⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Glenn D Naylor and Deborah I Naylor”

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005-08-17 · Published · cited 0× · 418 F.3d 393; 2005 WL 1903831
PUBLISHED Filed: August 9, 2005 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA ANDERSON,  Plaintiff-Appellant, and SHERMAN T. LOTT; VERNELLE PAYTON; LARRY COLEMAN; AVA HAWKINS; CURTIS YOUNG; CLINTON EDWARDS, JR.; FRANCIS H. NEWMAN, JR.; SAMUEL QUILLER; PAMELA WADE; BENNIE BREELAND; GLENN STEPHENSON; KENNETH L. BRADY, SR.; CLYDE REED; ROBIN
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Groseclose v. Bellpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1995-07-28 · Published · cited 8× · 895 F. Supp. 935; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18174; 1995 WL 461578
895 F.Supp. 935 (1995) William E. GROSECLOSE v. Ricky BELL, Warden. No. 3:89-0662. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. July 28, 1995. *936 Larry D. Woods, Woods & Woods, Nashville, TN, for petitioner. Glenn Richard Pruden, Nashville, TN, for respondent. MEMORANDUM
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992-04-10 · Published · cited 18× · 598 So. 2d 1177
598 So.2d 1177 (1992) LIVINGSTON PARISH POLICE JURY v. ACADIANA SHIPYARDS, INC., et al. Glynn McCRORY, et al. v. Earl G. DUBOSE, et al. Joe C. DEAN, et al. v. Earl G. DUBOSE, et al. Ernest BOONE, et al. v. Earl G. DUBOSE, et al. Susan CAMPO, et al. v. Earl G. DUBOSE, et al. Earl S. ADAMSON, et al. v. ACADIANA SHIPYARD, et al. Edward E. RICHARDSON, III v. ACADIANA SHIPYARD, et
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2015-05-07 · Published · cited 0× · 2015 Ark. 200
Cite as 2015 Ark. 200 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS IN RE SUSPENSIONS OF Opinion Delivered May 7, 2015 ATTORNEYS WHO FAILED TO PAY ANNUAL ATTORNEY-LICENSE FEE PER CURIAM On May 14, 2014, we held unconstitutional former Rule VII(C) of the Rules Governing Admission to the Bar to the extent the former rule provided for the suspension of attorneys
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005-05-04 · Published · cited 224× · 406 F.3d 248; 67 Fed. R. Serv. 185; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7697; 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,940; 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1121; 2005 WL 1027356
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT VIRGINIA ANDERSON,  Plaintiff-Appellant, and SHERMAN T. LOTT; VERNELLE PAYTON; LARRY COLEMAN; AVA HAWKINS; CURTIS YOUNG; CLINTON EDWARDS, JR.; FRANCIS H. NEWMAN, JR.; SAMUEL QUILLER; PAMELA WADE; BENNIE BREELAND; GLENN STEPHENSON; KENNETH L. BRADY, SR.; CLYDE REED; ROBIN HOLMAN; JOHN L. NAYLOR; GWENDOLYN H. WATTS; ALTON BARNES; HAYWARD
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992-04-10 · Published · cited 15× · 598 So. 2d 1177
LANIER, Judge, concurring. I concur in the result reached. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in certifying the class. I do not agree that the manifest error rule can be used to review the discretionary ruling of the trial court to certify the class. Ellis v. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, 550 So.2d at 1325-1326.
District Court, E.D. New York · 2002-09-19 · Published · cited 16× · 211 F.R.D. 86; 2002 WL 32155895; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19647
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. 1. Introduction This memorandum and order addresses plaintiffs’ application for class certification. See Third Amended Class Action Complaint and Supplemental Memorandum in Support Amended and Renewed Motion for Class Certification, dated July 26, 2002. Extensive briefing and argument by the parties on the issue have been con