Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Global Container Lines Limited”
868 F.Supp. 599 (1994) ROYAL SWAN NAVIGATION COMPANY LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. GLOBAL CONTAINER LINES, LTD., Defendant. No. 94 Civ. 7129 (HB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 16, 1994. *600 Todd P. Kenyon and William N. France, Healy & Baillie, New York City, for plaintiff. Peter G. Drakos and Christ
347 F.Supp.2d 749 (2004) AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY; AIU Company, Plaintiffs, v. TGL CONTAINER LINES, LTD.; Trans Global Logistics(S) Pte Ltd.; Hanjin Shipping Company Ltd.; M/V Hanjin Pennsylvania, Defendants. TGL Container Lines, Ltd.; Trans Global Logistics(S) Pte Ltd., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. The Hanjin Pennsylvania; Hanjin Shipping Company Ltd., Third-Party Defendants. No. C 03-5190MHP.
Dyncorp, Inc. v. Ocean Marine Navigation Co.public domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. After full review of the case, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(b). Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decis
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Now pending before the Court is the motion of Defendant American Global Logistics, LLC (“Defendant” or “AGL”) for partial summary judgment against Plaintiff Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (“Plaintiff’ or “MOL”). ECF No. 123 (“Mot.”).1 The motion is ful
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO PARTIALLY DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Now before the Court are two motions to partially dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 72 (“SAC”), of Plaintiff Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (“MOL”), a Japanese corporation. Specifically, the motions seek dismissal of the SAC’s fourth and fifth claim
Inmarsat Global v. SpeedCast Intlpublic domain
Case: 22-20274 Document: 00516844626 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
*490OPINION & ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Global Packaging Services, LLC (“Plaintiff”), a packaging company incorporated in Florida, brings claims for breach of contract and tortious interference against Global Printing and Packaging (“Defendant”), a printing solutions company incorporated in Massachusetts, arisin
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On December 21, 2016, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Temporary Restraining Order (the “TRO Opinion” or the “TRO,” ECF Doc. # 35),1 enjoining the Bermuda Insurers from taking any action to enforce certain provisions of the Injunc-tive Orders (defined below) issued by the Su
Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Rendered in Part and Memorandum Opinion filed September 17, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00356-CV HTS SERVICES INC., Appellant V. AINUL ABEDIN AND PACKWELL CONTAINER LINE INC., Appellees On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris Cou
Summit Global Contractors, Inc. v. Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership and Enbridge Gathering (North Texas) L.P.public domain
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed December 10, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00052-CV SUMMIT GLOBAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellant V. ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND ENBRIDGE GATHERING (NORTH TEXAS) L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FINDING THAT THE BERMUDA INSURERS VIOLATED THE BARTON DOCTRINE MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This is the fourth written opinion in this adversary proceeding since it was filed on October 27, 2016, with each of the opinions addressing whether this Court or a court in Bermuda can and will address the claims and defenses arising in this case, including whether the
Radiant Global Logistics, Inc. v. Furstenaupublic domain
On September 7, 2018, Radiant filed a six-count Verified Complaint ("Complaint") against Charles "Chad" Furstenau, Jr., and BTX Air Express of Detroit, a Connecticut limited liability company ("BTX Detroit"), alleging the following claims: Count I - Declaratory Judgment (Against Furstenau); Count II - Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Against Furstenau); Count III - Misa
Inguran, LLC v. Abs Global, Inc.public domain
Case: 22-1385 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 07/05/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INGURAN, LLC, DBA STGENETICS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ABS GLOBAL, INC., GENUS PLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2022-1385 ______________________ Appeal from the United St
Reverse and Render; Opinion Filed January 27, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00183-CV SANTOS NAVARRO ROSALES, Appellant V. LONE STAR CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th District Court
In re MF Global Holdings Ltd.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LIFTING AUTOMATIC STAY TO PERMIT PAYMENTS OF DEFENSE COSTS UNDER CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Once again, former MF Global directors and officers (the “Individual Insureds”1) *196ask the Court for relief so they can access proceeds of cer
*83MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING ALLIED WORLD’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION MARTIN GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Shortly after the Plaintiffs1 filed the Complaint that initiated this adversary proceeding, the Bermuda Insurers2 asked this Court to compel arbitration of the insura
Global Health Council v. Donald J. Trumppublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AIDS VACCINE ADVOCACY COALITION, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-00400 (AHA) v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al., Defendants. GLOBAL HEALTH COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action N
Inguran, LLC v. Abs Global, Inc.public domain
Case: 22-1385 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 07/05/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INGURAN, LLC, DBA STGENETICS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ABS GLOBAL, INC., GENUS PLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2022-1385 ______________________ Appeal from the United St
Third Eye, Inc. v. UST Global Inc.public domain
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed May 4, 2023 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00334-CV THIRD EYE, INC., Appellant V. UST GLOBAL INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Cornejo v. Dakota Lines, Inc.public domain
2023 IL App (1st) 220633 No. 1-22-0633 Opinion filed September 27, 2023 Third Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS