Cases

11/02/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON September 7, 2022 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GLENN SEWELL Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 12-03950 Jennifer Johnson Mitchell, Judge ___________________________________

*223REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. ¶ 1. We review a published opinion of the court of appeals,1 which determined that use of a deceased police officer's recorded statements at a suppression hearing2 did not violate Glenn T. Zamzow's rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment or the Due Process Clause o

2017 WI 29 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP2603-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Glenn T. Zamzow, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 3

728 F.Supp.2d 768 (2010) COMMONWEALTH of Virginia ex rel. Kenneth T. CUCCINELLI, II, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Virginia, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, in her official capacity, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:10CV188-HEH. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. December 13,

114 F.Supp. 445 (1953) BATES et ux. v. GLENN, Collector of Internal Revenue. No. 2480. United States District Court W. D. Kentucky, at Louisville. September 14, 1953. E. J. Wells, Louisville, Ky., for plaintiffs. H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew D. Sharpe, Henry L. Spencer, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., and Charles F. Wood, Asst. U. S. Atty., Louisv

345 F.3d 1182 Jon F. KIDNEIGH, Plaintiff/Cross-Appellee, andBarbara Kidneigh, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee,v.UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Maine Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, Amicus Curiae. No. 02-1277. No. 02-1282. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

TACHA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff King of the Mountain Sports, Inc. (“KOM”) filed suit against defendants alleging that they infringed its trademark and violated the Federal Anti-Dilution Act and Colorado Consumer Protection Act. The district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all claims. KOM appealed only the disposition of its trademark infringement claim

DUNN, Justice. This is an appeal by the State from an order of the trial court suppressing certain evidence in a prosecution for second-degree murder and manslaughter. We affirm in part and reverse in part. During the early morning hours of July 23, 1981, twenty-three-month old Joseph Lange (Joseph) was taken to the emergency room of an Aberdeen, South Dakota, hospital by David Holland (defendant). After

Opinion by Judge J. JONES. Appellees, L & R Exploration Venture and its trustees (together, L & R Venture), domesticated a foreign judgment against appellant, Jack Grynberg, in Colorado district court under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act (the Uniform Act), sections 183-53-101 to -108, C.R.S.2010. Mr. Grynberg appeals the district court's order denying his C.R.C.P. 60(b) motion for reli

*1195 HENRY, Circuit Judge. Dee and Don Hollander filed this products liability action in the District Court for Oklahoma County alleging that Parlo-del, a drug manufactured by Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Sandoz”), now known as Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, and distributed by HCA Healt

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge: This consolidated appeal arises from a contract dispute between Douglas Asphalt Company, including its principals Joel and Kyle Spivey, and the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT). GDOT awarded Douglas two paving contracts to mill and resurface certain stretches of interstate highway in Georgia. After the first project was completed, GDOT began noticing that the asphalt that Douglas had laid

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 94-DP-00761-SCT BOBBY GLENN WILCHER v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/21/94 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARCUS D. GORDON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: BILL T. MAY ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

694 A.2d 422 (1997) Alan Russell KAHN, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. TREMONT CORPORATION, Susan E. Alderton, Richard J. Boushka, J. Landis Martin, Glenn R. Simmons, Harold C. Simmons, Michael A. Snetzer, Thomas P. Stafford, Avy H. Stein, and Valhi, Inc., Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 170, 1996. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: February 27, 1997. Decide

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Kevin Harris brought a Bivens1 action against thirteen named federal law enforcement agents, as well as several unnamed individuals and the United States for then-actions at Ruby Ridge, Idaho during two days in August 1992. The individual defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, in part on the basis of qualified immunity. The district court granted the motion to dism

968 F.Supp. 568 (1997) KING OF THE MOUNTAIN SPORTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation; Eclipse Television and Sports Marketing LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company; Eclipse Television and Sports Marketing, Inc., a California Corporation; Bogner of America, Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Henry Schneidman, an individual; and Mark Schelde, an individual, Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-B-250.<

945 A.2d 1123 (2008) In the Matter of the PHILADELPHIA STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. Nos. 613, 2007, 615, 2007. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: March 12, 2008. Decided: March 27, 2008. Robert J. Valihura, Jr., Esquire (argued), The Law Office of Robert J. Valihura, Jr., Wilmington, Delaware; for Objectors Below-Appellants Richard P. Kahn, Tim Lobach, Eugene Sa

585 F.3d 1356 (2009) Barbara SCRUGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXXONMOBIL PENSION PLAN and ExxonMobil Savings Plan, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-6145. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. November 9, 2009. *1358 Babette Patton, Breathwit & Patton, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, for Appellant. Michael S. Beaver (Cath

COLEMAN, Justice, dissenting: ¶ 19. My disagreement with my colleagues in the majority lies in the legal significance of four words spoken by the defendant, “I could use him.” The majority holds that, when the defendant spoke the words, she invoked her right to counsel, at which point the investigator was required to cease questioning. I agree that interrogation must stop the moment a suspect invokes the right t

STEWART, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from the district court’s judgment awarding the taxpayer a refund of income taxes which the court found to have been erroneously and illegally collected. There is no dispute about the facts. In 1948 a Ford dealer advertised in the Louisville newspapers that the 1949 For

ACCEPTED 03-14-00197-CV 4929353 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEX