Cases

216 B.R. 220 (1997) In re Glenda PERKINS, Debtor. Glenda PERKINS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 96-12015, Adversary No. 96-1104. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. October 10, 1997. *221 Roger O. Reyes, Cincinnati, OH, for Plaintiff. Terra Serena, S

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 21, 2011 Session VICTOR W. ISAAC, M.D. v. THE CENTER FOR SPINE, JOINT, AND NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION, P.C. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 09-81-IV Russell T. Perkins, Chancellor No. M2010-01333-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 1, 2011 In this employment contract dispute,

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. # 57. Plaintiffs assert that Defendants' failure to provide all class members with notice of the one-year asylum application deadline and failure to create and implement procedural mechanisms that guarantee class members the opportunity to timely

*276ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM.* | j This disciplinary matter arises from formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible to practice.1 FORMAL

ROBIN F. WYNNE, Associate Justice Michael James Friday appeals from his convictions for two counts of rape for which he was sentenced to life plus forty years' imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. Appellant raises the following points on appeal: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support either conviction; (2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion in limine seeking to preclude reference to t

283 A.2d 660 (1971) MAINE NATIONAL BANK et al. v. Florence C. PETRLIK et al. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. November 12, 1971. *661 Drummond, Wescott & Woodsum, by Theodore H. Kurtz, Portland, for Maine Nat. Bank. *662 Preti & Flaherty, by Arthur A. Peabody, Portland, for Robert F. Preti.

527 S.E.2d 55 (2000) Glenda L. SHUMAKER, Plaintiff, v. George R. SHUMAKER, Defendant. No. COA99-197. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. March 21, 2000. Wilson, Biesecker, Tripp & Sink, by Max R. Rodden, Lexington, for plaintiff-appellee. Metcalf & Beal, L.L.P., by Christopher L. Beal, Winston-Salem, for defendant-appellant.

177 F.3d 714 Kenneth Ray LEE; Lisa Jeanne Ertle; Brenda Osen; JuanMartinez; Amy Schwandt; Glenda Richards; MichaelO'Donnell; John Kant; Kim Swanson, on behalf of themselvesand all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,Thomas J. Lyons & Associates, Appellant,v.L.B. SALES, INC., doing business as Continental Motors, aMinnesota corporation, Defendant,Credit Acceptance Corporation, a Michigan corporation,

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 27, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00095-CV SAN JACINTO RIVER AUTHORITY, Appellant V. ANDY RAY, ET AL., Appellees1 On Appeal from the 125th District Court H

ORDER DENYING STAND UP FOR CALIFORNIA!'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 29) ORDER GRANTING NORTH FORK'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 36) ORDER GRANTING THE UNITED STATES' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 40) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY (Doc. 28) ANTH

686 N.E.2d 89 (1997) Randy G. STAHL, Appellant (Defendant below), v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below). No. 43S03-9709-CR-511. Supreme Court of Indiana. September 24, 1997. *90 Michael W. Reed, Warsaw, for Appellant. Pamela Carter, Attorney General, Randi F. Elfenbaum, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, for

Kantrowitz, J. Was it reasonable for the police to believe that 38 Cabot Street in Salem was a single-family house, as opposed to a multi-unit dwelling? If so, the warrant to search the house was valid, despite the police officers’ discovery of a second unit within. If not, the warrant was invalid on lack of particularity grounds, and the motion to suppress should have been allowed. We hold that the belief was reasonable and tha

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-CA-00438-COA IN RE THE ESTATE OF NEWELL GENE APPELLANTS WARREN, DECEASED: GLADYS P. WARREN AND TERRY WARREN v. SHERRY MAHARREY APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/27/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. VICKI B. DANIELS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED:

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-3010 ___________ Kenneth Ray Lee; Lisa Jeanne Ertle; * Brenda Osen; Juan Martinez; Amy * Schwandt; Glenda Richards; Michael * O’Donnell; John Kant; Kim Swanson, * on behalf of themselves and all others * similarly situated, * * Plaintiffs,

Opinion issued March 10, 2005 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ________

Judicial Merit Selection Commission Sen. Luke A. Rankin, Chairman Erin B. Crawford, Chief Counsel Sen. Ronnie A. Sabb Emma Dean, Counsel Sen. Scott Talley Rep. J. Todd Rutherford Rep. Jeffrey E. “Jeff” Johnson Rep. Micajah P. “Micah” Caskey, IV Hope Blackley Lucy Grey McIver Andrew N. Safran J.P. “Pete” Strom Jr.

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS April 11, 2014 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court VICKIE SCHMIDT PARSON; PATRICIA SCALES;

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT Michael W. Reed Warsaw, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Pamela Carter Attorney General of Indiana Randi F. Elfenbaum Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

ORDER SCHLESINGER, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint for Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive and Declaratory Relief (Doc. No. 1, filed October 19.2004) and Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion for Preliminary Injunction and for Expedited Hearing (Doc. No. 3, filed October 20, 2004). Defendants Scheu and Carlberg have filed a Response to Plaintiffs’ Emergency Motion

CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi