3d 838 (2006) Columbus Earl JOHNSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-04-419-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. March 30, 2006. Donald S. Gandy, Fort Worth, for Appellant. *839 Tim Curry, Criminal District Atty., Charles M. Mallin, Chief, Appellate Division, Danielle A. Legault, Robert Foran a
Page v. Virginia State Board of Electionspublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: In the political landscape prior to the Supreme Court’s June 25, 2013, decision in Shelby County v. Holder, — U.S. —, 133 S.Ct. 2612, 186 L.Ed.2d 651 (2013), the Virginia legislature undertook the task of crafting United States congressional districts with the overarching goal of compliance with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (‘VRA”) as it was then interpreted.
179 F.Supp.2d 1128 (2001) COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT, Plaintiff, v. CENCO REFINING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. CV00-5665(AHM)(AIJX). United States District Court, C.D. California. September 26, 2001. *1129 *1130 David A. Rosen, Gideon Kracov, Rose Klein & Marias, Los Angeles
Curtis v. Statepublic domain
LEE ANN DAUPHINOT, Justice dissenting. I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s disposition of Appellant’s third and fourth points because the majority appears to misconstrue Appellant’s purpose for offering the evidence that the trial court excluded. As the majority concedes, The DNA evidence that Appellant had sexual intercourse with King [the complaina
180 F.Supp.2d 1062 (2001) COMMUNITIES FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT, Plaintiff, v. CENCO REFINING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. CV 00-5665 AHM(AIJx). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 22, 2001. *1063 *1064 *1065 David A. Rosen, Gideon Kracov
Vallado v. Statepublic domain
350 S.W.3d 257 (2011) Rudy L. VALLADO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 04-10-00328-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. June 22, 2011. *258 Angela J. Moore, Rogers & Moore of Counsel, Boerne, TX, for Appellant. Mary Beth Welsh, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Appellee.<
Rudy L. Vallado v. Statepublic domain
OPINION <
Rudy L. Vallado v. Statepublic domain
OPINION No. 04-10-00328-CR Rudy L. VALLADO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Ulmer v. Ulmerpublic domain
130 S.W.3d 294 (2004) Mark David ULMER, Appellant, v. Dawn ULMER, Appellee. No. 14-03-00125-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). February 12, 2004. *295 Mack J. Travers, Emanuel Joseph Caiati, Katy, for appellant. Alan Curry, Houston, for appellee. En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice HEDGES, Just
John West v. Statepublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana No. 06-18-00219-CR JOHN WEST, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 196th District Court Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 32151 Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens