⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Global IP Holdings, LLC v. Columbia Care Eastern Virginia, LLC”

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-15-00991-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-05-23 · Published · cited 63× · 753 F.3d 1015; 60 Communications Reg. (P&F) 381; 2014 WL 2142106; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 9637
BRISCOE, Chief Judge. In late 2011, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or Commission) issued a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Order) comprehensively reforming and modernizing its universal service and intercarrier compensation systems. Petitioners, each of whom were parties to the FCC’s rule-making proceeding below, filed petitions for judicial review of the FCC’s Order. The Judicial Pa
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012-12-18 · Published · cited 18× · 910 F. Supp. 2d 861; 2012 WL 6607142; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178966
OPINION AND ORDER MARK S. DAVIS, District Judge. This matter is currently before the Court on several motions to dismiss: (1) Defendants Greenhorne & O’Mara, Inc. (“Greenhorne”), Thomas Copeland (“Copeland”), Evelyn Jones, and Daniel Jones’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Local Rule 7 (Docket No. 7); (2) Defendant City of Chesapeake, Virg
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-05-17 · Published · cited 362× · 925 F.3d 606
KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Sharyl Thompson Attkisson, James Howard Attkisson, and Sarah Judith Starr Attkisson appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of their claims in the Eastern District of Virginia. The plaintiffs sued a number of named and unnamed government officials for alleged illegal intrusions into the plaintiffs' electronic devices to conduct unlawful surveillance, and also sued certain corporate entitie
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-03-21 · Published · cited 0× · 919 F.3d 789
*792KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Sharyl Thompson Attkisson, James Howard Attkisson, and Sarah Judith Starr Attkisson appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of their claims in the Eastern District of Virginia. The plaintiffs sued a number of named and unnamed government officials for alleged illegal intrusions into
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016-09-14 · Published · cited 8× · 207 F. Supp. 3d 585; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171854; 2016 WL 6952109
ORDER Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence (Dkt. No. 47). After careful review of the parties’ briefs and following a hearing held on September 6, 2016, the Court denies Defendant’s motion. I. Background Defendant is charged with possession of child pornography, in violatio
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-02-12 · Published · cited 4× · 816 F.3d 721; 117 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1817; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452
*726Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge TARANTO, in which Chief Judge PROST and Circuit Judges NEWMAN, LOURIE, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, CHEN, and STOLL join. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge DYK, in which Circuit Judge HUGHES joins. TARANTO, Circuit. Judge. Congress has declared: “Except as otherwise provided in [the Patent A
District Court, S.D. New York · 2015-03-31 · Published · cited 48× · 96 F. Supp. 3d 182; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43026; 2015 WL 1455805
OPINION & ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Plaintiffs The 2002 Lawrence R. Buchal-ter Alaska Trust (“the Trust”), Alaska Trust Company, and Stephen C. Harris (“Harris”) assert seven causes of action against Defendant Philadelphia Financial Life Assurance Company (“PFLAC”), formerly known as AGL Life Assurance Company, from which the Trust purchased a variable universal life insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019-06-10 · Published · cited 0×
ON REHEARING PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1677 SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON; JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON; SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., Individually; PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Individually; UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE DEPARTME
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013-12-19 · Published · cited 223× · 83 A.3d 901; 623 Pa. 564
*913 OPINION Chief Justice CASTILLE. Mr. Chief Justice Castille announces the Judgment of the Court. Mr. Chief Justice Castille delivers the Opinion of the Court with respect to Parts I, II, IV, V, and VT(A), (B), (D)-(G), in which Mr. Justice Baer, Madame Justice Todd, and Mr. Justice McCaffery join, and delivers an Opinion with respect to
District Court, E.D. New York · 2011-05-16 · Published · cited 10× · 792 F. Supp. 2d 343; 2011 WL 1901645
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: I.Introduction...............................................................347 II.Facts.....................................................................349 A. Defendant’s Childhood..................................................349
United States Tax Court · 2020-11-18 · Published · cited 0× · 155 T.C. No. 10
155 T.C. No. 10 UNITED STATES TAX COURT THE COCA-COLA COMPANY & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 31183-15. Filed November 18, 2020. P, a U.S. corporation, was the legal owner of the intellectual property (IP) necessary to manufacture, distribute, and sell some of the best-known beverage brands in the world. This IP included trade- marks, product names, lo
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 34× · 600 U.S. 181
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 189× · 600 U.S. 181
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 181–411 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 29, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
District Court, E.D. New York · 2008-09-05 · Published · cited 22× · 253 F.R.D. 69; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71037
MEMORANDUM & ORDER MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: *71Table of Contents I. Introduction.............................................................75 A. Overview............................................................75 B. Plaintiffs’ C
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-05-01 · Published · cited 52× · 251 F. Supp. 2d 176; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7834; 2003 WL 2010983
251 F.Supp.2d 176 (2003) Senator Mitch McCONNELL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, et al., Defendants. National Rifle Association of America, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants. Emily Echols, a minor child, by and through her next friends, Tim and Windy Echols, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, et al., Defendants. Chamber of Commerce of the United
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023-04-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA William Penn School District; : Panther Valley School District; : The School District of Lancaster; : Greater Johnstown School District; : Wilkes-Barre Area School District; : Shenandoah Valley School District; : Jamella and Bryant Miller, parents of : K.M., a minor; Sheila Armstrong, : parent of S.A., minor; Tracey Hughes, : parent of P.M.H., minor; Pennsylvania : Association of R
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996-06-11 · Published · cited 126× · 929 F. Supp. 824; 4 Communications Reg. (P&F) 590; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7919; 1996 WL 311865
929 F.Supp. 824 (1996) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, et al., v. Janet RENO, Attorney General of the United States. AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., v. UNITED STATES DEP'T OF JUSTICE, et al. Civil Action Nos. 96-963, 96-1458. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. June 11, 1996. *825 Christopher
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017-09-26 · Published · cited 6× · 576 B.R. 325
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING FIXTURE CLASSIFICATION AND VALUATION MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction... 339 A. Fixtures .. .340 B. Valuation.. .341 II. Background.. .342