Cases

PER CURIAM. Defendants-appellants Phoenix Hotel Associates, Ltd., Condor Investment Group, and Phoenix Hotel Associates Limited (collectively, “Associates”) appeal from the October 19, 2004, order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Richard J. Holwell, J.) remanding the suit of plaintiff-appellee Phoenix Global Ventures, LLC (“Ventures”), to New York Supreme Court pursuant to 28

422 F.3d 72 PHOENIX GLOBAL VENTURES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.PHOENIX HOTEL ASSOCIATES, LTD., a California Limited Partnership, Condor Investment Group, a Delaware Corporation and Phoenix Hotel Associates Limited, efendants-Appellants,Central & Adams Management Co., a California Corp., Defendant.Docket No. 04-5713-CV. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: August

Judge Terri F. Love This appeal arises from a disputed claim for compensation filed by the plaintiff for injuries sustained while on the job. After a door closed on plaintiff's foot at the hotel where she was working, she was unable to continue working. Plaintiff began to receive workers' compensation benefits, but the benefits were terminated approximately two years after injury. Plaintiff then filed a disputed claim for compensati

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION YOUNG, D.J. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, Sheena Grice (“Grice”), filed this action against the defendants VIM Holdings Group, LLC (“VIM”), its manager Michael D’Ambrose and its member Hirsch Mohindra (“Mohindra”), B Financial, LLC (“B Financial”) and its manager John Bartlett (“Bartlett”), U Solutions

MAYER, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The claims asserted by DDR Holdings, LLC (“DDR”) fall outside 35 U.S.C. § 101 because they simply describe an abstract concept — that an online merchant’s sales can be increased if two web pages have the same “look and feel” — and apply that concept using a generic computer. I. The common specification of DDR’

FILED Apr 28 2020, 8:34 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

16‐3292‐cv Williams v. Affinion Group, LLC United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2017 No. 16‐3292‐cv DEBBIE WILLIAMS, Regina Warfel, individually and on behalf of all others si

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AB STABLE VIII LLC, § § No. 71, 2021 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. 2020-0310 MAPS HOTELS AND RESORTS § ONE LLC, MIRAE ASSET CAPITAL § CO., L

458 B.R. 560 (2011) In re HOTELS NEVADA, LLC; Inns Nevada, LLC, Debtors. Nos. BK-S-09-31131-BAM, BK-S-09-31132-BAM. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada. September 14, 2011. *563 Brian Sirower, Catherine M. Guastello, Quarles & Brady LLP, Phoenix, AZ, Marjorie A. Guymon, Goldsmith & Guymon, P.C., Las Vegas, NV, for Debtors.<

Filed 9/21/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ENDEAVOR OPERATING B323865 COMPANY, LLC, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 21STCV23693) v. HDI GLOBAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT Richard M. Platkin, J. In this special proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 75, petitioner 797 Broadway Group, LLC moves to modify and confirm, as modified, a final arbitral award. Respondent BCI Construction, Inc. (BCI) opposes the application and cross-moves to, among other things, vacate the award. Background Broadway is a New York limited

Filed 10/19/23 (unmodified opn. attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO ENDEAVOR OPERATING B323865 COMPANY, LLC, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 21STCV23693) v.

TARANTO, Circuit Judge. This case involves the eligibility for patenting, under 35 U.S.C. § 101, of certain claims of three of Electric Power Group, LLC’s patents, U.S. Patent Nos. 7,233,843; 8,060,259; and 8,401,710. Those patents describe and claim systems and methods for performing real-time performance monitoring of an electric power grid by collecting data from multiple dat

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: Plaintiff The Chamberlain Group, Inc. (“Chamberlain”) is a Connecticut corporation with a principal place of business in Elmhurst, Illinois. (R.51, Second Amended Complt., ¶ 1.) Chamberlain sells garage door openers and related accessories. (Id,, ¶¶ 2, 3.) Defendant Nortek Security & Control LLC (“Nortek” or “Defendant

OPINION OF THE COURT Friedman, J.P. Petitioner acquired a failing business pursuant to an asset purchase agreement that specifically excludes from the assets and liabilities being transferred to the buyer any “brokerage or finders’ fees ... or other similar payments” owed by the seller. The asset purchase agreement further specifically provides that the seller and the buyer will each bear its own “Transac

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ENDOWMENT RESEARCH GROUP, ) LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0627-KSJM ) WILDCAT VENTURE PARTNERS, ) LLC, and BILL ERICSON, )

JMA PAINTERS, LLC * NO. 2022-CA-0732 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL THE MCDONNEL GROUP, * LLC, AND TRAVELERS FOURTH CIRCUIT CASUALTY AND SURETY * COMPANY OF AMERICA STATE OF LOUISIANA ******* APPEAL FROM CIVI

AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed August 7, 2024 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-01295-CV CAMILLE COOPER, ROBERT NEVAREZ, THE ORSALO GROUP, LLC, LARRY COOK, AND 5TH AVENUE ACQUISITIONS & VENTURE CAPITALISTS, LLC, Appellants V. TCH ALTERA AHCC, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from

Chief Justice Hecht delivered the opinion of the Court. Wildcatting is speculative business, especially in a foreign country, but it is business nonetheless. Data is gathered', risks are assessed, deals are reached, and money is made and lost,' all in something of a competitive market.- An investment is sometimes a roll of the dice ’ but other times a cold calculation. The law does not compensate gambling losse

NORTH SAILS GROUP, LLC v. BOARDS AND MORE GMBH ET AL. (SC 20338) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js.* Syllabus The plaintiff, N Co., sought to recover damages from the defendants, B Co. and E Co., for breach of a trademark licensing agreement, pursuant to which B Co. was granted a worldwide license to use N Co.’s trade name and certain