⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Giroux v. Shaw”

Altman v. Shawpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-06-18 · Published · cited 10× · 184 A.D.3d 995; 126 N.Y.S.3d 526; 2020 NY Slip Op 3446
Altman v Shaw (2020 NY Slip Op 03446) Altman v Shaw 2020 NY Slip Op 03446 Decided on June 18, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</
Saucer v. Girouxpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1921-10-29 · Published · cited 18× · 202 P. 887; 54 Cal. App. 732; 1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 679
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon an order of court sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint. The action is based upon the alleged act of defendant in causing to be published in a newspaper false and libelous statements that the deceased adult brother of plaintiff Virginia Saucer was an illegitimate son of her deceased mother, which false statements, it is alleged, have caused plaintiff grievous mental and physical suffering, for which she aske
Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997-04-28 · Published · cited 3× · 693 A.2d 1025; 1997 R.I. LEXIS 138; 1997 WL 250051
693 A.2d 1025 (1997) Louis DiGIOVANNI v. SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS, INC. No. 96-89-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. April 28, 1997. Joshua Pearlman, Pawtucket. Charles N. Redihan, Jr., Cumberland. ORDER This case came before the court for oral argument April 11, 1997, pursuant to an order that had directed both parties to appear in order to show
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009-07-14 · Published · cited 22× · 775 N.W.2d 326; 285 Mich. App. 51
775 N.W.2d 326 (2009) LEE v. DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER. Docket No. 282268. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted March 10, 2009, at Detroit. Decided July 14, 2009, at 9:10 a.m. *328 Fieger, Fieger, Kenney, Johnson & Giroux, P.C. (by Geoffrey N. Fieger, Lloyd G. Johnson, and Heather A. Jefferson), Southfield, f
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024-11-27 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 NY Slip Op 05928
Williams v Ithaca Dispatch, Inc. (2024 NY Slip Op 05928) Williams v Ithaca Dispatch, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 05928 Decided on November 27, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J
Michigan Supreme Court · 2016-06-06 · Published · cited 56× · 499 Mich. 211; 884 N.W.2d 238; 2016 Mich. LEXIS 1094
MARKMAN, J. (concurring). At issue here is the subject-matter jurisdiction of the district court, which is exclusive in “civil actions when the amount in controversy does not exceed $25,000.00.” MCL 600.8301(1). I join the majority because I agree that “amount in controversy” as used in MCL 600.8301(1) refers to the “prayer for relief set forth in the plaintiffs pleadings . ...” I further agree that a trial court may be ousted
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2017-11-02 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-IA-01829-SCT GRACELAND CARE CENTER OF NEW ALBANY, LLC, ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC., KAREN CLAYTON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF GRACELAND CARE CENTER OF NEW ALBANY, W. LARRY OVERSTREET AND SHARON WINDHAM v. TERESA HAMLET, ON BEHALF OF JIMMY KINARD, DECEASED ON MOTION FOR REHEARING DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/17/2015 TRIAL JUDGE
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2017-08-25 · Published · cited 1× · 236 So. 3d 1
KING, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶ 1. The motion for rehearing is denied. The original opinions are withdrawn, and these opinions are substituted therefor. ¶ 2. Teresa Hamlet filed a motion for an extension of time to serve process, prior to the expiration of the 120-day deadline provided by Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 4(h). The trial judge granted the motion and signed an order, yet the orde
State v. Williamspublic domain
South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008-04-09 · Published · cited 6× · 2008 SD 29; 748 N.W.2d 435; 2008 S.D. LEXIS 29; 2008 WL 1699805
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 437 [¶ 1.] Judy Lyn Williams was convicted of Grand Theft for embezzlement from the Veterans of Foreign Wars Post (VFW) in Brandon, South Dakota. Williams appeals. We affirm. FACTS [¶ 2.] The State charged Williams with grand theft, claiming she converted VFW funds for h
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 570 F.3d 698; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 14238; 2009 WL 1872284
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 09a0223p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - JEFFREY MICHAEL MOLDOWAN, -
Brown v. Corsinipublic domain
District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009-09-29 · Published · cited 7× · 657 F. Supp. 2d 296; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91478; 2009 WL 3088963
657 F.Supp.2d 296 (2009) Charles BROWN and Ramadan Shabazz, Plaintiffs v. Michael CORSINI, Wayne Whisler, Jeffrey Fallon, Sean Maderios, Kevin Kennedy, and Kristie Ladouceur, Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-11663-RCL. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 29, 2009. *298 David J. Rentsch, Commonwealth of Massac
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009-07-23 · Published · cited 4× · 573 F.3d 309; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 17988; 2009 WL 2176640
573 F.3d 309 (2009) Jeffrey Michael MOLDOWAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF WARREN, Donald Ingles, Michael Schultz (07-2115); Alan Warnick (07-2116); Maureen Fournier (07-2117), Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 07-2115, 07-2116, 07-2117. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: January 20, 2009. Decided and Filed: July 23, 2009.
