Cases

17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN

CHIN, J., Concurring. — I agree that the trial court committed error in the course of ruling on the class certification motion of named plaintiffs Maria Ayala, Josefina Briseño, Rosa Duran, and Osman Núñez, that remand for further consideration of the motion is necessary, and that affirmance of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is appropriate. The record indicates that the trial court did not adequately consider the extent to whi

(2008) Donald R. DUDLEY, D.C. d/b/a HealthSource Chiropractic, Plaintiff, v. HEALTHSOURCE CHIROPRACTIC, INC. and Stephen T. Divito, D.C., Defendants. No. 07-CV-6631. United States District Court, W.D. New York. September 30, 2008. DECISION AND ORDER MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Donald R. D

558 F.3d 751 (2009) IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, Wilderness Watch; Sierra Club Northstar Chapter; Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. Abigail KIMBELL, Chief of the United States Forest Service; Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture, Defendants-Appellees, Conservationists With Common Sense; Cook County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Minnesota; Arrowhead Coalition

273 F.Supp.2d 1095 (2003) GLOW INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. Jennifer LOPEZ, Coty, Inc., a corporation, Sweetface Fashion Company, LLC, Jennifer Lopez Enterprises, inclusive, Defendants. No. CV 02-06167 MMM PJW. United States District Court, C.D. California. July 23, 2003. *1096 *1097 Kennet

Hoddinott, J. Plaintiff Sheet Metal Employers Association, Inc., is a trade association of sheet metal contractors in the Cleveland metropolitan area extending over four counties. One of its members is Plaintiff Franck & Fric, Inc. This suit involves a bid depository, something new in the construction industry. Similar organizations have operated in several other cities for a few years.

232 F.Supp.2d 1092 (2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMC ENTERTAINMENT, INC., American Multi-Cinema, Inc. Defendants. No. CV 99-01034 FMC(SHX). United States District Court, C.D. California. November 20, 2002. *1093 Leon W. Weidman, Michele C. Marchand, Suzanne L. Bell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of U.S. Attorney Civil

570 F.Supp. 708 (1983) Louis M. D'ANTUONO v. CCH COMPUTAX SYSTEMS, INC. Civ. A. No. 83-0447S. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. September 19, 1983. *709 Everett A. Petronio and Thomas M. Petronio, Johnston, R.I., for plaintiff. Edwards & Angell by Wm. P. Robinson, III, Patricia A.S. Zesk, Providence, R.I.,

391 F.Supp. 841 (1975) RELCO, INC. and Thomas H. Doss, Plaintiffs, v. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 74-H-362. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division. March 24, 1975. *842 James E. Knox and Morris E. Belilove, Houston, Tex., for plaintiffs. Edward B. McDonough, Jr.,

80 N.J. 6 (1976) 364 A.2d 1016 THE TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION OF WEYMOUTH TOWNSHIP, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WEYMOUTH TOWNSHIP, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND SIDNEY SIMON T/A WEYMOUTH PARK ASSOCIATION, AND M & M LAND CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.[*] The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued February

The opinion of the court was delivered by Pashman, J. This appeal raises the question whether a zoning ordinance may create a district in which one of the permitted uses is a mobile home park for the exclusive use of the elderly. The Appellate Division disagreed with the determination of the Law Division that such zoning is valid. Because this pattern of zoning developed in a rather roundabout way, it is helpfu

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TIMOTHY J. HARRIS, on behalf of ) himself and derivatively on behalf of ) Harris FRC Corporation and The Mary ) Ellen Harris 2011 Grantor Retained ) Annuity Trust, ) ) Petitioner/Plaintiff, ) ) and )

310 B.R. 514 (2004) In re Carolyn M. WILE, aka Carolyn M.J. Wile, Debtor. Carolyn M. Wile, William C. Miller, Chapter 13 Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. Household Bank, F.S.B., Decision One Mortgage Company, Viking Mortgage Services, Inc., Defendants. Carolyn M. Wile, William C. Miller, Chapter 13 Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. Conseco Finance Consumer Discount Company, Accelerated Mortgage Co., American Home Concepts, Inc., Defendants.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges AtLee, Ortiz and Lorish PUBLISHED Argued at Richmond, Virginia ANNE EDWARDS HARTLEY, ET AL. OPINION BY v. Record No. 1298-22-2 JUDGE DANIEL E. ORTIZ FEBRUARY 13,

422 F.Supp.2d 1079 (2005) Armando Marquez FRIEND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TIME MANUFACTURING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. CV 03-343-TUC-CKJ. United States District Court, D. Arizona. October 7, 2005. Patrick Earl Broom, Haralson Miller Pitt Feldman & McAnally PLC, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiffs. James K. Kloss, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Phoe

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

Johnson & Morris PLLC v. Abdelbaky & Boes, PLLC, 2016 NCBC 76. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF WAKE 16 CVS 6151 JOHNSON & MORRIS PLLC, d/b/a ) CAROLINA PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

JEFFREY S. WHITE, United States District Judge Now before the Court are cross-motions for judgment by Plaintiff Bruce Filarsky and Defendant Life Insurance Company of North America ("LINA"). Having reviewed the administrative record and the parties' arguments, and based on the Court's findings of fact, the Court concludes LINA wrongfully determined Dr.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 07-3689/07-3696/08-1167 ___________ Izaak Walton League of America, Inc., * * Plaintiff, * * Wilderness Watch; Sierra Club * Northstar Chapter; Northeastern * Minnesotans fo

200 F.Supp.2d 207 (2002) Douglas W. MANZ, Plaintiff, v. Robert J. GAFFNEY, in his professional capacity, County of Suffolk, John B. Wingate, Commissioner, Suffolk County Department of Social Services, in his individual and professional capacity, Defendants. No. CV 99-8442. United States District Court, E.D. New York. May 6, 2002. *208</