Cases

Per Curiam. This cause having been submitted to the court at a former day of this term upon the transcript of the record of the Interlocutory Order aforesaid, and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said Interlocutory Order; it is, therefore, co

295 B.R. 347 (2003) In re Albert G. GARLAND, Debtor. Albert G. Garland, Appellant, v. Estate of Merrill Maloney and Sharon Maloney, Appellees. BAP No. NV-02-1384-KBuB, Bankruptcy No. 01-33620-gwz. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted January 22, 2003. Memorandum Filed March 17, 2003. Revised an

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) FRANK ADAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-cv-3384 (TSC)

ACCEPTED 05-15-01002-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/10/2015 12:29:40 PM

This suit was brought originally in the district court by appellees as owners of a strip of land in the City of Garland, Texas, 30 feet wide and 490 feet long. Alleging that the appellant, City of Garland, had entered upon the premises and begun construction of a public street thereon, the appellees sued, not only for possession and removal of cloud on their title, and for damages, but also for injunction restraining appellant from further entering upon the premises and continuing the

HARRISON, J. Weldon E. Wright, the appellee in this court, appealed to the Pulaski circuit court from a judgment of the probate court refusing to allow a demand exhibited by him against the estate of Albert W. Webb, deceased, where, upon trial anew, he recovered judgment; and the administrator, Josiah.M. Giles, appealed to this court. . The defense, opposed, by

ROSS, Circuit Judge. Giles Edward Chapman is an inmate in the Missouri State Penitentiary at Jefferson City, Missouri. Though the record- on appeal does not state the date, Chapman was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment sometime prior to 1982. On February 9, 1982, the Missouri Supreme Court reversed

Mr. Chief Justice English delivered the opinion of the Court. In the month of August or September, 1854, Wm. Houser, of Van Burén, obtained possession of a mulatto boy named Bill, in the Indian country; and about the 16th of September, of the same year, placed him in possession of Samuel Strayhorn, of Dardanelle, and executed to him, on that day, a power of attorney, authoriz

354 S.W.2d 410 (1962) The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Appellant, v. J. E. GILES et ux., Appellees. No. 15987. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas. February 16, 1962. Rehearing Denied March 9, 1962. *411 Touchstone, Bernays & Johnston and G. Duffield Smith, Jr., Dallas, for appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NEESE, District Judge. This is a removed, 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (a), diversity, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) (1), (c), action. The plaintiff was granted in the state court a temporary injunction, requiring the defendant to continue to perform its agreement with him, and now seeks to have this injunction made permanent as well as the recovery of damages for the claimed unauthorized terminati

WARD, Justice. One phase of this litigation has already been before this Court. In the case of Garland County Board of Election Commissioner v. Ennis, 227 Ark. 880, 302 S.W. 2d 76, we held that the matter of abolishing certain townships (and combining them with other townships) was properly before the circuit court on appeal from the county court. Upon remand the circuit court h

Fullerton, J. This is an application for a writ of mandamus, directed to the Honorable Walter M. French, as judge of the superior court of Kitsap county, commanding him to vacate an order for a change, of venue entered in a cause pending in the court named. The cause is before us on the application for the writ and the return of the judge thereto. From these we do not find any substantial disagreement as to t

Braley, J. The plaintiff when at work as an electrician fitting a receptacle for light to a freight elevator at the second floor of the building, was struck in the face and his eyes injured by mortar falling from the hocks * or trowels of plasterers at work in the penthouse at the top of the elevator well. While the jury could have found that the plaintiff saw the men in the penthouse, which covered

Mount, J. — The defendant was' convicted of the crime of grand larceny. He appeals from a judgment pronounced upon the verdict of a jury. It appears that this is the second trial of the case upon the same state of facts. The defendant was found guilty upon the first trial, but upon his motion, the court granted a new trial. The reason for granting this motion does not appear from the record, but appellant stat

Allen, J. It has not been contended in argument that the sheriff would be liable, if, in the proper discharge of his duty, he took a delivery bond with security sufficient at the time, and the surety should thereafter become insolvent. The law imposes no such re*558sponsibility upon him.' It was introduced for the con- . , . . venience or the owner, and n

931 A.2d 15 (2007) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, v. Andre ROBINSON, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued October 26, 2006. Filed August 2, 2007. *18 J. Garland Giles, Philadelphia, for appellant. Max Kaufman, Asst. Dist. Atty., Philadelphia, for Com., appellee. BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J., STEVENS, MUSMA

BY THE COURT: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en *379banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixe

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge, joined by CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge, and JAMES L. DENNIS, EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, JENNIFER WALKER ELROD, LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, CATHARINA HAYNES, JAMES E. GRAVES, STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, GREGG COSTA, and KURT D. ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges: 1 The Supreme Court over several years has developed protectio

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge h The Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission' (Commission) denied appellant Cheri Stoker’s claim for additional medical testing and treatment, finding that they were not reasonably necessary for the compensable medical injuries Stoker sustained on December 5, 2014. In making its decision, the Commission relied on Dr. Steven

Eldon E. Fallon, U.S. District Court Judge *623Before the Court are two motions to dismiss without prejudice filed by Plaintiffs *624Herman LeBlanc, R. Doc. 569, and Donnie Beasley, R. Doc. 572. The motions are opposed. R. Doc. 579. Plaintiffs have filed a reply. R. Doc. 590. Havin