⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Giles v. Goodwill Ind”

District Court, D. Nevada · 2018-07-23 · Published · cited 1× · 318 F. Supp. 3d 1188
MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. SUMMARY This is a trademark infringement action between two beverage producers-Plaintiff *1193JL Beverage Company, LLC ("JL Beverage") and Defendants Beam Inc. and Jim Beam Brands Co. (collectively, "Jim Beam"). The Court held a two-day bench trial. (ECF Nos. 2
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010-09-27 · Published · cited 58× · 622 F.3d 579; 77 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 840; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19926; 2010 WL 3730921
GIBBONS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which ROGERS, J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pp. 590-91), delivered a separate concurring opinion. OPINION JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Northville Downs appeals the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings to defendants-appellees Jennifer Granholm, Governor of the State of Michigan, Michael A. Cox, Attorne
Oregon Tax Court · 2020-02-18 · Published · cited 1× · 24 Or. Tax 22
22 February 18, 2020 No. 2 IN THE OREGON TAX COURT REGULAR DIVISION T-MOBILE USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. (TC 5321) On cross-motions for summary judgment, the parties disagreed whether two of Plaintiff’s subsidiaries—one pro
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994-03-07 · Published · cited 31× · 847 F. Supp. 1261; 24 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21125; 38 ERC (BNA) 1786; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2540; 1994 WL 91236
847 F.Supp. 1261 (1994) ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Joseph M. BLOSENSKI, Jr., et al., Defendants, v. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, et al., third-party Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Environmental Resources, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Joseph M. BLOSENSKI, Jr., et al., Defendants. Civ. A. Nos. 92-2059, 93-1976.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-07-10 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) CHERYL RENEE SAID, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 15-1289 (RBW) ) NATIONAL RA
Bryant v. Gordonpublic domain
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007-04-06 · Published · cited 7× · 483 F. Supp. 2d 605; 2007 WL 461326; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12378
483 F.Supp.2d 605 (2007) Russell J. BRYANT, d/b/a Russ Bryant Photographer, Plaintiff, v. James A. GORDON, Mach 1, LLC, and John Urtis, Defendants. No. 05 C 3066. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 6, 2007. *606 *607 *608 M
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014-12-24 · Published · cited 11× · 71 F. Supp. 3d 866; 2014 WL 7366578
ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on three motions: (1) Defendants’ motion to strike Plaintiffs’ affirmative defenses to counterclaims [Docket No. 282], filed on March 17, 2014; (2) Plaintiffs’ motion for summary *874judgment [Docket No. 329], filed on July 17, 2014; and (3) Defen
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-07-10 · Published · cited 13× · 317 F. Supp. 3d 304
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge The plaintiff, Cheryl Renee Said, instituted this civil action against the defendant, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak"), alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2 to - 7 (2012) ("Title VII"), § 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, as amended,
Superior Court of Delaware · 2026-01-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STOLTZ MANAGEMENT OF ) DELAWARE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. N25C-02-367 MAA v. ) ) ENTRATA, INC., )
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014-04-25 · Published · cited 216× · 757 F.3d 1286; 94 Fed. R. Serv. 301; 110 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1695; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 7757; 2014 WL 1646435
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ APPLE INC. AND NEXT SOFTWARE, INC. (formerly known as NeXT Computer, Inc.), Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MOTOROLA, INC. (now known as Motorola Solu- tions, Inc.) AND MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Defendants-Cross Appellants. ______________________ 2012-1548, -1549 ________________
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009-02-20 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 06-10544 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  CR-03-00500-2- MARY KINCAID-CHAUNCEY, LRH Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada
District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006-03-09 · Published · cited 3× · 419 F. Supp. 2d 861; 2006 WL 587709
419 F.Supp.2d 861 (2006) WORSHAM SPRINKLER COMPANY, INC., a Virginia corporation, Plaintiff, v. WES WORSHAM FIRE PROTECTION, LLC, a Virginia corporation, and Wesley Worsham, individually, Defendants. No. Civ.A. 3:05-CV494. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia. Richmond Division. March 9, 2006. *862
Supreme Court of the United States · 1989-05-15 · Published · cited 1392× · 103 L. Ed. 2d 734; 109 S. Ct. 1443; 489 U.S. 705; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 1572
Justice Blackmun delivered the opinion of the Court. r-H In August 1983, petitioner Wayne T. Schmuck, a used-car distributor, was indicted in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin on 12 counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U. S. C. §§ 1341 and 1342. App. 3. The alleged fraud was a common and straightforward one. Schmuck purchased used
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972-05-03 · Published · cited 8× · 342 F. Supp. 203
342 F.Supp. 203 (1972) Wilbur A. HEINEMANN, Jr., Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 70 C 3023. United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D. February 28, 1972. On Motion for Amendment of Judgment May 3, 1972. George Bullwinkel, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff. E. Manning Giles, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.
District Court, S.D. New York · 2000-06-27 · Published · cited 49× · 104 F. Supp. 2d 236; 55 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1454; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8807; 2000 WL 863134
104 F.Supp.2d 236 (2000) Candace Anne CARELL Plaintiff, v. THE SHUBERT ORGANIZATION, INC.; John Napier; the Really Useful Group, Ltd.; the Really Useful Theatre Company, Ltd.; Really Useful Films, Ltd.; the Cats Company; Polygram NV; Universal Music Group, Inc.; Cameron Mackintosh, Inc.; Flummery Corporation; Nina Lannan Associates, Inc.; Polygram Video; Polygram Records, Inc.; Gerald Schoenfeld; Andrew Lloyd Weber; David Geffen; and Cameron Mack
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009-06-05 · Published · cited 39× · 627 F. Supp. 2d 384; 2009 WL 1743699
627 F.Supp.2d 384 (2009) BRACCO DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERSHAM HEALTH, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-6025. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 5, 2009. *396 Arnold B. Calmann, Esq., Saiber LLC, Newark, NJ, Donald L. Rhoads, Esq., Nicholas L. Coch, Esq., Christopher A. Colvin, Esq., Albert
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005-10-27 · Published · cited 3× · 397 F. Supp. 2d 575; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25250; 2005 WL 2810791
397 F.Supp.2d 575 (2005) In re STONEPATH GROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION No. Civ.A. 04-4515. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 27, 2005. *576 Deborah R. Gross, Susan R. Gross, Law Offices Bernard M. Gross, PC, Philadelphia, PA, Stephanie M. Beige, U. Seth Ottensoser, Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, LLP, Timoth
District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009-03-25 · Published · cited 1× · 613 F. Supp. 2d 518; 2009 WL 806581
613 F.Supp.2d 518 (2009) BRACCO DIAGNOSTICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMERSHAM HEALTH, INC., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 03-6025. United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 25, 2009. *530 Arnold B. Calmann, Esq., Saiber LLC, Newark, NJ, Donald L. Rhoads, Christopher A. Colvin, Albert B. Chen, David Lindenbaum, Benu Me
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998-07-07 · Published · cited 97× · 23 F. Supp. 2d 460; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10063; 1998 WL 377730
23 F.Supp.2d 460 (1998) ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ROUSSEL CORP., Roussel-Uclaf Holdings Corp., Roussel-Uclaf, S.A., Hoechst Marion Roussel North America, Biochimica Opos, S.P.A., The Rugby Group, Inc., Rugby Laboratories, Inc., American Home Products Corporation, American Cyanamid Company, Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Zenith Laboratories, Inc., Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-2009(JAG).
District Court, W.D. New York · 1997-11-19 · Published · cited 36× · 988 F. Supp. 127; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22436; 1997 WL 835440
988 F.Supp. 127 (1997) Gregory F. DANIEL, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN BOARD OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, et al., Defendants. No. 90-CV-1086A. United States District Court, W.D. New York. November 19, 1997. *128 *129 *130 *1