Lee v. ITT STANDARDpublic domain
District Court, W.D. New York · 2002-04-02 · Published · cited 4× · 268 F. Supp. 2d 315; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26243; 2002 WL 32087484
268 F.Supp.2d 315 (2002) James LEE, Anthony Miller, and Terry Williams, Plaintiffs, v. ITT STANDARD and United Steelworkers Local 897, Defendants. No. 98-CV-183A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. April 2, 2002. *322 Sanders & Sanders, Harvey P. Sanders, of Counsel, Amherst, for Plaintiffs. Hodgson Russ Andr
Lanman v. Hinsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-06-17 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0212p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellee, - PATRICIA LANMAN,
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2005-02-11 · Published · cited 14× · 161 S.W.3d 558; 2004 WL 2997749
161 S.W.3d 558 (2004) CITY OF LAREDO and Agustin Dovalina III, Appellants, v. David LEAL, Appellee. No. 04-03-00800-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. December 29, 2004. Rehearing Overruled February 11, 2005. *559 Deborah L. Leach, Albert Lopez, Lopez & Smith, P.C., San Antonio, for appellants. <
Lanman v. Hinsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-06-17 · Published · cited 739× · 529 F.3d 673; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12682; 2008 WL 2415926
529 F.3d 673 (2008) Patricia LANMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert HINSON, James Siegfried, Mike Morey, Linda Shaffer-Price, George White, Julie Stiver, R.N., Edwina Koehn-Koldenhof, R.N., Jean Prandine, Steven Bronsink, Defendants-Appellants. No. 06-2263. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: November 29, 2007. Decided and Filed: June 17, 2008
Shloss v. Sweeneypublic domain
District Court, N.D. California · 2007-02-09 · Published · cited 3× · 515 F. Supp. 2d 1068; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76910; 2007 WL 2924056
515 F.Supp.2d 1068 (2007) Carol L. SHLOSS, Plaintiff, v. Seán SWEENEY, et al., Defendants. No. C 06-03718 JW. United States District Court, N.D. California. February 9, 2007. *1069 *1070 *1071 Bernard A. Burk, Robert Spoo, Howard, Rice, Nemerovski, Canady,
District Court, N.D. California · 2010-02-10 · Published · cited 4× · 688 F. Supp. 2d 902; 188 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2209; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11628; 2010 WL 546679
688 F.Supp.2d 902 (2010) OPERATING ENGINEERS' PENSION TRUST FUND; Gil Crosthwaite and Russ Burns, as Trustees, Plaintiffs, v. CLARK'S WELDING AND MACHINE, a California partnership, aka Clark's Welding, aka Clark's Welding and Machining; Sylvester Haberman, Individually, and Franz Edelmayer, individually, Defendants. Case No. 09-0044 SC. United States District Court, N.D. California.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2004-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
OPINION No. 04-03-00800-CV CITY OF LAREDO and Agustin Dovalina III, Appellants v. David LEAL, Appellee From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2001-02-14 · Published · cited 1× · 12 Mass. L. Rptr. 655
Agnes, A.J. The plaintiff is a coach of a girls’ softball team which plays in a league organized and administered by the defendant Youth Sports Association Purchasing Group (hereafter, “Association”). The plaintiff alleges that he was injured as a result of the Association’s negligence during a softball game in which the coaches participated as players. The Association has filed a motion for summary judgment in which it maintai