⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Global Container Lines Limited”

District Court, S.D. New York · 1994-11-16 · Published · cited 23× · 868 F. Supp. 599; 1995 A.M.C. 1266; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16360; 1994 WL 651918
868 F.Supp. 599 (1994) ROYAL SWAN NAVIGATION COMPANY LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. GLOBAL CONTAINER LINES, LTD., Defendant. No. 94 Civ. 7129 (HB). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 16, 1994. *600 Todd P. Kenyon and William N. France, Healy & Baillie, New York City, for plaintiff. Peter G. Drakos and Christ
District Court, N.D. California · 2004-12-07 · Published · cited 9× · 347 F. Supp. 2d 749; 2005 A.M.C. 305; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24585; 2004 WL 2806309
347 F.Supp.2d 749 (2004) AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY; AIU Company, Plaintiffs, v. TGL CONTAINER LINES, LTD.; Trans Global Logistics(S) Pte Ltd.; Hanjin Shipping Company Ltd.; M/V Hanjin Pennsylvania, Defendants. TGL Container Lines, Ltd.; Trans Global Logistics(S) Pte Ltd., Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. The Hanjin Pennsylvania; Hanjin Shipping Company Ltd., Third-Party Defendants. No. C 03-5190MHP.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001-11-14 · Published · cited 0× · 22 F. App'x 9
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. After full review of the case, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(b). Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decis
District Court, N.D. California · 2012-12-19 · Published · cited 3× · 913 F. Supp. 2d 780; 2012 WL 6631713; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179672
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Now pending before the Court is the motion of Defendant American Global Logistics, LLC (“Defendant” or “AGL”) for partial summary judgment against Plaintiff Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (“Plaintiff’ or “MOL”). ECF No. 123 (“Mot.”).1 The motion is ful
District Court, N.D. California · 2012-05-10 · Published · cited 6× · 871 F. Supp. 2d 933; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65826; 2012 WL 1657108
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO PARTIALLY DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Now before the Court are two motions to partially dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 72 (“SAC”), of Plaintiff Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd. (“MOL”), a Japanese corporation. Specifically, the motions seek dismissal of the SAC’s fourth and fifth claim
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023-08-03 · Published · cited 1× · 76 F.4th 372
Case: 22-20274 Document: 00516844626 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 11× · 248 F. Supp. 3d 487; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50405
*490OPINION & ORDER NELSON S. ROMÁN, United States District Judge Plaintiff Global Packaging Services, LLC (“Plaintiff”), a packaging company incorporated in Florida, brings claims for breach of contract and tortious interference against Global Printing and Packaging (“Defendant”), a printing solutions company incorporated in Massachusetts, arisin
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017-01-12 · Published · cited 1× · 562 B.R. 55; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 84
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE On December 21, 2016, this Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Temporary Restraining Order (the “TRO Opinion” or the “TRO,” ECF Doc. # 35),1 enjoining the Bermuda Insurers from taking any action to enforce certain provisions of the Injunc-tive Orders (defined below) issued by the Su
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2024-09-17 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Rendered in Part and Memorandum Opinion filed September 17, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00356-CV HTS SERVICES INC., Appellant V. AINUL ABEDIN AND PACKWELL CONTAINER LINE INC., Appellees On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris Cou
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2019-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed December 10, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00052-CV SUMMIT GLOBAL CONTRACTORS, INC., Appellant V. ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND ENBRIDGE GATHERING (NORTH TEXAS) L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 215th District Court
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017-01-31 · Published · cited 6× · 562 B.R. 866; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 251; 63 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 171
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER FINDING THAT THE BERMUDA INSURERS VIOLATED THE BARTON DOCTRINE MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE This is the fourth written opinion in this adversary proceeding since it was filed on October 27, 2016, with each of the opinions addressing whether this Court or a court in Bermuda can and will address the claims and defenses arising in this case, including whether the
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019-02-20 · Published · cited 12× · 368 F. Supp. 3d 1112
On September 7, 2018, Radiant filed a six-count Verified Complaint ("Complaint") against Charles "Chad" Furstenau, Jr., and BTX Air Express of Detroit, a Connecticut limited liability company ("BTX Detroit"), alleging the following claims: Count I - Declaratory Judgment (Against Furstenau); Count II - Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Against Furstenau); Count III - Misa
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-07-05 · Published · cited 4× · 72 F.4th 1272
Case: 22-1385 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 07/05/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INGURAN, LLC, DBA STGENETICS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ABS GLOBAL, INC., GENUS PLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2022-1385 ______________________ Appeal from the United St
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2020-01-27 · Published · cited 0×
Reverse and Render; Opinion Filed January 27, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00183-CV SANTOS NAVARRO ROSALES, Appellant V. LONE STAR CORRUGATED CONTAINER CORPORATION, Appellee On Appeal from the 95th District Court
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014-09-04 · Published · cited 6× · 515 B.R. 193; 2014 WL 4375687
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LIFTING AUTOMATIC STAY TO PERMIT PAYMENTS OF DEFENSE COSTS UNDER CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Once again, former MF Global directors and officers (the “Individual Insureds”1) *196ask the Court for relief so they can access proceeds of cer
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017-08-24 · Published · cited 13× · 571 B.R. 80; 2017 Bankr. LEXIS 2379
*83MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING ALLIED WORLD’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION MARTIN GLENN, United States Bankruptcy Judge Shortly after the Plaintiffs1 filed the Complaint that initiated this adversary proceeding, the Bermuda Insurers2 asked this Court to compel arbitration of the insura
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AIDS VACCINE ADVOCACY COALITION, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-00400 (AHA) v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, et al., Defendants. GLOBAL HEALTH COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action N
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023-07-05 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 22-1385 Document: 44 Page: 1 Filed: 07/05/2023 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INGURAN, LLC, DBA STGENETICS, Plaintiff-Appellant v. ABS GLOBAL, INC., GENUS PLC, Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2022-1385 ______________________ Appeal from the United St
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2023-05-04 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRMED and Opinion Filed May 4, 2023 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-22-00334-CV THIRD EYE, INC., Appellant V. UST GLOBAL INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-09-27 · Published · cited 3× · 2023 IL App (1st) 220633
2023 IL App (1st) 220633 No. 1-22-0633 Opinion filed September 27, 2023 Third Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS