Cases

578 N.E.2d 729 (1991) In the matter of the Commitment of GPH, Appellant-Respondent, v. David GILES, M.D., Appellee-Petitioner. No. 49A05-9101-CV-19. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fifth District. September 24, 1991. Rehearing Denied November 12, 1991. *730 Winston R. Hay, Hay and Oakes, Indianapolis, for appellant-

OPINION CHAGARES, Circuit Judge. Wardell Leroy Giles appeals the District Court’s denial of his motion to substitute Gary Campbell’s estate as a defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a). For the reasons that follow, we will vacate the District Court’s order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

The Coukt gave the instruction as prayed by Mr. Mason. Kilty, C. J., absent. Mr. Key had leave to amend on continuance and costs. Mr. Key afterwards obtained a rule to show cause why the costs of this term should not await the issue of the cause, on the ground of the misdirection of the court. Mr. Key. There are two kinds of

THE COURT, however, remained of the same opinion, after consulting the following authorities: Seward v. Baker, 1 Term R. 616; Esp. N. P. 130; Weston v. Downes, Doug. 24; Towers v. Barrett, 1 Term R. 134; Toussant v. Martinnant, 2 Term R. 104: Esp. N. P. 138; Anon., 1 Ld. Raym. 735; Hockin v. Cooke, 4 Term R. 314; Bull. N. P. 145; Churchill v. Wilkins, 1 Term R. 449; Esp. N. P. 140; Cutter v. Powell, 6 Term R. 320; Duncomb v. Tic

IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE PAOLA CANAS, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. BAY ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, et al., Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 20-0127 FILED 8-26-2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2018-052190, CV2020-002264

GÓMEZ, Chief United States District Judge ORDER (June 14, 2013) Before the Court are the motions by Barbara Walters and Judith Kromenhoek to substitute deceased defendant Alfred Felice with his personal representative or successor in interest in Cowpet Bay West Condominium No. 27. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Barbara Walters (“Walte

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SLIDEWATERS LLC, No. 20-35634 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:20-cv-00210- TOR WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES; JAY ROBERT INSLEE, Governor, in his OPINION official capacity, De

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 21–0696 Submitted February 21, 2023—Filed March 24, 2023 LS POWER MIDCONTINENT, LLC and SOUTHWEST TRANSMISSION, LLC, Appellants, vs. STATE OF IOWA, IOWA UTILITIES BOARD, GERI D. HUSER, GLEN DICKINSON, and LESLIE HICKEY, Appellees, and MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY and ITC MIDWEST LLC, Intervenor-Appellees Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Celene

44 Cal.2d 853 (1955) PACIFIC FINANCE CORPORATION (a Corporation), Respondent, v. ALVIN HARRISON FOUST et al., Appellants. L. A. No. 23273. Supreme Court of California. In Bank. July 8, 1955. William T. Selby and Glenn C. Garman for Appellants. Hugh M. Foster, Jr., Ivan C. Tagert, Mansfield A. Mills, William A. Reppy and F. Gile Tiffany, Jr., for Responde

Duffly, J. On the night of December 15, 2003, the victim, Aston Dwayne Thompson, was shot and killed as he walked to his car parked behind an apartment building. Two guns were fired at the victim, and a third was fired into the street in front of the apartment building from the rear. Of the possible assailants, only one, the defendant, was apprehended; he was found near the scene of the shooting with a gunshot wound to the leg.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. CHAMBERS., Chief Judge. Plaintiff Misty Simms brought this action for wrongful birth against the United States of America.1 The Court granted *564partial summary judgment to Plaintiff, finding that Defendant breached its duty of care but reserving the issues of causation and damage

*282 OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge: I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Mark and Anita Lipstein bring this putative class action against Defendants UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc., and United Healthcare Insurance Co. (collectively, “Defendants” or “United”) for violating the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 100

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER SULLIVAN, Justice. This case grows out of a dispute between a warehouse's owner and tenant over responsibility for maintaining the fire protection sprinkler system. Where a municipal ordinance requires an owner of commercial property to maintain a fire protection sprinkler system, can the owner shift this responsibility to a tenant by written agreement? If so, did the lease at i

61 S.W.3d 559 (2001) "Y" PROPANE SERVICE, INC., Appellant, v. Maria GARCIA, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Francisco Garcia, Deceased, Rogelio Garcia, Ubaldo Garcia, Francisco Garcia, Jr., and Maribel Garcia, Appellees. No. 04-99-00880-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. August 15, 2001. *561 Ana Lisa

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A jury rendered a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Martha Fox on claims for damages arising under Title VII and Title IX against Defendant Pittsburg State University (“PSU”), and the Court entered judgment on the verdict. The parties have now filed post-trial motions.1 The motions are fully briefed and the Cour

814 A.2d 449 (2002) 2002 ME 178 BAY VIEW BANK, N.A., v. THE HIGHLAND GOLF MORTGAGEES REALTY TRUST. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued: December 10, 2002. Decided: December 31, 2002. *450 S. James Levis, Jr. (orally), Levis & Hull, P.A., Biddeford, ME, David A. Soley, Esq. (orally), Bernstein, Shur

Opinion SIMONS, Acting P. J. In February 2003, the law firm of Wilson & Wilson (Wilson) brought an action against the City Council of Redwood City (City Council), the City of Redwood City (Redwood City), and the Redwood City Redevelopment Agency (Redevelopment Agency) (hereafter collectively the City) to challenge the approval and construction of a retail-cinema redevelopment project in Redwood City’s dow

Opinion by Judge BYBEE; Concurrence by Judge BERZON. BYBEE, Circuit Judge: Mary Kincaid-Chauncey appeals her convictions for honest services wire fraud, aiding and abetting honest services wire fraud, conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud, and Hobbs Act extortion under color of official right. Kincaid-Chauncey raises three claims of error: She claims that the district court precluded her from ca

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-10544 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-03-00500-2- MARY KINCAID-CHAUNCEY, LRH Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada

52 Mich. App. 127 (1974) 216 N.W.2d 602 MAURICIO v. TOBIAS Docket No. 14805. Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March 7, 1974. *128 Proviser & Eisenberg, P.C. (Zemke & Lustig, P.C., of counsel), for plaintiff. Rouse, Selby, Dickinson, Pike & Mourad, for defendant. Be