Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
15 opinions for “Giselle L. Holland”
Jimmie Holland v. State of Arkansaspublic domain
Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 594 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CR-22-616 Opinion Delivered December 13, 2023 JIMMIE HOLLAND APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 72CR-16
Martin v. Statepublic domain
THOMAS, J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent, because the State submitted competent evidence from which a rational trier of fact could reject Appellant’s self-serving testimony that he did not possess the cocaine with intent to sell. See Twilegar v. State, 42 So.3d 177, 188-89 (Fla.2010) (noting that in circumstantial-evidence case, state produced competent evidence to support conclusion that ration
Laidler v. Statepublic domain
69 So.3d 1008 (2011) Euriell LAIDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 1D10-2053. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. September 13, 2011. Sheila Callahan, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. P
Valadez v. CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc.public domain
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiffs Miguel Valadez, Nora Ledesma, Manuel Ledesma, Anthony Green, Jr., *1258and Eleaquin Temblador ("Plaintiffs") moved for partial summary judgment on their employment status in this wage and hour case. Defendant CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. ("Defendant") moved to strike or dismi
State v. Wrightpublic domain
PARIENTE, J. We have for review the opinion in Wright v. State, 738 So.2d 357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), which certified conflict with the opinions in State v. Hayes, 720 So.2d 1095 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), quashed, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999), and State v. Baxley, 684 So.2d 831 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. In its brief, the St
In re HTC Corp.public domain
Prost, Chief Judge. ORDER HTC Corporation petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the District of Delaware to (a) vacate its December 18, 2017 order denying-in-part HTC Corporation's motion to dismiss for improper venue under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) ; and (b) dismiss the complaint against HTC Corporation. 3G Licensing, S.A., Orange S.A., and
Avmed Inc. v. Browngreer PLCpublic domain
PER CURIAM: * Before this court is an appeal of the district court’s denial of two motions for *263preliminary injunctive relief arising out of the Vioxx Multidistrict Litigation. The plaintiff-appellants are a group of non-governmental, self-funded, ERISA health benefit providers. The appellants seek to enjoin distribution of interim paym
West v. DJ Mortgage, LLCpublic domain
ORDER Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge ■ In this'lawsuit, Plaintiff Kayla West, a former tenant at one of Defendant DJ Mortgage, LLC’s (“DJ Mortgage”) properties, claims that Defendant’s property manager sexually assaulted and harassed her over several months. She sued DJ Mortgage under the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (“FHA”) as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et
Rivera v. Centro Medico De Turabo, Inc.public domain
575 F.3d 10 (2009) Florentino RIVERA, Carmen De León Rivera, Conjugal Partnership Rivera-De León, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. CENTRO MÉDICO DE TURABO, INC., d/b/a Hima San Pablo Caguas, Defendant, Appellee, *11 Dr. Marcial Walker; Jane Doe; Conjugal Partnership Walker-Doe; Dr. Lydia Díaz-Borrás; John Doe; Conjugal Partnership Doe-Díaz; Companies A-Z; John Richard Poe; Peter Moe, Defendants. <
Freeman v. Dal-Tile Corp.public domain
ORDER W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the 30 May 2012 motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Dal-Tile Corporation (“Dal-Tile”). (DE # 60.) The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition. I. BACKGROUND1 Dal-Tile, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mohawk ESV, Inc., manufactur
In Re: Htc Corporationpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ In re: HTC CORPORATION, Petitioner ______________________ 2018-130 ______________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:17-cv-00083-LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark. ______________________ YAR ROMAN CH
Delaventura v. Columbia Acorn Trustpublic domain
417 F.Supp.2d 147 (2006) Dean DELAVENTURA, on behalf of Himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. COLUMBIA ACORN TRUST; Columbia Funds Trusts I-IX, Defendants. No. CIV.A.05-10793 WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 1, 2006. John C. Martland, Martland & Brooks LIT, Saugus, MA, David Pastor, Gilman and Pastor, LLP, Boston,
Terrance Reece v. State of Tennesseepublic domain
06/11/2024 THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 23, 2024 Session TERRANCE REECE1 v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 121854 Steven W. Sword, Judge No. E2023-00305-CCA-
Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Abshirepublic domain
OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti
RamiroAviles v. S&P Global, Inc.public domain
J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge *246In these five related cases, one of which is a putative derivative and class action, a collective total of over 500 offshore investors ("Plaintiffs") who acquired shares in the Lifetrade Fund, B.V. ("Lifetrade") and two related funds (collectively, the "Lifetrade Funds") seek relief for the evaporation of their investmen